经皮脊柱内镜治疗神经根型颈椎病的 研究进展
Research Progress on Percutaneous Endoscopic Treatment for Radicular Cervical Spondylosis
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1662477, PDF,   
作者: 周怀忠*:吉首大学医学院,湖南 张家界;张家界市人民医院骨二科,湖南 张家界;刘超杰#:张家界市人民医院骨二科,湖南 张家界
关键词: 神经根型颈椎病经皮脊柱内镜颈椎间盘突出椎间孔成形术微创外科研究进展Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy Percutaneous Spinal Endoscopy Cervical Disc Herniation Foraminoplasty Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Progress
摘要: 神经根型颈椎病是颈椎退变性疾病中的常见类型,主要由椎间盘突出、钩椎关节增生、骨赘形成及椎间孔狭窄等因素导致颈神经根受压或炎性刺激,表现为颈肩痛、上肢放射痛、麻木及肌力减退。传统前路颈椎间盘切除融合术减压效果确切,但存在节段活动度丧失、邻近节段退变及吞咽困难等不足。近年来,经皮脊柱内镜技术逐渐应用于该病治疗,其通过小切口建立操作通道,在内镜直视下完成突出椎间盘摘除、椎间孔扩大及神经根松解,具有组织损伤小、出血少、术后恢复快、住院时间短及保留颈椎运动节段等优势。目前,前路、后路及双通道内镜技术均已在临床开展,其中后路内镜椎间孔成形术更适用于单侧神经根受压、外侧型椎间盘突出及椎间孔狭窄患者。现有研究表明,经皮脊柱内镜可有效缓解疼痛、改善颈椎功能,并具有较好的中短期安全性。然而,其疗效仍受适应证把握、术者经验、减压范围及并发症防控等因素影响。今后仍需依托多中心、大样本及长期随访研究,进一步明确其远期疗效、安全性及规范化应用价值。
Abstract: Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy represents one of the most prevalent forms of degenerative cervical spine disorders. It commonly arises from mechanical compression or inflammatory irritation of the cervical nerve roots secondary to disc herniation, uncovertebral joint hypertrophy, osteophyte formation, or narrowing of the intervertebral foramen. Patients typically present with neck and shoulder pain, radiating upper-limb pain, sensory disturbances, and varying degrees of motor weakness. Although anterior cervical discectomy and fusion remains an established surgical option with reliable decompressive efficacy, its inherent drawbacks, including loss of segmental motion, accelerated adjacent segment degeneration, and approach-related complications such as dysphagia, have prompted growing interest in motion-preserving and minimally invasive alternatives. Percutaneous spinal endoscopy has increasingly been adopted for the management of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. By establishing a working channel through a small incision, this technique enables targeted removal of herniated disc fragments, foraminal enlargement, and nerve root decompression under direct endoscopic visualization. Compared with conventional open procedures, it is associated with less soft-tissue disruption, reduced blood loss, faster postoperative recovery, shorter hospitalization, and preservation of cervical segmental mobility. Various endoscopic approaches, including anterior, posterior, and biportal techniques, have been applied in clinical practice. Among these, posterior endoscopic foraminoplasty appears particularly suitable for patients with unilateral radicular compression, lateral cervical disc herniation, or foraminal stenosis. Accumulating clinical evidence indicates that percutaneous spinal endoscopy can achieve meaningful pain relief and functional improvement in appropriately selected patients, with an acceptable short- to mid-term safety profile. Nevertheless, its outcomes are closely related to strict indication selection, surgeon experience, adequacy of decompression, and effective prevention of procedure-related complications. Further well-designed multicenter studies with larger cohorts and extended follow-up periods are needed to determine its long-term efficacy, safety, and role in standardized treatment strategies for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.
文章引用:周怀忠, 刘超杰. 经皮脊柱内镜治疗神经根型颈椎病的 研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(6): 2540-2554. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1662477

参考文献

[1] Kazeminasab, S., Nejadghaderi, S.A., Amiri, P., Pourfathi, H., Araj-Khodaei, M., Sullman, M.J.M., et al. (2022) Neck Pain: Global Epidemiology, Trends and Risk Factors. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23, Article No. 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] GBD 2021 Neck Pain Collaborators (2024) Global, Regional, and National Burden of Neck Pain, 1990-2020, and Projections to 2050: A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet Rheumatology, 6, e142-e155.
