卵巢癌免疫相关基因预后模型的构建及验证
Construction and Validation of an Immune-Related Gene Prognostic Model for Ovarian Cancer
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1662483, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 隋昱麟*, 彭宇航*, 钟 乐:石河子大学临床医学院,新疆 石河子;高香亭#:石河子大学医学院病理学系,新疆 石河子;石河子大学第一附属医院病理科,新疆 石河子
关键词: 卵巢癌免疫基因预后模型TCGA数据库GTEx数据库Ovarian Cancer Immune Genes Prognostic Model TCGA Database GTEx Database
摘要: 目的:卵巢癌是女性生殖系统病死率最高的恶性肿瘤,早期症状隐匿、易复发耐药,单纯TNM分期难以满足精准预后评估需求。免疫相关基因与肿瘤微环境在卵巢癌进展、耐药及预后中发挥关键调控作用,可作为新型预后生物标志物。本研究基于TCGA、GTEx与ImmPort数据库,系统筛选卵巢癌免疫相关差异表达基因,构建并验证免疫基因预后模型,为临床预后分层与个体化治疗提供依据,同时初步筛选具有潜力的预后标志物。方法:从TCGA和GTEx数据集下载卵巢癌与正常卵巢组织转录组及临床数据,经数据质控后剔除临床信息不完整的样本、非原发性肿瘤及总生存期 ≤ 60天的病例,筛选差异表达免疫相关基因;对差异基因进行GO功能与KEGG通路富集分析;采用单因素Cox、LASSO与多因素Cox回归构建风险评分模型。在UCSC外部队列独立验证,以风险评分中位值为界划分高低风险组,通过生存曲线与ROC曲线分析评估模型效能。结果:共筛选出220个差异表达免疫相关基因,主要富集于中性粒细胞趋化、细胞因子–受体相互作用等通路。最终构建包含RELB、PI3等19个基因的预后模型,高风险组总生存期显著低于低风险组(P < 0.0001),模型1、3、5年AUC分别为0.602、0.710、0.731;风险评分可作为独立预后因子,RELB与PI3高表达提示预后不良,外部验证集生存曲线与ROC曲线显示高低风险组生存差异显著,证实模型较为稳定可靠。结论:本研究构建的卵巢癌免疫相关基因预后模型预测效能良好、稳定性相对较强,可在一定程度上实现患者风险分层,为卵巢癌预后评估、免疫靶点挖掘与精准治疗提供新的参考依据。
Abstract: Objective: Ovarian cancer stands as the malignancy with the highest mortality rate among female reproductive system cancers, characterized by insidious early symptoms, a propensity for recurrence and drug resistance. Simple Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging falls short of meeting the demands for precise prognostic evaluation. Immune-related genes and the tumor microenvironment play pivotal regulatory roles in the progression, drug resistance, and prognosis of ovarian cancer, serving as potential novel prognostic biomarkers. This study systematically screened immune-related differentially expressed genes in ovarian cancer based on data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx), and ImmPort databases. It aimed to construct and validate an immune gene prognostic model to provide a basis for clinical prognostic stratification and individualized treatment, while also preliminarily identifying promising prognostic markers. Methods: Transcriptomic and clinical data of ovarian cancer and normal ovarian tissues were downloaded from the TCGA and GTEx datasets. After data quality control, samples with incomplete clinical information, non-primary tumors, and cases with an overall survival period of ≤60 days were excluded. Differentially expressed immune-related genes were then identified. Gene Ontology (GO) functional and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were performed on the differentially expressed genes. A risk score model was constructed using univariate Cox, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The model was independently validated in an external cohort from the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC). High- and low-risk groups were delineated based on the median value of the risk score, and the model’s performance was evaluated through survival curve and ROC curve analyses. Results: A total of 220 differentially expressed immune-related genes were identified, primarily enriched in pathways such as neutrophil chemotaxis and cytokine-receptor interactions. A prognostic model comprising 19 genes, including RELB and PI3, was ultimately constructed. The overall survival of the high-risk group was significantly lower than that of the low-risk group (P < 0.0001). The area under the curve (AUC) values for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival predictions were 0.602, 0.710, and 0.731, respectively. The risk score emerged as an independent prognostic factor, with high expression of RELB and PI3 indicating a poor prognosis. Survival curves and ROC curves in the external validation set demonstrated significant survival differences between the high- and low-risk groups, confirming the model’s relatively stable and reliable performance. Conclusion: The immune-related gene prognostic model for ovarian cancer constructed in this study exhibits good predictive performance and relatively high stability. To a certain extent, it enables the stratification of patients based on risk levels, providing new reference insights for prognostic evaluation, immune target discovery, and precision treatment of ovarian cancer.
文章引用:隋昱麟, 彭宇航, 钟乐, 高香亭. 卵巢癌免疫相关基因预后模型的构建及验证[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(6): 2608-2620. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1662483

参考文献

[1] Webb, P.M. and Jordan, S.J. (2024) Global Epidemiology of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 21, 389-400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Ghose, A., McCann, L., Makker, S., Mukherjee, U., Gullapalli, S.V.N., Erekkath, J., et al. (2024) Diagnostic Biomarkers in Ovarian Cancer: Advances Beyond CA125 and HE4. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, 16, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 温灏, 邹冬玲, 吴小华. 中国卵巢上皮性癌维持治疗指南(2022年版) [J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2022, 38(1): 56-65.
