冲突法视角下人工智能侵权法律适用问题研究
Research on the Application of Law to Artificial Intelligence Infringement from the Perspective of Conflict of Laws
摘要: 人工智能技术的跨境应用打破了传统侵权法律关系的物理边界,使涉外侵权冲突规范面临严峻挑战。文章从冲突法视角出发,以我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》的现行规则为基础,结合近年域内外典型司法案例,系统剖析涉外人工智能侵权在法律适用中面临的识别困境、侵权行为地认定困境、法律选择方法适用障碍以及例外规则适用困境。在此基础上,从立法完善、现行法解释论调适及多元共治三个维度提出规则因应方案。研究认为,在专门立法出台前的过渡期内,应通过目的性扩张解释将人工智能侵权纳入既有冲突规范框架,增设最密切联系例外条款以增强法律选择的灵活性,并推动跨境证据协作与判决互认机制建设,从而在技术创新激励与受害人权益保护之间实现动态平衡。
Abstract: The cross-border application of artificial intelligence technology has broken through the physical boundaries of traditional tort legal relationships, posing severe challenges to conflict rules for foreign-related torts. From the perspective of conflict of laws and based on the current rules of China’s Law on the Application of Law to Foreign-Related Civil Relations, this article systematically analyzes the dilemmas in the application of law to foreign-related AI infringement, including the ambiguity of characterization, the difficulty in determining the place of tort, the obstacles in applying law selection methods, and the application dilemmas of exception rules, with reference to typical judicial cases both at home and abroad in recent years. On this basis, the article proposes institutional solutions from three dimensions: legislative improvement, interpretive adjustment under the current legal framework, and multi-stakeholder co-governance. The study concludes that during the transitional period before specialized legislation is enacted, purposively expansive interpretation should be adopted to incorporate AI infringement into the existing conflict rule framework, an exception clause based on the closest connection principle should be added to enhance the flexibility of law selection, and mechanisms for cross-border evidence collaboration and mutual recognition of judgments should be promoted, so as to achieve a dynamic balance between technological innovation incentives and the protection of victims’ rights and interests.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
黄慧敏. 涉外人工智能侵权的法律适用偏差及其调试[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2025(5): 266-276.
|
|
[2]
|
张凌寒. 人工智能法律治理的路径扩展[J]. 中国社会科学, 2025(1): 91-110.
|
|
[3]
|
孙南翔, 仝安冉. 人工智能立法的域外应用:功能价值与实现路径[J]. 常州大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 26(6): 1-12.
|
|
[4]
|
王轶晗, 王竹. 医疗人工智能侵权责任法律问题研究[J]. 云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 52(3): 102-110.
|
|
[5]
|
程啸, 林琳. 人工智能侵权之产品责任适用的边界与路径[N]. 人民法院报, 2025-11-03(002).
|
|
[6]
|
颜星悦. 那是我的脸, 但说的全是谎言[EB/OL]. https://news.ifeng.com/c/8qV8hBHCvJI, 2026-02-05.
|
|
[7]
|
李双元, 欧福永. 国际私法[M]. 第5版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2018: 104.
|
|
[8]
|
韩培德. 国际私法[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000: 205.
|
|
[9]
|
起海霞. 个人信息涉外侵权案件中“侵权行为地”管辖基础的思考[J]. 中国国际私法与比较法年刊, 2023, 33(2): 220-221.
|
|
[10]
|
刘春艳. 生成式人工智能侵权责任研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学, 2025.
|
|
[11]
|
尚雪睿. 涉人工智能侵权的冲突法问题研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 上海财经大学, 2024.
|
|
[12]
|
国家发展和改革委员会. 对十四届全国人大三次会议第4556号建议的答复[EB/OL]. 2025-08-12. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/jianyitianfuwen/qgrddbjyfwgk/202511/t20251120_1401789_ext.html, 2026-05-11.
|
|
[13]
|
http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c2/c30834/202603/t20260316_453275.html
|
|
[14]
|
操昊东. 论我国侵权冲突发例外条款的构建[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 中南财经政法大学, 2024.
|
|
[15]
|
房保国. 论人工智能统一立法应缓行——渐进式治理范式的构建[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2026, 41(2): 1-20.
|
|
[16]
|
陈恒星. 北京互联网法院通报涉人工智能案件审理情况[EB/OL]. 2025-09-11. https://bjgy.bjcourt.gov.cn/article/detail/2025/09/id/8982773.shtml, 2026-05-11.
|