机器学习在给排水管网中的应用
The Application of Machine Learning in Water Supply and Drainage Networks
DOI: 10.12677/sea.2026.153045, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 朱远建:广西贵港北控水务有限公司,广西 贵港;广西南宁北控水务有限公司,广西 南宁;黄 扬:桂林理工大学环境科学与工程学院,广西 桂林;梁一为:广西南宁北控水务有限公司,广西 南宁;广西慧水科技有限公司,广西 南宁;岑敬明*, 李文丽, 朱建全:广西贵港北控水务有限公司,广西 贵港;陈祈安:桂林理工大学土木工程学院,广西 桂林;侯 辉*:桂林理工大学图书馆,广西 桂林
关键词: 机器学习图神经网络供水排水管网漏损检测物理信息神经网络Machine Learning Graph Neural Networks Water Supply and Drainage Pipeline Networks Leakage Detection Physical Information Neural Networks
摘要: 随着城市化进程的持续加速,给排水管网作为城市生命线工程的核心组成部分,其安全、高效、稳定运行直接关系到居民日常生活质量、城市生态环境可持续性以及城市整体韧性。传统水力建模方法在处理大规模、强非线性的管网运行问题时,普遍存在参数标定耗时久、计算成本高昂、对突发故障响应滞后等突出不足,难以满足现代城市智慧管网的运维需求。近年来,以深度学习、图神经网络为代表的机器学习技术快速发展,凭借其强大的数据挖掘、特征学习和复杂模式拟合能力,为给排水管网的漏损检测、爆管识别、水质预警、需水量预测以及城市内涝预报等关键运维任务提供了全新的解决思路与技术路径。本文系统梳理近五年机器学习在给排水管网领域的研究进展,从方法层面全面回顾传统机器学习、深度学习、图神经网络与物理信息神经网络的发展脉络及核心优势,从应用层面重点探讨其在供水管网漏损识别与定位、污染事件检测、需水量预测,以及排水管网管道缺陷识别、内涝预测等核心场景中的最新研究成果与实践应用。最后,深入分析现有研究方法面临的数据稀缺、模型可解释性不足与跨场景泛化能力薄弱等现实挑战,并对物理信息图神经网络与数字孪生融合等未来发展前景进行展望,为推动机器学习技术在城市给排水管网领域的深度应用与产业化落地提供参考。
Abstract: With the accelerating urbanization process, water supply and drainage networks—as critical components of urban infrastructure—play a pivotal role in ensuring safe, efficient, and stable operations that directly impact residents' quality of life, urban ecological sustainability, and overall urban resilience. Traditional hydraulic modeling methods exhibit significant limitations when addressing large-scale, highly nonlinear network operations, including time-consuming parameter calibration, high computational costs, and delayed responses to sudden failures, making them inadequate for modern smart urban pipeline management requirements. In recent years, rapid advancements in machine learning technologies—particularly deep learning and graph neural networks—have leveraged their robust data mining, feature learning, and complex pattern recognition capabilities to provide innovative solutions for critical operations tasks such as leakage detection, pipe rupture identification, water quality monitoring, water demand forecasting, and urban flooding prediction. This paper systematically reviews five years of research progress in machine learning applications for water supply and drainage networks, comprehensively examining the developmental trajectories and core strengths of traditional machine learning, deep learning, graph neural networks, and physical information neural networks at the methodological level, while focusing on cutting-edge research achievements and practical implementations in key scenarios—including leakage identification and localization in water supply networks, pollution event detection, water demand forecasting, pipeline defect detection, and flood prediction. Finally, this study conducts an in-depth analysis of the practical challenges faced by existing research methodologies—such as data scarcity, insufficient model interpretability, and weak cross-scenario generalization capabilities—and outlines future prospects for integrating physical information graph neural networks with digital twins. These insights provide valuable references for advancing the deep application and industrial implementation of machine learning technologies in urban water supply and drainage network systems.
