社交电商情绪驱动互动策略推荐模型及实证研究——基于SOR理论模型
Emotion-Driven Interaction Strategy Recommendation Model and Empirical Research in Social Commerce—Based on the SOR Theoretical Model
DOI: 10.12677/wer.2026.153047, PDF,   
作者: 林盈希:广东财经大学经济学院,广东 广州;李雄英:广东财经大学统计与数据科学学院,广东 广州
关键词: 社交电商SOR理论情绪驱动互动策略Social Commerce SOR Theory Emotion-Driven Interaction Strategy
摘要: 在数字经济背景下,情绪经济已成为消费市场增长的关键动力,以Z世代为代表的消费者正从“物质满足”转向“情绪悦己”。针对社交电商互动策略同质化、情绪适配性不足的问题,本研究基于SOR理论构建情绪驱动的互动策略推荐模型,利用10万条用户行为面板数据,验证了情绪–策略匹配效应、递进式互动路径及关键变量调节机制,并提出“用户细分–策略预测”两阶段技术架构,为社交电商精细化、情绪化运营提供可行方案。
Abstract: In the digital economy, the emotional economy is a key growth drive in consumer markets, particularly as Generation Z shifts from material satisfaction to emotional self-gratification. To overcome the homogeneity and low emotional adaptability of social e-commerce interaction strategies, this study builds an emotion-driven recommendation model based on SOR theory. Using panel data from 100,000 users, we validate the emotion-strategy matching effect, the progressive interaction pathway, and key moderating mechanisms. We then propose a two-stage “user segmentation-strategy prediction” framework, offering a practical solution for refined, emotion-aware social e-commerce operations.
文章引用:林盈希, 李雄英. 社交电商情绪驱动互动策略推荐模型及实证研究——基于SOR理论模型[J]. 世界经济探索, 2026, 15(3): 460-472. https://doi.org/10.12677/wer.2026.153047

参考文献

[1] 苏玉波, 李浩. 数字时代情绪经济的发生机理、异化景象与进阶探索[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2025, 42(5): 140-148.
[2] Li, L., Chen, X. and Zhu, P. (2024) How Do E-Commerce Anchors’ Characteristics Influence Consumers’ Impulse Buying? An Emotional Contagion Perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, Article ID: 103587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Dua, P. (2024) Building Purchase Intention through Live Streaming Platforms: Mediating Role of Customer Engagement. Journal of Promotion Management, 30, 657-680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Guo, G., Li, Y. and Zhong, J. (2024) The Effect of Perceived Value on College Students’ Purchasing Behavior in Live Streaming. International Journal of Business and Management, 19, 103-120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Mehrabian, A. and Russell, J.A. (1974) An Approach to Environmental Psychology. The MIT Press.
[6] 赵洁, 高佳艺. 电商直播中主播互动性、感知价值与用户参与行为——基于SOR理论的视角[J]. 重庆科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(4): 1-13.
[7] Xia, Y.X., Chae, S.W. and Xiang, Y.C. (2024) How Social and Media Cues Induce Live Streaming Impulse Buying? SOR Model Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article ID: 1379992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Liu, Y., Li, Q., Edu, T., Fam, K., Zaharia, R. and Negricea, C. (2023) Mobile Social Commerce Content, Consumer Emotions and Behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47, 1315-1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Hongsuchon, T., Chen, S. and Khan, A. (2025) Applying the S-O-R Model to Explore Impulsive Buying Behavior Driven by Influencers on Social Commerce Websites. PeerJ Computer Science, 11, e3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 许嘉仪, 林恬恬, 甘春梅. 社会化商务情境下用户行为影响因素研究: 基于S-O-R模型[J]. 知识管理论坛, 2017, 2(1): 55-68.
[11] 杨文君. 基于SOR模型的社交平台用户持续使用意愿研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 中南财经政法大学, 2022.
[12] 张府鹃. 电商直播营销中银发消费者对悦己类消费品的冲动消费影响机制研究——基于SOR理论与社会情绪选择理论的实证分析[J]. 中国科技投资, 2025(25): 72-75+120.
[13] 潘建林, 汪彬, 董晓晨. 基于SICAS消费者行为模型的社交电商模式及比较研究[J]. 企业经济, 2020, 39(10): 37-43.
[14] 王志冉, 王甜甜, 吴蒋蒙, 等. 社交电商UGC分享式推荐对消费者购买意愿影响研究[J]. 中国市场, 2024(11): 121-125.
[15] Sharma, S. and Sharma, A. (2025) Investigating the Drivers and Outcomes of Shopping App Engagement—An Application of the SOR Framework. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 1-14.
[16] 廖晨, 许燕. 基于SOR理论的社群电商消费者购买行为影响因素研究——以微信平台为例[J]. 中国市场, 2024(30): 135-138.
[17] 肖开红, 雷兵. 意见领袖特质、促销刺激与社交电商消费者购买意愿——基于微信群购物者的调查研究[J]. 管理学刊, 2021, 34(1): 99-110.
[18] 聂烜, 沈鹏熠, 许基南. 新媒体环境下网红代言对品牌价值的影响机制: 粉丝参与的中介作用[J]. 当代财经, 2024(4): 99-112.
[19] 魏华, 黄金红. 在线评论对消费者购买决策的影响——产品卷入度和专业能力的调节作用[J]. 中国流通经济, 2017, 31(11): 78-84.
[20] 朱丽叶, 袁登华, 张静宜. 在线用户评论质量与评论者等级对消费者购买意愿的影响——产品卷入度的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(2): 87-96.
[21] 周冬梅. 商家负面评论回复方式对消费者购买意愿的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 东北财经大学, 2020.