政府引导基金对企业ESG表现的影响研究综述
A Review of Research on the Impact of Government-Guided Funds on Corporate ESG Performance
摘要: 政府引导基金是政府以市场化方式配置财政资金、撬动社会资本的重要政策性金融工具。本文系统梳理政府引导基金与企业ESG表现相关文献,发现政府引导基金区别于财政补贴、绿色信贷和普通风险投资,兼具政策导向、权益资本属性、市场化筛选和投后治理功能,能够通过融资约束缓解、创新驱动、治理优化和供应链赋能路径促进企业ESG实践。然而,其政策效果受基金市场化程度、地区制度环境、企业生命周期及ESG分项差异等因素制约。现有研究已初步揭示政府引导基金对企业ESG表现的积极作用,但在基金异质性、机制链条、真实ESG行为识别、E/S/G分项效应和长期动态影响方面仍存在拓展空间。未来应深化政策性资本理论分析,细化ESG分项研究,并关注基金的长期动态效应。
Abstract: Government guidance funds are important policy financial tools through which the government allocates fiscal funds in a market-oriented manner and leverages social capital. This paper systematically reviews literature related to government guidance funds and corporate ESG performance, finding that government guidance funds differ from fiscal subsidies, green credit, and ordinary venture capital. They combine policy orientation, equity capital characteristics, market-based selection, and post-investment governance functions, and can promote corporate ESG practices through financing constraint alleviation, innovation-driven growth, governance optimization, and supply chain empowerment. However, their policy effectiveness is constrained by factors such as the market orientation of the fund, regional institutional environment, corporate lifecycle, and ESG sub-component differences. Existing research has preliminarily revealed the positive impact of government guidance funds on corporate ESG performance, but there remains room for expansion regarding fund heterogeneity, mechanism chains, identification of real ESG behavior, effects on E/S/G sub-components, and long-term dynamic impacts. Future research should deepen the theoretical analysis of policy capital, refine ESG sub-component studies, and pay attention to the long-term dynamic effects of funds.
文章引用:程文哲. 政府引导基金对企业ESG表现的影响研究综述[J]. 商业全球化, 2026, 14(3): 170-177. https://doi.org/10.12677/bglo.2026.143018

参考文献

[1] Friede, G., Busch, T. and Bassen, A. (2015) ESG and Financial Performance: Aggregated Evidence from More than 2000 Empirical Studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5, 210-233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Lerner, J. (1999) The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long‐Run Impact of the SBIR Program. The Journal of Business, 72, 285-318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Brander, J.A., Du, Q. and Hellmann, T. (2015) The Effects of Government-Sponsored Venture Capital: International Evidence. Review of Finance, 19, 571-618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 陈彤, 聂常虹, 高翔, 等. 政府引导基金参与风险投资对企业创新的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2025, 46(7): 132-143.
[5] 付馨苇, 谢家智. 政府引导基金、技术多样化与企业双元创新——兼论创新型产业集群的调节作用[J]. 财经论丛(浙江财经大学学报), 2025(8): 17-27.
[6] Guerini, M. and Quas, A. (2016) Governmental Venture Capital in Europe: Screening and Certification. Journal of Business Venturing, 31, 175-195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Wallsten, S.J. (2000) The Effects of Government-Industry R&D Programs on Private R&D: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program. The RAND Journal of Economics, 31, 82-100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 胡勇. 政府引导基金促进企业“融资造血” [J]. 经济问题探索, 2022(6): 106-110.
[9] 徐玉德, 刘晓颖, 邓扬. 政府引导基金与企业供应链话语权关系研究[J]. 财政研究, 2025(5): 60-70.
[10] 孟淑岩. 供应链金融对流通企业ESG表现的影响——基于融资约束的中介效应分析[J]. 商业经济研究, 2025(16): 179-182.
[11] 曾慧, 何宏伟, 晁楚楚. 营商环境优化对企业ESG表现的影响研究[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2025(8): 60-71.
[12] 张成, 曹林楠. 企业数字化转型、ESG表现与绿色创新绩效[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 58(5): 104-109.
[13] 石青梅, 高雅珊, 张赛男. 从控制缺位到责任缺失: 双无控制对企业ESG表现的影响研究[J]. 会计与经济研究, 2024, 38(5): 44-62.
[14] 方先明, 胡丁. 企业ESG表现与创新——来自A股上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(2): 91-106.
[15] 安然, 陈艺毛. 企业ESG表现、研发投入与出口绩效提升[J]. 经济纵横, 2023(8): 98-106.
[16] 屈文彬, 宋海燕. 政府补助对企业ESG表现的影响研究——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2024, 40(12): 1855-1863.
[17] 王禹, 王浩宇, 薛爽. 税制绿色化与企业ESG表现——基于《环境保护税法》的准自然实验[J]. 财经研究, 2022, 48(9): 47-62.
[18] 许志勇, 果思畅, 张梦, 等. 政府引导基金与企业ESG表现: 效应与机制[J]. 南开管理评论, 2026, 29(3): 16-27+52.
[19] 胡浩志, 朱方政. 政府引导基金与企业ESG表现[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 78(6): 125-138.
[20] 周波, 孔欣悦, 刘晶. 政府引导基金改善资本错配的效应与机制研究[J]. 财经问题研究, 2025(5): 80-92.
[21] 张淑霞, 谢娴, 金梦萱. 政府绿色引导基金对企业ESG表现的影响研究——基于多期双重差分模型的实证检验[J]. 工业技术经济, 2026, 45(3): 135-146.