文章引用:朱远建, 黄扬, 梁一为, 岑敬明, 李文丽, 陈祈安, 朱建全, 侯辉. 机器学习在给排水管网中的应用[J]. 软件工程与应用, 2026, 15(3): 479-493. https://doi.org/10.12677/sea.2026.153045

参考文献

[1] Wu, Z.Y., Sage, P. and Turtle, D. (2010) Pressure-Dependent Leak Detection Model and Its Application to a District Water System. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 136, 116-128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Lambert, A. (1994) Accounting for Losses: The Bursts and Background Concept. Water and Environment Journal, 8, 205-214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Kingdom, B., Liemberger, R. and Marin, P. (2006) The Challenge of Reducing Non-Revenue Water (NRW) in Developing Countries—How the Private Sector Can Help: A Look at Performance-Based Service Contracting.
https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/wbkwboper/17238.htm
[4] Liemberger, R. and Wyatt, A. (2018) Quantifying the Global Non-Revenue Water Problem. Water Supply, 19, 831-837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2023) Climate Change 2021—The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Hammond, M.J., Chen, A.S., Djordjević, S., Butler, D. and Mark, O. (2015) Urban Flood Impact Assessment: A State-of-the-Art Review. Urban Water Journal, 12, 14-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Rossman, L.A. (2013) Storm Water Management Model User’s Manual Version 5.1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
[8] Rossman, L.A. (2000) EPANET 2 Users Manual. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
[9] Kapelan, Z.S., Savic, D.A. and Walters, G.A. (2007) Calibration of Water Distribution Hydraulic Models Using a Bayesian-Type Procedure. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133, 927-936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Savic, D.A., Kapelan, Z.S. and Jonkergouw, P.M.R. (2009) Quo Vadis Water Distribution Model Calibration? Urban Water Journal, 6, 3-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Boyle, T., Giurco, D., Mukheibir, P., Liu, A., Moy, C., White, S., et al. (2013) Intelligent Metering for Urban Water: A Review. Water, 5, 1052-1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Stewart, R.A., Nguyen, K., Beal, C., Zhang, H., Sahin, O., Bertone, E., et al. (2018) Integrated Intelligent Water-Energy Metering Systems and Informatics: Visioning a Digital Multi-Utility Service Provider. Environmental Modelling & Software, 105, 94-117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. and Hinton, G. (2015) Deep Learning. Nature, 521, 436-444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Wu, Y. and Liu, S. (2017) A Review of Data-Driven Approaches for Burst Detection in Water Distribution Systems. Urban Water Journal, 14, 972-983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Hu, Z., Chen, B., Chen, W., Tan, D. and Shen, D. (2021) Review of Model-Based and Data-Driven Approaches for Leak Detection and Location in Water Distribution Systems. Water Supply, 21, 3282-3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Adedeji, K.B., Hamam, Y., Abe, B.T. and Abu-Mahfouz, A.M. (2017) Towards Achieving a Reliable Leakage Detection and Localization Algorithm for Application in Water Piping Networks: An Overview. IEEE Access, 5, 20272-20285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Wu, Z., Pan, S., Chen, F., Long, G., Zhang, C. and Yu, P.S. (2021) A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 32, 4-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Zhou, J., Cui, G., Hu, S., Zhang, Z., Yang, C., Liu, Z., et al. (2020) Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applications. AI Open, 1, 57-81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P. and Karniadakis, G.E. (2019) Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Solving Forward and Inverse Problems Involving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686-707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Karniadakis, G.E., Kevrekidis, I.G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S. and Yang, L. (2021) Physics-Informed Machine Learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3, 422-440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Mounce, S.R., Mounce, R.B. and Boxall, J.B. (2011) Novelty Detection for Time Series Data Analysis in Water Distribution Systems Using Support Vector Machines. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 13, 672-686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Winkler, D., Haltmeier, M., Kleidorfer, M., Rauch, W. and Tscheikner-Gratl, F. (2018) Pipe Failure Modelling for Water Distribution Networks Using Boosted Decision Trees. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 14, 1402-1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Chen, T. and Guestrin, C. (2016) XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Association for Computing Machinery, 785-794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Breiman, L. (2001) Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Lučin, I., Lučin, B., Čarija, Z. and Sikirica, A. (2021) Data-Driven Leak Localization in Urban Water Distribution Networks Using Big Data for Random Forest Classifier. Mathematics, 9, Article No. 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Snider, B. and McBean, E.A. (2020) Improving Urban Water Security through Pipe-Break Prediction Models: Machine Learning or Survival Analysis. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 146, Article ID: 04019129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Heaton, J. (2018) Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville: Deep Learning. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 19, 305-307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Kumar, S.S., Abraham, D.M., Jahanshahi, M.R., Iseley, T. and Starr, J. (2018) Automated Defect Classification in Sewer Closed Circuit Television Inspections Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Automation in Construction, 91, 273-283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. and Hinton, G.E. (2012) ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’12), Lake Tahoe, 3-6 December 2012, 1097-1105.