[3] Tsalimas, G., Evangelopoulos, D.S., Benetos, I.S. and Pneumaticos, S. (2022) Dysphagia as a Postoperative Complication of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Cureus, 14, e26888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Huang, X., Cai, Y., Chen, K., Ren, Q., Huang, B., Wan, G., et al. (2025) Risk Factors and Treatment Strategies for Adjacent Segment Disease Following Spinal Fusion (Review). Molecular Medicine Reports, 31, Article No. 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Huang, C., Fitts, J., Huie, D., Bhowmick, D.A. and Abd-El-Barr, M.M. (2024) Evolution of Cervical Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Current Progress and Future Directions—A Narrative Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13, Article 2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Huo, L.Y., Yang, X.X., Feng, T.X., Li, Y.D. and Wang, P. (2022) Management of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review. Global Spine Journal, 12, 1912-1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Margetis, K., Magnus, W. and Mesfin, F.B. (2025) Cervical Radiculopathy. StatPearls.
[8] Kim, M., Park, Y., Kang, C. and Choi, S.H. (2025) Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and Radiculopathy: A Stepwise Approach and Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes: A Narrative Review of Recent Literature. Asian Spine Journal, 19, 121-132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Sarwan, G. and De Jesus, O. (2023) Electrodiagnostic Evaluation of Cervical Radiculopathy. StatPearls.
[10] Wang, Y., Chen, X., Li, X., Wang, D., Rong, D., Sun, Z., et al. (2025) Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Different Compression Locations in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 20, Article No. 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Jiang, D., Lei, S., Hong, J., Lin, X., Chen, R., She, D., et al. (2025) Grading Cervical Neural Foraminal Stenosis via 3-T MR Nerve/Bone Fusion Imaging Compared with T2-Weighted Imaging. Insights into Imaging, 16, Article No. 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Meacock, J., Smedley, A., Sinha, P., Igra, M., Macmullen-Price, J., Jayne, D., Stocken, D., Currie, S. and Thomson, S. (2025) Radiological Cervical Foraminal Stenosis Severity and Morphology as a Predictor of Pre-Operative Function and Functional Surgical Outcome. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 39, 675-683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Gunjotikar, S., Pestonji, M., Tanaka, M., Komatsubara, T., Ekade, S.J., Heydar, A.M., et al. (2024) Evolution, Current Trends, and Latest Advances of Endoscopic Spine Surgery. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13, Article 3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Hagan, M.J., Remacle, T., Leary, O.P., Feler, J., Shaaya, E., Ali, R., et al. (2022) Navigation Techniques in Endoscopic Spine Surgery. BioMed Research International, 2022, Article ID: 8419739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Lee, Y., Cho, D. and Kim, K. (2024) Navigation-Guided/Robot-Assisted Spinal Surgery: A Review Article. Neurospine, 21, 8-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Sharma, A.K., de Oliveira, R.G., Suvithayasiri, S., Chavalparit, P., Chang, C.C., Kim, Y.H., et al. (2025) The Utilization of Navigation and Emerging Technologies with Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review. Neurospine, 22, 105-117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Ahn, Y. (2023) Anterior Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy: Surgical Technique and Literature Review. Neurospine, 20, 11-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Kim, J.Y., Hong, H.J., Lee, D.C., Kim, T.H., Hwang, J.S. and Park, C.K. (2022) Comparative Analysis of 3 Types of Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Foraminal Stenosis, Uniportal-, Biportal Endoscopy, and Microsurgery: Radiologic and Midterm Clinical Outcomes. Neurospine, 19, 212-223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Kang, M., You, K., Han, S., Park, S., Choi, J. and Park, H. (2022) Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic versus Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Unilateral Cervical Foraminal Disc Disease. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 14, 539-547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Lee, S.H., Seo, J., Jeong, D., Hwang, J.S., Jang, J., Cho, Y.E., et al. (2024) Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with a Comparison to Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy. Neurospine, 21, 807-819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Kang, M., Park, H., Park, S., You, K. and Ju, W. (2023) Learning Curve for Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Determined Using the Cumulative Summation Test. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18, Article No. 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Zhang, J., Zhou, Q., Yan, Y., Ren, J., Wei, S., Zhu, H., et al. (2022) Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy for Cervical Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17, Article No. 