[4] Xia, C., Dong, X., Li, H., Cao, M., Sun, D., He, S., et al. (2022) Cancer Statistics in China and United States, 2022: Profiles, Trends, and Determinants. Chinese Medical Journal, 135, 584-590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Marliot, F., Chen, X., Kirilovsky, A., Sbarrato, T., El Sissy, C., Batista, L., et al. (2020) Analytical Validation of the Immunoscore and Its Associated Prognostic Value in Patients with Colon Cancer. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, 8, e000272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Zhang, X., Yang, J., Du, L., Zhou, Y. and Li, K. (2020) The Prognostic Value of Immunoscore in Patients with Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 10,328 Patients. The International Journal of Biological Markers, 35, 3-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Li, J., Wang, J., Chen, R., Bai, Y. and Lu, X. (2017) The Prognostic Value of Tumor-Infiltrating T Lymphocytes in Ovarian Cancer. Oncotarget, 8, 15621-15631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Hwang, W., Adams, S.F., Tahirovic, E., Hagemann, I.S. and Coukos, G. (2012) Prognostic Significance of Tumor-Infiltrating T Cells in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Gynecologic Oncology, 124, 192-198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Juneja, V.R., McGuire, K.A., Manguso, R.T., LaFleur, M.W., Collins, N., Haining, W.N., et al. (2017) PD-L1 on Tumor Cells Is Sufficient for Immune Evasion in Immunogenic Tumors and Inhibits CD8 T Cell Cytotoxicity. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 214, 895-904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Ghisoni, E., Imbimbo, M., Zimmermann, S. and Valabrega, G. (2019) Ovarian Cancer Immunotherapy: Turning up the Heat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20, Article 2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Kanehisa, M. (2000) KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Research, 28, 27-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Harrell, F.E., Lee, K.L. and Mark, D.B. (1996) Multivariable Prognostic Models: Issues in Developing Models, Evaluating Assumptions and Adequacy, and Measuring and Reducing Errors. Statistics in Medicine, 15, 361-387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Lánczky, A. and Győrffy, B. (2021) Web-Based Survival Analysis Tool Tailored for Medical Research (KMplot): Development and Implementation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23, e27633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Almazrouei, K.M., Mishra, V., Pandya, H., Sambhav, K. and Bhavsar, S.N. (2025) Tumor Microenvironment and Its Role in Cancer Progression: An Integrative Review. Cureus, 17, e92707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Zhou, S., Liu, Y., Yin, W., Liao, Q., Quan, Q. and Mu, X. (2019) Clinicopathologic Factors Associated with Short-Term Survival in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Translational Cancer Research, 8, 2396-2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Cao, T. and Shen, H. (2021) Development of a Multi-Gene-Based Immune Prognostic Signature in Ovarian Cancer. Journal of Ovarian Research, 14, Article No. 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Zhang, T., Ma, C., Zhang, Z., Zhang, H. and Hu, H. (2021) NF‐κB Signaling in Inflammation and Cancer. MedComm, 2, 618-653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Li, Y., Li, H., Yang, B., Wei, J., Zhen, C. and Feng, L. (2020) Clinical Significance of PI3 and HLA-DOB as Potential Prognostic Predicators for Ovarian Cancer. Translational Cancer Research, 9, 466-476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Zheng, M., Mullikin, H., Hester, A., Czogalla, B., Heidegger, H., Vilsmaier, T., et al. (2020) Development and Validation of a Novel 11-Gene Prognostic Model for Serous Ovarian Carcinomas Based on Lipid Metabolism Expression Profile. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, Article 9169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Ghoneum, A. and Said, N. (2019) PI3K-Akt-mTOR and NFκB Pathways in Ovarian Cancer: Implications for Targeted Therapeutics. Cancers, 11, Article 949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Sohn, E.J. (2022) PIK3R3, a Regulatory Subunit of PI3K, Modulates Ovarian Cancer Stem Cells and Ovarian Cancer Development and Progression by Integrative Analysis. BMC Cancer, 22, Article No. 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] De Henau, O., Rausch, M., Winkler, D., Campesato, L.F., Liu, C., Cymerman, D.H., et al. (2016) Overcoming Resistance to Checkpoint Blockade Therapy by Targeting PI3Kγ in Myeloid Cells. Nature, 539, 443-447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Jiang, C., Liu, R. and Li, Z. (2025) A Phosphatidylinositol 3‐Kinase Gamma Inhibitor Enhances Anti‐Programmed Death‐1/Programmed Death Ligand‐1 Antitumor Effects by Remodeling the Tumor Immune Microenvironment of Ovarian Cancer. MedComm, 6, e70223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Wang, Y., Cheng, X., Li, W. and Zhang, H. (2024) Study on Correlation between CXCL13 and Prognosis and Immune Characteristics of Ovarian Cancer. Medicine, 103, e40272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Ukita, M., Hamanishi, J., Yoshitomi, H., Yamanoi, K., Takamatsu, S., Ueda, A., et al. (2022) CXCL13-Producing CD4+ T Cells Accumulate in the Early Phase of Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in Ovarian Cancer. JCI Insight, 7, e157215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]