[30] Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., et al. (2014) Learning Phrase Representations Using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, October 2014, 1724-1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J. (1997) Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation, 9, 1735-1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Antunes, A., Andrade-Campos, A., Sardinha-Lourenço, A. and Oliveira, M.S. (2018) Short-Term Water Demand Forecasting Using Machine Learning Techniques. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 20, 1343-1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Guo, G., Liu, S., Wu, Y., Li, J., Zhou, R. and Zhu, X. (2018) Short-Term Water Demand Forecast Based on Deep Learning Method. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 144, Article ID: 04018076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Vaswani, A., et al. (2017) Attention Is All You Need. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, 4-9 December 2017, 6000-6010.
[35] Cody, R.A., Tolson, B.A. and Orchard, J. (2020) Detecting Leaks in Water Distribution Pipes Using a Deep Autoencoder and Hydroacoustic Spectrograms. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 34, Article ID: 04020001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] Bronstein, M.M., Bruna, J., LeCun, Y., Szlam, A. and Vandergheynst, P. (2017) Geometric Deep Learning: Going Beyond Euclidean Data. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 34, 18-42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] Hamilton, W.L., Ying, R. and Leskovec, J. (2017) Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, 4-9 December 2017, 1025-1035.
[38] Kipf, T.N. and Welling, M. (2016) Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks. 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, Toulon, 24-26 April 2017.
https://mlanthology.org/iclr/2017/kipf2017iclr-semi/
[39] Velikovi, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., et al. (2017) Graph Attention Networks. 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, Vancouver, 30 April-3 May 2017.
https://mlanthology.org/iclr/2018/velickovic2018iclr-graph/
[40] Defferrard, M., Bresson, X. and Vandergheynst, P. (2016) Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filtering. The Fortieth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Sydney, 6-12 December 2016.
https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2016/file/04df4d434d481c5bb723be1b6df1ee65-Paper.pdf
[41] Hajgat’o, G., Gyires-T’oth, B.A. and Pa’al, G. (2021) Reconstructing Nodal Pressures in Water Distribution Systems with Graph Neural Networks.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.13619
[42] Tsiami, L. and Makropoulos, C. (2021) Cyber-Physical Attack Detection in Water Distribution Systems with Temporal Graph Convolutional Neural Networks. Water, 13, Article No. 1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[43] Zanfei, A., Brentan, B.M., Menapace, A., Righetti, M. and Herrera, M. (2022) Graph Convolutional Recurrent Neural Networks for Water Demand Forecasting. Water Resources Research, 58, e2022WR032299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[44] Cai, S., Mao, Z., Wang, Z., Yin, M. and Karniadakis, G.E. (2021) Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for Fluid Mechanics: A Review. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 37, 1727-1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[45] Lu, L., Meng, X., Mao, Z., et al. (2019) DeepXDE: A Deep Learning Library for Solving Differential Equations. SIAM Review, 63, 208-228.