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Alomar, S.A., Maghrabi, Y., Baeesa, S.S. and Alves, Ó.L. (2022) Outcome of Anterior and Posterior Endoscopic Procedures for Cervical Radiculopathy Due to Degenerative Disk Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Global Spine Journal, 12, 1546-1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Guo, L., Wang, J., Zhao, Z., Li, J., Zhao, H., Gao, Y., et al. (2023) Microscopic Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Keyhole Foraminotomy for Single-Level Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical Spine Surgery, 36, 59-69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Rajjoub, R., Nguyen, R., Ghaith, A.K., El-Hajj, V.G., De Biase, G., Onyedimma, C., et al. (2024) Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy versus the Anterior Transcorporeal Approach for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 41, 508-518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Almasi, A., Jafari, S., Solouki, L. and Darvishi, N. (2023) The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Advanced Biomedical Research, 12, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Yao, R., Yan, M., Liang, Q., Wang, H., Liu, Z., Li, F., et al. (2022) Clinical Efficacy and Learning Curve of Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Laminoforaminotomy for Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy. Medicine, 101, e30401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Sun, X., Zhan, L., Tang, Z., Shen, M., Ma, H. and Tan, J. (2025) Clinical Efficacy and Learning Curve of Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy for Symptomatic Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 20, Article No. 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Sun, X., Wang, C., Kong, Q., Zhang, B., Feng, P., Liu, J., et al. (2024) Channel-assisted Cervical Key Hole Technology Combined with Ultrasonic Bone Osteotome versus Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy: A Clinical Retrospective Study. International Orthopaedics, 48, 547-553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Zhang, Y., Dai, J., Dai, G., Zhan, W., Wang, Y. and Hu, P. (2025) Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy versus Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Key-Hole Techniques for Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: A Retrospective Study with 2 Years. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 20, Article No. 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Zhang, P., Jin, Y., Zhu, B., Zheng, M., Ying, X. and Zheng, Q. (2023) Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Foraminotomy and Diskectomy Combined with Piezosurgery for Treating Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy with Neuropathic Radicular Pain. Frontiers in Neurology, 14, Article 1100641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Shi, C.G., et al. (2021) Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy Assisted with SNRB in Treating Cervical Radiculopathy with Diagnostic Uncertainty. Pain Physician, 24, E483-E492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Paik, S., Choi, Y., Chung, C.K., Won, Y.I., Park, S.B., Yang, S.H., et al. (2023) Cervical Kinematic Change after Posterior Full-Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy for Disc Herniation or Foraminal Stenosis. PLOS ONE, 18, e0281926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Wang, X., Li, T., Li, Y. and Long, Y. (2025) Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy for Single-Segment Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: A Retrospective Study with Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up. Journal of Pain Research, 18, 2879-2888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Monk, S.H., Hani, U., Pfortmiller, D., Dyer, E.H., Smith, M.D., Kim, P.K., et al. (2023) Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Microendoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy: A 1-Year Cost-Utility Analysis. Neurosurgery, 93, 628-635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] The Dinh, H., Ngoc Dinh, S., Hoang Nguyen, L., Manh Do, H., Van Nguyen, T. and Van Vu, C. (2025) Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Single-Level Full Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy and Herniectomy: A 12 Months Follow-Up. Orthopedic Research and Reviews, 17, 517-529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] Kwon, H. and Park, J. (2023) The Role and Future of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review. Neurospine, 20, 43-55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Hahn, B. and Park, J. (2021) Incorporating New Technologies to Overcome the Limitations of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Navigation, Robotics, and Visualization. World Neurosurgery, 145, 712-721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Schmidt, B.T., Chen, K., Kim, J. and Brooks, N.P. (2024) Applications of Navigation in Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery. European Spine Journal, 33, 429-437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Yuh, W.T., Lee, Y.S. and Choi, I.H. (2023) Future of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Insights from Cutting-Edge Technology in the Industrial Field. Bioengineering, 10, Article 1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Hellinger, S., Knight, M., Telfeian, A.E. and Lewandrowski, K. (2022) Patient Selection Criteria for Percutaneous Anterior Cervical Laser versus Endoscopic Discectomy. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 54, 530-539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Gunjotikar, S., et al. (2024) Evolution, Current Trends, and Latest Advances of Endoscopic Spine Surgery. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13, Article No. 3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[43] Lokhande, P.V. (2023) Full Endoscopic Spine Surgery. Journal of Orthopaedics, 40, 74-82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Chen, K., Kim, J., Huang, A.P., Lin, M.H. and Chen, C. (2023) Current Indications for Spinal Endoscopic Surgery and Potential for Future Expansion. Neurospine, 20, 33-42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Burkett, D. and Brooks, N. (2024) Advances and Challenges of Endoscopic Spine Surgery. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13, Article 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Ju, C.I. and Lee, S.M. (2023) Complications and Management of Endoscopic Spinal Surgery. Neurospine, 20, 56-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]