老年人情绪传播调节的社区干预研究——基于社区实践的考察
A Study of Community Intervention for Regulating Emotional Contagion in Older Adults—An Empirical Examination Based on Community Practice
DOI: 10.12677/ar.2026.136405, PDF,   
作者: 许曦文:南京林业大学人文社会科学学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 老龄化社会情绪选择理论社区服务情绪调节Aging Socio-Emotional Selectivity Theory Community Services Emotion Regulation
摘要: 随着人口老龄化加剧,老年人心理健康问题日益突出。社区作为老年人生活的主要场所,是开展情绪健康服务的重要载体。本研究基于社会情绪选择理论,采用案例分析法,梳理国内城市社区老年情绪调节干预实践,归纳出结构调整型、认知行为实践型、代际互动型和情感陪伴型四类干预模式。研究发现,现有干预虽契合老年人“追求情绪满足、维系亲密关系”的心理特征,但仍存在理论指导不足、专业能力欠缺、协同机制不健全等问题。据此提出差异化优化策略:结构调整型应完善激励保障,认知行为实践型需推进工具标准化,代际互动型要建立安全规范与评估体系,情感陪伴型须强化专业伦理建设。研究为提升社区老年情绪干预的针对性和有效性提供了理论参考与实践路径。
Abstract: As population aging intensifies, the mental health of older adults has become increasingly prominent. Communities, as the primary living environment for the elderly, serve as ideal settings for emotional health services. Grounded in socioemotional selectivity theory and using case analysis, this study identifies four types of community-based emotional regulation interventions in Chinese cities: structural adjustment, cognitive-behavioral practice, intergenerational interaction, and emotional companionship. Findings show that while existing interventions align with older adults’ preference for emotional satisfaction and close relationships, they face challenges such as insufficient theoretical guidance, lack of professional capacity, and weak multi-stakeholder coordination. Differentiated strategies are proposed: structural interventions require enhanced incentives; cognitive-behavioral interventions need standardized tools; intergenerational interventions call for safety protocols and evaluation systems; emotional companionship interventions demand stronger professional ethics. This study provides theoretical and practical guidance for improving targeted and effective emotional intervention services for the elderly in communities.
文章引用:许曦文. 老年人情绪传播调节的社区干预研究——基于社区实践的考察[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(6): 673-679. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.136405

参考文献

[1] 章玉萍, 吴心越. 老龄化传播视角下认知症研究的挑战与潜能[J]. 江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2026, 59(2): 49-59.
[2] Carstensen, L.L., Turan, B., Scheibe, S., Ram, N., Ersner-Hershfield, H., Samanez-Larkin, G.R., et al. (2011) Emotional Experience Improves with Age: Evidence Based on over 10 Years of Experience Sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26, 21-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 国家卫生健康委办公厅, 民政部办公厅, 国家医保局办公室, 等. 关于开展医养结合促进行动的通知[EB/OL]. 2025-10-29.
http://wjw.xinjiang.gov.cn/hfpc/zcwj2/202511/bbb3a08137c449dabf2c38bd835f45b3.shtml, 2026-04-23.
[4] 敖玲敏, 吕厚超, 黄希庭. 社会情绪选择理论概述[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(2): 217-223.
[5] Suri, G. and Gross, J.J. (2012) Emotion Regulation and Successful Aging. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 409-410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 龚先旻, 王大华. 老年人情绪记忆中的积极效应及其产生机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(9): 1411-1418.
[7] Livingstone, K.M. and Isaacowitz, D.M. (2021) Age and Emotion Regulation in Daily Life: Frequency, Strategies, Tactics, and Effectiveness. Emotion, 21, 39-51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 方静文. 互助作为社会干预——中国乡村老人精神健康促进的探索[J]. 开放时代, 2024(6): 193-207+10.
[9] 陈际华. “时间银行”互助养老模式发展难点及应对策略——基于积极老龄化的理论视角[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2020(1): 68-74.
[10] 张姝. 公共养老服务合作生产的行动逻辑与实现机制——基于南京市“时间银行”建设的案例分析[J]. 卫生软科学, 2025, 39(10): 37-44.
[11] 南京财经大学. “金三角”基层服务践行团深入调研“时间银行”服务兑现[EB/OL].
https://tw.nufe.edu.cn/info/1045/11395.htm, 2025-08-04.
[12] 王婧, 周冬梅, 杨梦婷. 社区老年慢性病患者认知情绪调节策略与情感气质的关系研究[J]. 心理月刊, 2026, 21(3): 22-24+28.
[13] 枣阳市人民政府. 南城街道盛隆社区: 实行“银龄带童”共学 解决“一老一小”需求[EB/OL].
http://hbxy.wenming.cn/wmcj/wmsq/202511/t20251124_9085818.shtml, 2025-11-21.
[14] 吴彬. 健康老龄化战略下以隔代照料构建代际共赢新格局[J]. 健康中国观察, 2026(2): 77-78.
[15] 河北工业职业技术大学. 河北工业职业技术大学2022年暑期社会实践圆满结束[EB/OL]. 2022-09-22.
https://www.hbcit.edu.cn/info/1004/8714.htm, 2026-06-23.
[16] 杨雅雯. 积极老龄化政策下智慧养老的社工适应性角色研究——以数字反哺与情感支持为例[J]. 国际公关, 2025(24): 17-19.
[17] 王莉, 李阳, 张雨薇. 生态系统观下我国智慧养老服务的困境识别与路径优化[J]. 中国卫生事业管理, 2024, 41(2): 121-125+202.
[18] 国家政务服务平台. 国家卫生健康委办公厅等五部门关于开展医养结合促进行动的通知[EB/OL].
https://zc.gjzwfw.gov.cn/art/2025/11/13/art_14_82338.html, 2025-10-30.