对我国商业银行的风险管理研究
Research on Risk Management of Commercial Banks in China
DOI: 10.12677/fin.2026.164043, PDF,   
作者: 郑奕滨:广西大学,中国–东盟经济学院/经济学院/中国东盟金融合作学院,广西 南宁
关键词: 商业银行风险管理金融科技Commercial Banks Risk Management Fintech
摘要: 在我国商业银行面临信用风险、市场风险、操作风险及新兴技术风险交织叠加的复杂局面下,本文系统剖析了商业银行风险管理的现状、成因与主要问题。研究发现,传统风险敞口如地方债务与房地产不良贷款,同金融科技技术漏洞等新型风险并存,且中小银行与大型银行在科技投入与数据治理上的差距加剧了风险防控的马太效应。在此基础上,本文重点探讨了区块链、大数据、人工智能等金融科技在风险识别、监测与控制中的应用机制,并分析了区块链福费廷交易平台与智能风控系统等典型案例。研究表明,共建跨机构数字平台以实现数据共享与风险联防、优化内部治理架构与流程管控、加强外部市场风险动态对冲及跨境业务合规管理,是提升商业银行风险抵御能力的核心路径。数字化转型与协同治理能够有效降低不良率并提升审批效率,为维护金融体系稳定与服务金融强国目标提供微观层面的解决方案。
Abstract: Under the complex situation where commercial banks in China face the intertwined risks of credit risk, market risk, operational risk, and emerging technology risks, this paper systematically analyzes the current state, causes, and major problems of risk management in commercial banks. The study finds that traditional risk exposures, such as non-performing loans related to local government debt and real estate, coexist with new types of risks like fintech technology vulnerabilities. Moreover, the gap in technology investment and data governance between small and medium-sized banks and large banks exacerbates the Matthew effect in risk prevention and control. On this basis, the paper focuses on the application mechanisms of fintech technologies such as blockchain, big data, and artificial intelligence in risk identification, monitoring, and control, and analyzes typical cases including the blockchain-based forfeiting trading platform and intelligent risk control systems. The research indicates that building cross-institutional digital platforms to achieve data sharing and joint risk defense, optimizing internal governance structures and process controls, and strengthening dynamic hedging of external market risks as well as compliance management of cross-border businesses are core pathways to enhance the risk resilience of commercial banks. Digital transformation and collaborative governance can effectively reduce non-performing loan ratios and improve approval efficiency, providing micro-level solutions for maintaining financial system stability and serving the financial power goal.
文章引用:郑奕滨. 对我国商业银行的风险管理研究[J]. 金融, 2026, 16(4): 429-435. https://doi.org/10.12677/fin.2026.164043

参考文献

[1] 张婷希, 项后军. 地方债务影响了银行风险吗?——以地方商业银行为例[J]. 云南财经大学学报, 2023, 39(3): 60-80.
[2] 李兴凤. 商业银行流动性错配同群效应研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(20): 127-131.
[3] 周珏印. 基于时频分析的我国商业银行研究间风险溢出效应[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 华东交通大学, 2024.
[4] Mishchenko, S., Naumenkova, S., Mishchenko, V. and Dorofeiev, D. (2021) Innovation Risk Management in Financial Institutions. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18, 190-202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 孟平, 费莉雯, 高超群, 等. 存款准备金率变动对我国商业银行流动性的影响——基于VAR模型和脉冲响应函数的实证研究[J]. 现代金融, 2024(3): 26-32.
[6] 张晋, 许达. 商业银行内部控制与风险管理能力——基于我国上市商业银行的实证分析[J]. 武汉金融, 2019(6): 66-70.
[7] 孙洋. 探究我国商业银行操作风险管理方法——以新巴塞尔协议为纲[J]. 现代商业, 2020(7): 122-123.
[8] 徐蕾. 数字化转型如何赋能商业银行风险管理——兼论数字赋能质效的“马太效应” [J]. 金融发展研究, 2024(10): 36-49.
[9] 李建军, 姜世超. 银行金融科技与普惠金融的商业可持续性——财务增进效应的微观证据[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2021, 21(3): 889-908.
[10] Baltas, N.K. and Zegarra, L.M.J. (2024) Efficiency and Financial Risk Management Practices of Microfinance Institutions. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 30, 1011-1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 高欣, 刘鹤. 我国商业银行风险管理体系存在的问题及对策[J]. 金融科技时代, 2025, 33(1): 47-50.
[12] 田继敏. 商业银行新型风险管理研究: 新形势、新挑战、新方法[J]. 农银学刊, 2024(5): 4-8.