《中华人民共和国民法典》背景下夫妻忠诚协议研究
Research on Marital Loyalty Agreement under the Background of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China
DOI: 10.12677/ds.2026.127210, PDF,   
作者: 谭鑫笛:青岛科技大学法学院,山东 青岛
关键词: 民法典忠实义务夫妻忠诚协议Civil Code Duty of Loyalty Marital Fidelity Agreement
摘要: 本文以《民法典》体系为框架,结合其基本原则与制度理念,论证夫妻忠实义务兼具道德规范与法律义务的双重属性,为分析忠诚协议的法律地位奠定了法理基础。在此基础上,重点依据合同编第464条关于身份关系协议可参照适用合同规定的制度安排,阐释将忠诚协议纳入民事法律行为体系的可能性与正当性。针对当前司法实践中存在的法律适用不一、无过错方权益保障不足及赔偿标准混乱等问题,本文通过实证研究方法,梳理《民法典》实施后的相关裁判案例,指出制度层面的缺失与困境。在此基础上,从统一法律适用、构建婚内损害赔偿机制以及优化举证规则等方面提出完善建议,以期在尊重当事人意思自治的同时强化对婚姻中忠诚一方合法权益的保障,实现法律规范与婚姻伦理的价值协同。
Abstract: This article uses the systematic framework of the Civil Code, combined with its basic principles and institutional concepts, to argue that the faithful obligation of husband and wife has the dual attributes of both moral norms and legal obligations. In order to analyze the law of loyalty agreement the legal status lays the foundation of law. On this basis, according to Article 464 of the contract on the identity relationship agreement, the possibility and legitimacy of integrating the loyalty agreement into the civil legal conduct system can be explained with reference to the institutional arrangements applicable to the provisions of the contract. In view of the problems such as inconsistency of law application, insufficient protection of the rights and interests of the non-fault party and the confusion of compensation standards in current judicial practice, this article conducts empirical research on all laws, sorts out relevant judgment cases after the implementation of the Civil Code, and points out the shortcomings and difficulties at the institutional level. On this basis, improve suggestions are put forward in terms of unifying the application of law, building a compensation mechanism for damages in marriage, and optimizing the rules of proof, in order to strengthen the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the loyal party in marriage while respecting the autonomy of the parties, and realize the value coordination of legal norms and marriage ethics.
文章引用:谭鑫笛. 《中华人民共和国民法典》背景下夫妻忠诚协议研究[J]. 争议解决, 2026, 12(7): 35-41. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2026.127210

参考文献

[1] 埃德加·博登海默. 法理学: 法律哲学与法律方法[M]. 邓正来, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2004: 504.
[2] 康德. 法的形而上学理论——权利的科学[M]. 沈叔平, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1991: 89.
[3] 马克思·韦伯. 论经济与社会中的法律[M]. 张乃根, 译. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 1998: 105.
[4] 闵卫国. 论夫妻忠诚协议与离婚损害赔偿[J]. 法律适用. 2013(5): 54-57.
[5] 姚邢. 民法典体系化视野下的夫妻忠诚协议研究[J]. 法学家, 2024(2): 85-98.
[6] 黄海涛. 婚姻纠纷裁判思路与疑难案例[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2018: 83.