面向不同更新频率的数据产品定价策略研究
Pricing Strategies for Data Products with Different Update Frequencies
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.156708, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 杨宏舟*, 马 睿, 荣加骏:江苏大学管理学院,江苏 镇江
关键词: 数据交易更新频率感知价值定价决策Data Transactions Update Frequency Perceived Value Pricing Decisions
摘要: 数据要素价值化是推动数据市场化配置改革的重要路径。考虑到数据产品的价值往往呈现时效性特征,如何设计合理定价策略以提升数据交易双方匹配效率成为关键问题。根据供需双方交易行为分析,考虑数据需求者的初始感知价值具有异质性,基于更新频率构建数据交易双方的期望效用函数,通过分析均衡状态下数据供应商的收益情况,探讨不同数据产品质量和数据更新频率组合策略下的最优动态定价。研究发现:当数据更新成本偏低时,向初始感知价值偏高的数据需求者设定较低的数据更新频率为数据供应商的最优决策。当数据更新成本偏高时,“质量偏高、更新频率偏低”下的数据产品交易价格高于“质量偏低、更新频率偏高”下的交易价格。此外,当市场竞争强度偏高时,数据供应商预先决策数据产品质量下的收益高于同时决策质量和更新频率下的收益。本文的研究结论可进一步丰富现有的数据产品定价研究,并为数据供应商设计合理的数据更新频率策略提供指导借鉴。
Abstract: Valuing data elements is a crucial path to promoting market-based allocation reform of data. Considering the time-sensitive nature of data product value, designing reasonable pricing strategies to improve matching efficiency between data transaction parties becomes a key issue. Based on the analysis of supply and demand behavior, and considering the heterogeneity of the initial perceived value of data demanders, this paper constructs the expected utility function of both parties in data transactions based on update frequency. By analyzing the revenue of data suppliers under equilibrium conditions, it explores the optimal dynamic pricing under different combinations of data product quality and data update frequency strategies. The study finds that when data update costs are low, setting a lower data update frequency for data demanders with higher initial perceived value is the optimal decision for data suppliers. When data update costs are high, the transaction price of data products with “high quality and low update frequency” is higher than that with “low quality and high update frequency.” Furthermore, when market competition is intense, the revenue of data suppliers who pre-determine data product quality is higher than the revenue of simultaneously deciding on both quality and update frequency. The findings of this paper can further enrich existing research on data product pricing and provide guidance for data suppliers to design reasonable data update frequency strategies.
文章引用:杨宏舟, 马睿, 荣加骏. 面向不同更新频率的数据产品定价策略研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(6): 899-907. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.156708

参考文献

[1] 黄丽华, 郭梦珂, 邵志清, 等. 关于构建全国统一的数据资产登记体系的思考[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(10): 1426-1434.
[2] 王今朝, 窦一凡, 黄丽华. 单一供方情境下竞争企业的数据购买策略[J]. 管理科学学报, 2025, 28(4): 47-62.
[3] 江东, 袁野, 张小伟, 等. 数据定价与交易研究综述[J]. 软件学报, 2023, 34(3): 1396-1424.
[4] 丁小欧, 王宏志, 张笑影, 等. 数据质量多种性质的关联关系研究[J]. 软件学报, 2016, 27(7): 1626-1644.
[5] 熊巧琴, 汤珂. 数据要素的界权、交易和定价研究进展[J]. 经济学动态, 2021(2): 143-158.
[6] Yi, Z., Cao, Z. and Cheung, K.L. (2022) Managing Digital Piracy under Consumer Valuation Uncertainty: The Roles of Product Demonstrations and Antipiracy Measures. Information & Management, 59, Article 103601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 胡继晔, 付炜炜. 数据要素价值化助力培育新质生产力[J]. 财经问题研究, 2024(9): 48-60.
[8] 林娟娟, 黄志刚, 唐勇. 数据质量、数量与数据资产定价: 基于消费者异质性视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 88-98.
[9] Yu, H. and Zhang, M. (2017) Data Pricing Strategy Based on Data Quality. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 112, 1-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Moges, H., Vlasselaer, V.V., Lemahieu, W. and Baesens, B. (2016) Determining the Use of Data Quality Metadata (DQM) for Decision Making Purposes and Its Impact on Decision Outcomes—An Exploratory Study. Decision Support Systems, 83, 32-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Xing, A. and Wang, H. (2024) Pricing and Sample Set Strategies of Data Providers under Quality Information Asymmetry. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 75, 278-296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Li, Z., Yang, Z. and Xie, S. (2019) Computing Resource Trading for Edge-Cloud-Assisted Internet of Things. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15, 3661-3669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Xing, A., Wang, H., Bian, B. and Guo, X. (2024) Contract Theory-Based Collection, Updating, and Packaging Combination Strategies in Data Trading. Service Science, 16, 297-318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Wei, X.D. and Nault, B.R. (2013) Experience Information Goods: “Version-to-Upgrade”. Decision Support Systems, 56, 494-501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Zhou, Y.W., Guo, J. and Zhou, W. (2018) Pricing/Service Strategies for a Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Free Riding and Service-Cost Sharing. International Journal of Production Economics, 196, 198-210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Choi, T.M. (2007) Pre-Season Stocking and Pricing Decisions for Fashion Retailers with Multiple Information Updating. International Journal of Production Economics, 106, 146-170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Xu, B., Yao, Z. and Wu, S. (2021) Pricing Strategies for a Bundled Channel with Services Network Effects. International Journal of Production Research, 59, 3152-3168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 王今朝, 窦一凡, 黄丽华, 等. 数据产品交易的定价研究: 进展评述与方法比较[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2023(4): 22-27.
[19] Zhang, M., Arafa, A., Huang, J. and Poor, H.V. (2021) Pricing Fresh Data. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 39, 1211-1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Wang, R., Ke, C. and Cui, S. (2022) Product Price, Quality, and Service Decisions under Consumer Choice Models. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 24, 430-447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 喻海飞, 黄晋婷. 基于闭环数据供应链的数据产品定价策略研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2023, 37(1): 136-146.