轻罪治理背景下罪错未成年人分级处遇机制
研究
Research on the Graded Treatment Mechanism for Delinquent Minors in the Context of Minor Crime Governance
摘要: 在轻罪案件占比持续上升的犯罪结构变动下,轻罪治理已成为刑事司法体系现代化的关键命题。在此背景下,作为未成年人司法核心构成的罪错未成年人分级处遇机制,正面临从理念设计到实践落地的系统性困境。国家亲权理论与恢复性司法理念为其构筑了深厚的法理根基,而轻罪治理所秉持的“宽严相济”政策取向,则与之存在深层的内在逻辑耦合。然而,当前我国罪错未成年人分级处遇机制在实践中仍面临立法分散、分级标准模糊、处遇措施单一、程序保障不足以及社会支持体系薄弱等多重困境。为此,应当从明确罪错行为分级标准、优化分级处遇措施体系、健全程序性保障机制以及构建社会化支持网络等方面进行系统完善,推动建立符合中国特色的罪错未成年人分级处遇机制,实现保护社会与保障未成年人权益的双重目标。本文从轻罪治理视角切入,剖析罪错未成年人分级处遇机制的理论根基、实践困境与优化路径。
Abstract: Under the structural shift in crime characterized by a continuously rising proportion of minor offense cases, the governance of minor crimes has become a key proposition in the modernization of the criminal justice system. In this context, the graded treatment mechanism for delinquent minors, as a core component of juvenile justice, is confronting systemic difficulties from conceptual design to practical implementation. The doctrine of parens patriae and the concept of restorative justice have built a deep jurisprudential foundation for it, while the policy orientation of “balancing leniency and severity” upheld in minor crime governance has a profound intrinsic logical coupling with it. However, at present, China’s graded treatment mechanism for delinquent minors still faces multiple dilemmas in practice, including fragmented legislation, ambiguous grading standards, undiversified treatment measures, insufficient procedural safeguards, and a weak social support system. Therefore, systematic improvements should be made by clarifying the grading criteria for delinquent behaviors, optimizing the graded treatment measures system, strengthening procedural safeguard mechanisms, and building a socialized support network, so as to promote the establishment of a graded treatment mechanism for delinquent minors with Chinese characteristics and achieve the dual goals of protecting society and safeguarding the rights and interests of minors. This paper, from the perspective of minor crime governance, analyzes the theoretical foundations, practical difficulties, and optimization paths of the graded treatment mechanism for delinquent minors.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
黎宏, 袁方. 从消极惩罪到积极治理: 中国特色轻罪治理体系的反思与完善[J]. 中州学刊, 2024(4): 74-83+2.
|
|
[2]
|
吴羽. 罪错未成年人分级干预机制研究[J]. 犯罪研究, 2022(5): 23-34.
|
|
[3]
|
王译. 罪错未成年人分级处遇规则的体系建构[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2022(5): 117-132.
|
|
[4]
|
俞亮, 吕点点. 法国罪错未成年人分级处遇制度及其借鉴[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2020, 28(2): 155-176.
|
|
[5]
|
姚建龙. 未成年人罪错“四分说”的考量与立场——兼评新修订《预防未成年人犯罪法》[J]. 内蒙古社会科学, 2021, 42(2): 79-87+2.
|
|
[6]
|
杨莉. 罪错未成年分级处遇机制研究[J]. 河南广播电视大学学报, 2020, 33(4): 28-36.
|
|
[7]
|
刘芷君, 刘芷含, 卢莹莹. 论罪错未成年人分级处遇制度的本土化构建[J]. 广西警察学院学报, 2024, 37(6): 69-78.
|
|
[8]
|
贾健, 酒欣. 未成年人犯罪治理中的轻罪出罪路径探讨[J]. 江苏警官学院学报, 2024(5): 111-117.
|
|
[9]
|
何挺, 王力达. 我国未成年人犯罪刑法规范的理念更新与完善进路[J]. 人权, 2024(3): 86-103.
|
|
[10]
|
温望望, 董史统, 徐以诺. 轻罪治理背景下罪错未成年人分级干预矫治的实践难题及应对[J]. 中国法治, 2024(8): 34-38.
|
|
[11]
|
邱敏娜, 熊严秋, 杨雯清. 未成年人犯罪预防与轻罪治理的衔接机制研究[J]. 哈尔滨学院学报, 2025, 46(8): 71-74.
|
|
[12]
|
陈瑞华. 轻罪案件附条件不起诉制度研究[J]. 现代法学, 2023, 45(1): 145-163.
|