[46] Cuomo, S., Di Cola, V.S., Giampaolo, F., Rozza, G., Raissi, M. and Piccialli, F. (2022) Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where We Are and What’s Next. Journal of Scientific Computing, 92, Article No. 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[47] Willard, J., Jia, X., Xu, S., Steinbach, M. and Kumar, V. (2022) Integrating Scientific Knowledge with Machine Learning for Engineering and Environmental Systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 55, 1-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[48] Romano, M., Kapelan, Z. and Savić, D.A. (2014) Automated Detection of Pipe Bursts and Other Events in Water Distribution Systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140, 457-467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[49] Saldarriaga, J.G., Solarte, L., Salcedo, C., et al. (2020) Battle of the Leakage Detection and Isolation Methods: An Energy Method Analysis Using Genetic Algorithms.
https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:244969183
[50] Fan, X., Zhang, X. and Yu, X.B. (2021) Machine Learning Model and Strategy for Fast and Accurate Detection of Leaks in Water Supply Network. Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience, 2, Article No. 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[51] Daniel, I., Pesantez, J., Letzgus, S., Khaksar Fasaee, M.A., Alghamdi, F., Berglund, E., et al. (2022) A Sequential Pressure-Based Algorithm for Data-Driven Leakage Identification and Model-Based Localization in Water Distribution Networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 148, Article 04022025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[52] Xing, L. and Sela, L. (2022) Graph Neural Networks for State Estimation in Water Distribution Systems: Application of Supervised and Semisupervised Learning. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 148, Article 04022018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[53] Kerimov, B., Bentivoglio, R., Garzón, A., Isufi, E., Tscheikner-Gratl, F., Steffelbauer, D.B., et al. (2023) Assessing the Performances and Transferability of Graph Neural Network Metamodels for Water Distribution Systems. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 25, 2223-2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[54] Zhou, X., Tang, Z., Xu, W., Meng, F., Chu, X., Xin, K., et al. (2019) Deep Learning Identifies Accurate Burst Locations in Water Distribution Networks. Water Research, 166, Article ID: 115058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[55] Ashraf, I., Strotherm, J., Hermes, L. and Hammer, B. (2024) Physics-Informed Graph Neural Networks for Water Distribution Systems. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 38, 21905-21913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[56] Sun, L., Gao, H., Pan, S. and Wang, J. (2020) Surrogate Modeling for Fluid Flows Based on Physics-Constrained Deep Learning without Simulation Data. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 361, Article ID: 112732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[57] Garzón, A., Kapelan, Z., Langeveld, J. and Taormina, R. (2022) Machine Learning-Based Surrogate Modeling for Urban Water Networks: Review and Future Research Directions. Water Resources Research, 58, e2021WR031808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[58] Mounce, S.R., Boxall, J.B. and Machell, J. (2010) Development and Verification of an Online Artificial Intelligence System for Detection of Bursts and Other Abnormal Flows. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 136, 309-318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[59] Bakker, M., Vreeburg, J.H.G., van Schagen, K.M. and Rietveld, L.C. (2013) A Fully Adaptive Forecasting Model for Short-Term Drinking Water Demand. Environmental Modelling & Software, 48, 141-151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[60] Ye, G. and Fenner, R.A. (2011) Kalman Filtering of Hydraulic Measurements for Burst Detection in Water Distribution Systems. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 2, 14-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[61] Eliades, D.G. and Polycarpou, M.M. (2010) A Fault Diagnosis and Security Framework for Water Systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 18, 1254-1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[62] Taormina, R. and Galelli, S. (2018) Deep-Learning Approach to the Detection and Localization of Cyber-Physical Attacks on Water Distribution Systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[63] Lima, G.M., Brentan, B.M., Manzi, D. and Luvizotto, E. (2018) Metamodel for Nodal Pressure Estimation at near Real-Time in Water Distribution Systems Using Artificial Neural Networks. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 20, 486-496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[64] Pesantez, J.E., Berglund, E.Z. and Kaza, N. (2020) Smart Meters Data for Modeling and Forecasting Water Demand at the User-Level. Environmental Modelling & Software, 125, Article ID: 104633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[65] Zanfei, A., Menapace, A., Brentan, B.M., Righetti, M. and Herrera, M. (2022) Novel Approach for Burst Detection in Water Distribution Systems Based on Graph Neural Networks. Sustainable Cities and Society, 86, Article ID: 104090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[66] Hawari, A., Alkadour, F., Elmasry, M. and Zayed, T. (2020) A State of the Art Review on Condition Assessment Models Developed for Sewer Pipelines. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 93, Article ID: 103721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[67] Cheng, J.C.P. and Wang, M. (2018) Automated Detection of Sewer Pipe Defects in Closed-Circuit Television Images Using Deep Learning Techniques. Automation in Construction, 95, 155-171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[68] Yin, X., Chen, Y., Bouferguene, A., Zaman, H., Al-Hussein, M. and Kurach, L. (2020) A Deep Learning-Based Framework for an Automated Defect Detection System for Sewer Pipes. Automation in Construction, 109, Article ID: 102967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[69] Wang, M. and Cheng, J.C.P. (2020) A Unified Convolutional Neural Network Integrated with Conditional Random Field for Pipe Defect Segmentation. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 35, 162-177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[70] Mosavi, A., Öztürk, P. and Chau, K.-W. (2018) Flood Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: Literature Review. Water, 10, Article No. 1536.
