政企协同视域下公路水运工程智慧检测多级联动机制研究
Research on the Multi-Level Linkage Mechanism of Intelligent Testing in Highway and Waterway Engineering from the Perspective of Government-Enterprise Collaboration
DOI: 10.12677/mm.2026.166128, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 虢 柱, 肖 滨, 肖玲芳:湖南省交通建设质量安全监督管理局,湖南 长沙;杜勇立, 何现启:湖南省交通建设工程试验检测协会,湖南 长沙;蒋建清*, 左 仕:长沙学院土木工程学院,湖南 长沙;长沙学院公路工程自然灾害风险普查大数据智慧应用湖南省重点实验室,湖南 长沙
关键词: 政企协同智慧检测多级联动委托代理理论公路水运工程Government-Enterprise Collaboration Intelligent Testing Multi-Level Linkage Principal-Agent Theory Highway and Waterway Engineering
摘要: 破解公路水运工程质量检测中的“委托–代理”困境,消除政企信息不对称与科层制监管滞后,是提升数字时代交通基础设施治理效能的关键。本文引入委托代理与协同治理理论,以某省级智慧检测云平台为案例,构建了涵盖源头数据穿透、敏捷纠偏响应与数字信用激励的多级联动理论框架,并利用平台运行大数据进行了实证检验。研究发现:依托物联网的数据直采直报机制有效剥夺了篡改数据的物理条件,从源头破除了信息孤岛;跨越科层的预警智能路由机制将隐患响应周期大幅压缩,实现了质量监管的在线协同闭环;同时,动态信用画像重塑了代理人的收益预期,遏制了机会主义行为并化解了逆向选择风险。智慧检测多级联动机制通过重塑政企间的信息流向与博弈结构,实现了工程质量从单向被动管控向多方协同共治的范式跃升,为大型基础设施监管的数字化转型提供了理论与实践样板。
Abstract: Breaking the “principal-agent” dilemma in the quality testing of highway and waterway engineering, and eliminating information asymmetry and bureaucratic regulatory lag, are crucial for enhancing the governance efficacy of transportation infrastructure in the digital age. Drawing on the Principal-Agent Theory and Collaborative Governance Theory, this paper takes a provincial intelligent testing cloud platform as an empirical case to construct a multi-level linkage theoretical framework encompassing source data penetration, agile rectification response, and digital credit incentives. The framework is then empirically tested using the platform’s operational big data. The findings reveal that the Internet of Things (IoT)-based direct data reporting mechanism deprives agents of the physical conditions for data tampering, thereby dismantling information silos at the source. Moreover, the early-warning intelligent routing mechanism, which transcends bureaucratic boundaries, significantly compresses the hazard response cycle, achieving an online collaborative closed-loop in quality supervision. Simultaneously, dynamic credit profiling effectively reshapes the agents’ payoff expectations, curbing opportunistic behaviors and mitigating the risk of adverse selection. By reshaping the information flow and game structure between the government and enterprises, the multi-level linkage mechanism of intelligent testing facilitates a paradigm shift from top-down unilateral control to multi-party collaborative governance, providing a vital theoretical and practical paradigm for the digital transformation of large-scale infrastructure supervision.
文章引用:虢柱, 肖滨, 肖玲芳, 杜勇立, 何现启, 蒋建清, 左仕. 政企协同视域下公路水运工程智慧检测多级联动机制研究[J]. 现代管理, 2026, 16(6): 127-141. https://doi.org/10.12677/mm.2026.166128

参考文献

[1] Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989) Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 郭汉丁, 郝海, 张印贤. 工程质量政府监督代理链分析与多层次激励机制探究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(6): 82-90.
[3] 郭汉丁, 张印贤, 陶凯. 工程质量政府监督多层次利益分配与激励协同机制探究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(2): 170-178.
[4] Janowski, T. (2015) Digital Government Evolution: From Transformation to Contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 221-236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 郭汉丁, 王星, 郝海, 等. 工程质量政府监督行为的进化博弈协同机理与激励策略[J]. 华侨大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 38(2): 164-168.
[6] 陈志超, 陈国伟. 基于“互联网+”的交通工程智慧监管系统建设[J]. 工程技术研究, 2019, 4(19): 146-147.
[7] 徐宁. 建设工程质量监督管理数字化应用探讨[J]. 住宅与房地产, 2025(29): 95-97.
[8] Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2008) Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543-571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T. and Balogh, S. (2012) An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 黄璜, 谢思娴, 姚清晨, 等. 数字化赋能治理协同: 数字政府建设的“下一步行动” [J]. 电子政务, 2022(4): 1-27.
[11] 王尉, 王丹. 数字政府建设背景下多元治理主体的协同模式创新与共治效果提升[J]. 领导科学, 2023(1): 110-113.
[12] 陈水生. 城市治理数字化转型的整体性逻辑[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 50(6): 72-80.
[13] 胡象明, 唐波勇. 整体性治理: 公共管理的新范式[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2010, 49(1): 11-15.
[14] 王君. 整体性治理视角下智慧城市实践优化研究[J]. 新型城镇化, 2023(6): 120-123.
[15] 邓建宇, 戴宁, 陈珺, 等. 智慧化建设工程质量检测管理及监督的探索与实践[J]. 工程质量, 2025, 43(6): 16-19+23.