延迟退休背景下低龄老人就业的社会分化与协同治理路径
Social Differentiation and Collaborative Governance Paths of Younger Older Adults’ Employment under the Background of Delayed Retirement
摘要: 2024年渐进式延迟退休政策正式实施,标志着我国老年人力资源开发进入制度化推进阶段。本文基于第七次全国人口普查数据、中国老年社会追踪调查(CLASS)数据与现行政策文本,聚焦50~69岁低龄老人就业的群体分化特征与治理困境,分析职业背景、人力资本与经济保障对老年就业行为与就业质量的差异化影响。研究发现,企业职工、灵活就业、低学历、低收入群体呈现经济驱动型就业特征,而机关事业单位、高学历、高收入群体则表现为自主选择型就业倾向。当前低龄老人就业保障面临制度供给滞后、服务体系错位、市场激励不足三重现实梗阻。为此,本文提出构建政策、组织、市场三位一体的协同治理框架,通过完善法律制度筑牢权益保障、推进组织转型优化就业环境、培育银发业态扩大岗位供给,推动延迟退休政策与积极老龄化战略有效衔接,为实现低龄老年人力资源高质量开发与体面就业提供理论支撑与实践路径。
Abstract: The formal implementation of the progressive delayed retirement policy in 2024 marks that the development of China’s elderly human resources has entered a stage of institutionalization. Based on the data of the Seventh National Population Census, the China Longitudinal Aging Social Survey (CLASS) and current policy texts, this paper focuses on the group differentiation characteristics and governance dilemmas of employment among the young-old elderly aged 50~69, and analyzes the differentiated impacts of occupational background, human capital and economic security on the employment behavior and quality of the elderly. The study finds that employees of enterprises, flexible employment groups, low-educated and low-income groups are characterized by economy-driven employment, while retired personnel from government agencies and public institutions, high-educated and high-income groups tend to choose employment voluntarily. At present, the employment security of the young-old elderly is faced with three practical obstacles: lagging institutional supply, mismatched service system, and insufficient market incentives. Therefore, this paper proposes to construct a collaborative governance framework of policy, organization and market, improve rights and interests security through perfecting legal system, optimize employment environment by promoting organizational transformation, and expand job supply by fostering silver-haired industries, so as to promote the effective connection between the delayed retirement policy and the active aging strategy, and provide theoretical support and practical paths for the high-quality development and decent employment of the young-old elderly human resources.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
孙永健, 陈友华. 延迟退休背景下中国老年人的工作寿命及其分化[J]. 人口与经济, 2025(6): 103-120.
|
|
[2]
|
顾冬冬, 吴国宝. 延迟退休背景下低龄老人就业保障体系: 现实梗阻与建构路径[J]. 经济体制改革, 2025(6): 122-130.
|
|
[3]
|
刘为民, 苏强, 王永欣, 等. 延迟退休政策对我国养老金体系的影响分析[J]. 华北金融, 2025(9): 25-39.
|
|
[4]
|
牟文丽. 延迟退休背景下社保补贴政策的优化策略与实践探索[J]. 市场瞭望, 2025(20): 10-12.
|
|
[5]
|
王希茜. 延迟退休背景下年龄包容组织的双向赋能[J]. 企业管理, 2026(2): 115-118.
|
|
[6]
|
谢立黎, 韩文婷. 日本促进老年人就业的政策改革与启示[J]. 人口与经济, 2022(6): 77-92.
|
|
[7]
|
李佳, 薛凯文, 赵建国. “数字鸿沟”对城市低龄老年人再就业的影响研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2024(8): 189-199.
|
|
[8]
|
李磊, 杜孟飞, 曾之遥. 银发经济、养老产业、银龄消费概念及其关系辨析——基于“主体-内容-政策”的分析框架[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2025, 46(3): 57-66.
|
|
[9]
|
申广军, 谭韦珊. 老年就业对青年就业和职业的影响[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2026, 26(1): 24-40.
|