再论能源消费效率技术悖论——基于中国的省际数据分析
Re-Discussion on the Paradox of EnergyConsumption Efficiency Technology—Based on the Analysis of Provincial Data in China
DOI: 10.12677/JLCE.2014.33003, PDF,   
作者: 郎春雷：浙江工商大学经济学院，杭州
关键词: 技术创新；能源消费；反弹效应；Technological Innovation； Energy Consumption； Rebound Effect
摘要: 技术创新一直以来被认为是提高能源使用效率，降低能源消费的重要因素，但是国外就技术创新对能源消费影响的悖论一直以来颇受关注，本文根据中国的省际数据分析，用技术创新的产出和投入不同指标，分析中国能源消费效率技术悖论，即技术创新对能源消费影响的“反弹效应”。
Abstract: Technological innovation is known as an important factor to improve the energy use efficiency and reduce the energy consumption on one hand. On the other hand, technological innovation is also well known as a paradox to energy consumption. Based on the provincial data in China, this paper will analyse the paradox of technology to energy consumption using different technological innovation input and output index, which is also called the rebound effect of technological innova-tion to energy consumption.
文章引用：郎春雷. 再论能源消费效率技术悖论——基于中国的省际数据分析[J]. 低碳经济, 2014, 3(3): 15-29. https://dx.doi.org/10.12677/JLCE.2014.33003

参考文献

[1] David, P. (2001) The effect of new technology on energy consumption. Resource and Energy Economics, 23, 215-239.
[2] David, P., Newell, R.G. and Jaffe, A.B. (2009) Energy, the environment, and technological change. Na-tional Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper 14832. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14832
[3] Weizsacker, E., Lovins, A. and Lovins, H. (1997) Factor four: Doubling wealth—Halving resource use. Earthscan, London.
[4] (2004) Energy efficiency: The government’s plan for action. Department of Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, London: DEFRA April.
[5] European Commission (2007) A European strategic energy technology plan (SET Plan)—Towards a low carbon future. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament. The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, COM2007, 723.
[6] De Beer, J. (1998) Potential for industrial energy-efficiency. University of Utrecht, Utrecht.
[7] Interlaboratory Working Group (1997) Scenarios of US carbon reductions. Potential impacts of energy technologies by 2010 and beyond. Interlaboratory Working Group, Washington, DC.
[8] Sinton J.E. and Levine M.D. (1994) Changing energy intensity in Chinese industry: The relatively importance of structural shift and intensity change. Energy Policy, 22, 239-255.
[9] Jaffe, A.B., Newell, R.G. and Stavins, R.N. (1999) Energy-efficient technologies and climate change policies: Issues and evidence. Climate Issue Brief 19, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
[10] Sinton, J.E. and Levine, M.D. (1994) Changing energy intensity in Chinese industry: The relatively importance of structural shift and intensity change. Energy Policy, 22, 239-255.
[11] Ma, C.B. and Stern, D.I. (2008) China’s changing energy intensity trend: A decomposition analysis. Energy Economics, 30, 1037-1053.
[12] Garbaccio, R.F., Ho, M.S. and Jorgenson, D.W. (1999) Why has the energy-output ratio fallen in China? Energy Journal, 20, 63-91.
[13] 蔡文彬, 胡宗义 (2007) 技术进步降低能源强度的CGE 研究. 统计与决策, 21, 8-10.
[14] 杨洋, 王非, 李国平 (2008) 能源价格、产业结构、技术进步与我国能源强度的实证检验. 统计与决策, 11, 103-105.
[15] 齐志新, 陈文颖 (2006) 结构调整还是技术进步?——改革开放后我国能源效率提高的因素分析. 上海经济研究, 6, 8-16.
[16] 龙如银, 李仲贵 (2009) 技术进步与能源强度关系的实证研究. 华东经济管理, 4, 36-39.
[17] 郝海, 顾培亮, 尹春华 (2002) 技术进步与能源消费的相互作用. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), S2, 34-36.
[18] 冯泰文, 孙林岩, 何哲 (2008) 技术进步对中国能源强度调节效应的实证研究. 科学学研究, 5, 987-993.
[19] Alcott, B. (2005) Jevons’ paradox. Ecological Economics, 54, 9-21.
[20] Jorgenson, D.W. and Fraumeni, B.M. (1981) Relative prices on technical change. In: Field, B.C. and Berndt, E.R., Eds., Modeling and Measuring Natural Resource Substitution, MIT Press, Cambridge, 17-47.
[21] Khazzoom, J.D. (1987) Energy savings from the adoption of more efficient appliance. Energy Journal, 3, 117-124.
[22] Brookes, L.G. (1992) Energy efficiency and economic fallacies: A reply. Energy Policy, 20, 390-392.
[23] Saunders, H.D. (1992) The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. Energy Journal, 13, 131-148.
[24] Herring, H. (2005) Energy efficiency: A critical view? Energy: The International Journal, 31, 10-20.
[25] Herring, H. and Roy, R. (2007) Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect. Technovation, 27, 194-203.
[26] Brannlund, R., Ghalwash, T. and Nordström, J. (2007) Increased energy efficiency and the rebound effect: Effects on consumption and emissions. Energy Economics, 29, 1-17.
[27] DEFRA (2006) The macro-economic rebound effect of energy efficiency improvements and the UK economy. Department of Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, London. http://www2.defra.gov.uk/research/project_data/More.asp?I=EE01015&M=KWS&V=Energy+Efficiency&SCOPE=0%20S
[28] Schipper, L. and Grubb, M. (2000) On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy uses in IEA countries. Energy Policy, 28, 367-388.
[29] Berndt, E.R., Kolstad, C.D. and Lee, J. (1993) Measuring the energy efficiency and productivity impacts of embodied technical change. The Energy Journal, 14, 33-55.
[30] Mountain, D.C., Stipdonk, B.P. and Warren, C.J. (1989) Technological innovation and a changing energy mix—A parametric and flexible approach to modeling Ontario manufacturing. The Energy Journal, 10, 139-158.
[31] Sterner, T. (1990) Energy efficiency and capital embodied technical change: The case of Mexican cement manufacturing. The Energy Journal, 11, 155-167.
[32] Roy, J. (2000) The rebound effect: Some empirical evidence from India. Energy Policy, 28, 433-438.

为你推荐