全球化产业链供应链韧性的系统解构与提升路径——基于管理工程的视角
Systematic Deconstruction and Enhancing Paths of Global Industrial and Supply Chain Resilience—From a Management Engineering Perspective
摘要: 在全球化深入推进与外部环境不确定性显著上升的背景下,产业链供应链的稳定性和风险抵御能力对产业发展与经济安全至关重要。本文基于管理工程与系统工程视角,系统界定全球化语境下产业链供应链韧性的内涵,明确其复杂性、动态性、系统性关键特征;从外部环境、产业内部、企业主体三个维度,剖析贸易政策、市场波动、产业布局、技术创新、供应链管理及协同水平等核心影响因素;针对现有研究静态化、对策碎片化的不足,构建多层次一体化分析框架,提出优化全球与区域布局、强化技术创新与数字化转型、深化企业协同治理、健全风险预警与应急响应四大提升路径。研究表明,产业链供应链韧性是系统抵御冲击、快速恢复、动态适应与持续创新的综合能力,其提升需依托多主体协同、全链条优化与动态治理。本文丰富了产业链供应链韧性的理论体系,可为企业优化供应链管理、政府完善产业政策、构建自主可控、安全高效、具有强韧性的现代产业体系提供理论支撑与实践参考。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of deepening globalization and growing external uncertainty, the stability and risk resilience of industrial chains and supply chains have become critical to industrial development and economic security. Adopting perspectives from management engineering and systems engineering, this study systematically conceptualizes the connotation and key characteristics of industrial and supply chain resilience in the global context, namely complexity, dynamics, and systematicness. It further explores the core influencing factors, such as trade policies, market fluctuations, industrial layout, technological innovation, supply chain management, and collaboration levels from three dimensions: external environment, industrial internal conditions, and enterprise-level capabilities. To address the limitations of static analysis and fragmented strategies in existing literature, this paper constructs a multi-level integrated analytical framework and proposes four pathways to enhance resilience: optimizing global and regional layout, strengthening technological innovation and digital transformation, deepening multi-stakeholder collaborative governance, and improving risk early warning and emergency response mechanisms. The results show that industrial and supply chain resilience represents a comprehensive capacity to resist shocks, recover rapidly, adapt dynamically, and innovate sustainably, which relies on cross-agent coordination, chain-wide optimization, and dynamic governance. This research enriches the theoretical system of industrial and supply chain resilience and provides theoretical support and practical implications for enterprises to improve supply chain management and for governments to formulate industrial policies, so as to build an independent, controllable, safe, efficient, and highly resilient modern industrial system.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Ponomarov, S.Y. and Holcomb, M.C. (2009) Understanding the Concept of Supply Chain Resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20, 124-143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
Christopher, M. and Peck, H. (2004) Building the Resilient Supply Chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
黄群慧, 倪红福. 基于价值链理论的产业基础能力与产业链水平提升研究[J]. 经济体制改革, 2020(5): 11-21.
|
|
[4]
|
魏龙, 蔡培民, 潘安. 供应链冲击、多元化战略与企业发展韧性——来自中国重大自然灾害的证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2024(9): 118-136.
|
|
[5]
|
孙文杰. 企业数字化、关系网络位置与供应链韧性提升[J]. 经济经纬, 2026, 43(1): 147-160.
|
|
[6]
|
蒋忠中, 郭佳润, 郑伟. 供应链韧性: 研究综述与展望[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 46(7): 59-70.
|
|
[7]
|
刘志彪, 刁璟璐, 李健. “链主”治理、全球产业网络嵌入与产业链韧性[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2025, 47(12): 65-77.
|
|
[8]
|
钟湘玥. 数字技术影响制造业供应链韧性的机理分析[J]. 物流科技, 2025, 48(10): 136-139, 142.
|
|
[9]
|
宋冬林, 刘甫钧, 丁文龙. 新质生产力视角下关键节点数字供应链建设对上下游供应链韧性的影响[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2025(2): 136-154, 207-208.
|
|
[10]
|
陶锋, 王欣然, 徐扬, 等. 数字化转型、产业链供应链韧性与企业生产率[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(5): 118-136.
|
|
[11]
|
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997) Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[12]
|
Liao, G., Zhang, Y., Li, S. and Zhang, Y. (2026) Patient Capital and Supply Chain Resilience: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. Systems, 14, Article 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[13]
|
李晓华. 新发展格局下提升产业链供应链韧性与安全的难点与着力点[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 45(5): 67-76, 2.
|
|
[14]
|
张广乐, 李海涛. 创新驱动政策能否增强产业链供应链韧性?——来自国家创新型城市试点政策的经验证据[J]. 商业研究, 2025(1): 29-37.
|
|
[15]
|
刘敏, 杨晨琳, 吴俊涛. 全球产业链重构下数字经济提升中国产业链韧性的机理和实现路径[J]. 新经济, 2024(2): 33-47.
|