清代登封焦氏家族与《登封县志》编纂研究
A Study on the Dengfeng Jiao Clan (Qing Dynasty) and the Compilation of “Dengfeng County Gazetteer”
摘要: 登封作为“天地之中”历史文化核心区,清代所修五部《登封县志》中,本土焦氏家族历经顺治、康熙、乾隆三朝,累计参与三部志书的编纂:焦复亨修顺治九年(1651)本、焦钦宠修康熙三十五年(1696)本、焦如蘅修乾隆九年(1743)本,形成了独特的家族代际修志传统。焦氏凭借科举传承积淀的文化素养、官宦背景奠定的地方声望、深厚的交游网络及前代修志实践积累的学术权威,获官方持续聘任。其编纂实践推动《登封县志》的史料来源从零散旧志与传闻转向旧志残册、官方典册、山志专书、实物史料与实地踏勘相结合的多元实证体系;编纂原则确立起史料实证导向;体例从粗放混杂转变为系统规范的纲–目体系,并强化嵩山文化标识与本土贤达事迹记载,凸显地域特色。作为清代地方士绅介入地域文化建构的典型个案,焦氏家族的修志实践深刻揭示了士绅家族学术传统对地方文献质量的关键影响,是明清方志纂修中家族文化与方志编纂互相影响的典型样本。
Abstract: As the core area of the historical culture of “the Centre of Heaven and Earth”, Dengfeng saw five editions of “Dengfeng County Gazetteer” compiled in the Qing Dynasty. Among them, the local Jiao clan participated in the compilation of three gazetteers successively across the reigns of the Shunzhi, Kangxi, and Qianlong emperors: Jiao Fuheng compiled the 1651 (9th year of Shunzhi) edition, Jiao Qinchong the 1696 (35th year of Kangxi) edition, and Jiao Ruheng the 1743 (9th year of Qianlong) edition, forming a unique inter generational tradition of gazetteer compilation within the clan. Endowed with cultural literacy accumulated through imperial examination heritage, local prestige established by official backgrounds, extensive social networks, and academic authority forged by previous gazetteer compilation practices, the Jiao clan was continuously appointed by the official authorities. Their compilation efforts transformed the historical sources of “Dengfeng County Gazetteer” from scattered old records and hearsay into a diversified empirical system integrating remnant old gazetteers, official archives, specialized mountain records, physical historical materials, and on-site investigations. They established a compilation principle oriented toward historical textual research; the stylistic structure evolved from a rough and unsystematic form to a standardized hierarchical system of categories and subcategories, with enhanced emphasis on the cultural symbols of Songshan Mountain and records of local elites, highlighting regional characteristics. As a typical case of local gentry participating in the construction of regional culture in the Qing Dynasty, the Jiao clan’s gazetteer compilation practice profoundly reveals the crucial influence of the academic tradition of gentry clans on the quality of local documents, serving as a representative example of the interaction between clan culture and local gazetteer compilation in the Ming and Qing dynasties.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
陈尚敏. 清代甘肃科举家族与地方社会[J]. 地方文化研究, 2021, 9(4): 60-68.
|
|
[2]
|
刘京臣. 大数据视阈中的宋代进士家族研究——基于“历代进士登科数据库”及方志等文献的考察[J]. 中国地方志, 2023(4): 111-122+128.
|
|
[3]
|
吕涵, 周扬波. 南宋苏州士绅的家族和活动——以范成大为核心[J]. 湖州师范学院学报, 2024, 46(7): 20-29.
|
|
[4]
|
秦浩翔. 清中后期边疆地方志的土司书写与权力表达——以桂西道光《白山司志》与光绪《百色厅志》为例[J]. 地方文化研究, 2024, 12(2): 90-101.
|
|
[5]
|
黄伟, 巴兆祥. 明清土司司所志编纂研究[J]. 中国地方志, 2023(3): 24-36+124-125.
|
|
[6]
|
刘曦. 官进绅退: 明清以降的地方志纂修——基于咸阳县志的历史考察[J]. 新楚文化, 2024(19): 4-7.
|
|
[7]
|
秦元元. 明清河南地方士绅与方志纂修研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 开封: 河南大学, 2015.
|
|
[8]
|
曲金燕. 论方志总纂的“谋私性”——以秦氏家族总纂无锡县志为例[J]. 今古文创, 2025(17): 46-48.
|
|
[9]
|
(清)张圣诰, 修, 焦钦宠, 纂. 登封县志[M]. 康熙三十五年(1696)刻本.
|
|
[10]
|
(清)景日昣. 嵩岳庙史[M]. 康熙三十五年(1696)太壹园刻本.
|
|
[11]
|
(清)孙居湜, 修, 董正, 纂. 河南府志[M]. 康熙三十四年(1695)刻本.
|
|
[12]
|
(清)施亦簪, 修, 焦如蘅, 纂. 登封县志[M]. 乾隆九年(1744)刻本.
|
|
[13]
|
(清)耿介. 敬恕堂文集[M]. 康熙四十八年(1709)刻本.
|
|
[14]
|
(清)叶封. 慕庐诗[M]. 清康熙刻本.
|
|
[15]
|
(清)张埙, 纂修. 登封县志[M]. 康熙二十年(1681)刻本.
|
|
[16]
|
(清)高一麟. 矩庵诗质[M]. 清刻本.
|
|
[17]
|
(清)张朝瑞, 修, 焦復亨, 纂. 登封县志[M]. 顺治九年(1652)刻本.
|
|
[18]
|
(清)景日昣. 说嵩[M]. 康熙五十五年(1716)刻本.
|
|
[19]
|
(明)王玉铉, 修, 侯泰, 纂. 登封县志[M]. 嘉靖八年(1557)刻本.
|
|
[20]
|
(后晋)刘昫, 撰, (清)沈德潜, 考证. 旧唐书[M]. 四库全书本.
|
|
[21]
|
(明)邓南金, 修, 李明通, 纂. 登封县志[M]. 隆庆三年(1569)刻本.
|
|
[22]
|
(清)叶封. 崇阳石刻集记[M]. 四库全书本.
|