[71] Berkhahn, S., Fuchs, L. and Neuweiler, I. (2019) An Ensemble Neural Network Model for Real-Time Prediction of Urban Floods. Journal of Hydrology, 575, 743-754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[72] Guo, Z., Leitão, J.P., Simões, N.E. and Moosavi, V. (2020) Data‐Driven Flood Emulation: Speeding up Urban Flood Predictions by Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 14, e12684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[73] Chang, F., Chen, P., Lu, Y., Huang, E. and Chang, K. (2014) Real-Time Multi-Step-Ahead Water Level Forecasting by Recurrent Neural Networks for Urban Flood Control. Journal of Hydrology, 517, 836-846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[74] Wei, X. and Kusiak, A. (2015) Short-Term Prediction of Influent Flow in Wastewater Treatment Plant. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 29, 241-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[75] Mounce, S.R., Shepherd, W., Sailor, G., Shucksmith, J. and Saul, A.J. (2014) Predicting Combined Sewer Overflows Chamber Depth Using Artificial Neural Networks with Rainfall Radar Data. Water Science and Technology, 69, 1326-1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[76] Taloma, R.J.L., Cuomo, F., Comminiello, D. and Pisani, P. (2025) Machine Learning for Smart Water Distribution Systems: Exploring Applications, Challenges and Future Perspectives. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58, Article No. 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[77] Aziz, R., Banerjee, S., Bouzefrane, S. and Le Vinh, T. (2023) Exploring Homomorphic Encryption and Differential Privacy Techniques towards Secure Federated Learning Paradigm. Future Internet, 15, Article No. 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[78] Jouini, O., Sethom, K., Namoun, A., Aljohani, N., Alanazi, M.H. and Alanazi, M.N. (2024) A Survey of Machine Learning in Edge Computing: Techniques, Frameworks, Applications, Issues, and Research Directions. Technologies, 12, Article No. 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[79] Brentan, B.M., Menapace, A., Oberascher, M., Herrera, M. and Sitzenfrei, R. (2025) Enhancing Explainable AI with Graph Signal Processing: Applications in Water Distribution Systems. Water Research, 285, Article ID: 124022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[80] Lundberg, S.M. and Lee, S.I. (2017) A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In: Guyon, I., Luxburg, U.V., Bengio, S., et al., Eds., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, Curran Associates, Inc., 4765-4774.
[81] Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S. and Guestrin, C. (2016) “Why Should I Trust You?” Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, 13-17 August 2016, 1135-1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[82] Fuertes, P.C., Alzamora, F.M., Carot, M.H. and Alonso Campos, J.C. (2020) Building and Exploiting a Digital Twin for the Management of Drinking Water Distribution Networks. Urban Water Journal, 17, 704-713.
[83] Bommasani, R., Hudson, D.A., Adeli, E., et al. (2021) On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07258
[84] Hajgató, G., Paál, G. and Gyires-Tóth, B. (2020) Deep Reinforcement Learning for Real-Time Optimization of Pumps in Water Distribution Systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 146, Article ID: 04020079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef