不同微生物菌剂对烤烟生长发育及生理特性的影响
Effects of Different Microbial Agents on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Flue-Cured Tobacco
DOI: 10.12677/hjas.2026.167121, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 喻奇伟, 李鹏志, 代园凤, 张铜津, 吴学巧, 李彩斌:贵州省烟草公司毕节市公司,贵州 毕节;计钰星*:河南农业大学烟草学院,河南 郑州
关键词: 烤烟光合细菌小球藻生理特性Flue-Cured Tobacco Photosynthetic Bacteria Chlorella Vulgaris Physiological Characteristics
摘要: 为了筛选出作用于烤烟的不同微生物菌剂及施用浓度,本试验以云烟87为研究对象,设置对照组(ck),将光合细菌稀释500 (g1)、300 (g2)、100 (g3)倍,小球藻稀释50 (x1)、100 (x2)、150 (x3)后喷施于烤烟叶片,对不同处理下烤烟叶片的生理特性进行比较。结果表明:(1) 与对照组相比,g2处理的茎围有显著提高,增幅为24.96%,g1、g2和g3处理的茎高有显著提高,增幅分别为19.85%、24.26%、18.75%,x3处理的最大叶长有显著提高,增幅为11.09%,x1、x2、x3处理的根系活力有显著提高,增幅分别为4.00%、7.78%、9.54%。(2) 与对照组相比,各处理的SOD活性均有显著性提高,其中x1处理增幅最大,为41.62%,x2处理的POD活性有显著提高,增幅为23.25%,各处理的CAT活性均有显著性提高,其中x1、x2处理增幅较大,分别为59.9%、63.09%。(3) 与对照组相比,g2、x2、x3处理的MDA含量有显著降低,降幅分别为15.51%、20.77%、23.67%。(4) 与对照组相比,各处理的可溶性蛋白和脯氨酸含量均有显著性提高。隶属函数综合分析结果表明,x3处理综合得分最高。
Abstract: In order to screen out the different microbial agents and application concentrations acting on flue-cured tobacco, Yunyan 87 was used as the research object in this experiment, and the control group (ck) was set up. Photosynthetic bacteria were diluted 500 (g1), 300 (g2), 100 (g3) times, and chlorella were diluted 50 (x1), 100 (x2), 150 (x3) and sprayed on flue-cured tobacco leaves to compare the physiological characteristics of flue-cured tobacco leaves under different treatments. The results showed that: (1) Compared with the control group, the stem circumference of g2 treatment was significantly increased by 24.96%, the stem height of g1, g2 and g3 treatments was significantly increased by 19.85%, 24.26% and 18.75% respectively, the maximum leaf length of x3 treatment was significantly increased by 11.09%, and the root activity of x1, x2 and x3 treatments was significantly increased by 4.00%, 7.78% and 9.54% respectively. (2) Compared with the control group, the SOD activity of each treatment was significantly increased, among which the x1 treatment increased the most, which was 41.62%, the POD activity of the x2 treatment was significantly increased, which was 23.25%, and the CAT activity of each treatment was significantly increased. Among them, the x1 and x2 treatments increased significantly, which were 59.9% and 63.09%, respectively. (3) Compared with the control group, the MDA content of g2, x2 and x3 treatments decreased significantly by 15.51%, 20.77% and 23.67%, respectively. (4) Compared with the control group, the soluble protein and proline content of each treatment were significantly increased. The comprehensive analysis results of membership function showed that the comprehensive score of g3 treatment was the highest.
文章引用:喻奇伟, 李鹏志, 代园凤, 张铜津, 吴学巧, 李彩斌, 计钰星. 不同微生物菌剂对烤烟生长发育及生理特性的影响[J]. 农业科学, 2026, 16(7): 997-1007. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjas.2026.167121

参考文献

[1] 刘光辉, 李迪秦, 陈一凡, 等. 烤烟生长发育特性及产质量对施肥技术的响应[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(10): 2032-2038.
[2] 赵玉芬, 尹应武. 我国肥料使用中存在的问题及对策[J]. 科学通报, 2015, 60(36): 3527-3534.
[3] 王记祥, 姚孙晨. 光合细菌特性及其应用研究进展[J]. 南方农业, 2025, 19(17): 146-150+162.
[4] 吴向华, 杨启银, 刘五星, 等. 光合细菌的研究进展及其应用[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2004, 6(2): 35-38.
[5] 韦梦洋, 罗贞宝, 贺帅, 等. 光合细菌与留叶数互作对烤烟生理代谢、化学品质及产量和质量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2025(3): 210-217.
[6] 王慧娟, 付小兰, 刘祥丽. 光合细菌在农业生产上的应用研究进展[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2013, 19(4): 26-27+42.
[7] 邹声浩, 喻奇伟, 贺帅, 等. 外源小球藻对干旱胁迫下烤烟幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报(中英文), 2025, 27(6): 64-71.
[8] 郝俊光, 潘喜芳, 莫维, 等. 小球藻作为食品利用的国外报道研究进展[J]. 中国酿造, 2022, 41(10): 18-24.
[9] 元文霞, 毕影东, 樊超, 等. 我国生物肥料的发展现状与应用[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2022(12): 4-9.
[10] 任超杰, 钟丹妮, 周民. 微藻在生物医学领域的研究进展[J]. 浙江大学学报(医学版), 2021, 50(2): 261-266.
[11] 郭宇双, 邓文超, 许亚东, 等.小球藻提高小麦磺胺甲恶唑抗性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(4): 1269-1278.
[12] 边建文, 崔岩, 杨宋琪, 等. 微藻生物肥料的农业应用研究进展[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(5): 1-9.
[13] Hussain, H.I., Kasinadhuni, N. and Arioli, T. (2021) The Effect of Seaweed Extract on Tomato Plant Growth, Productivity and Soil. Journal of Applied Phycology, 33, 1305-1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Lu, Y. and Xu, J. (2015) Phytohormones in Microalgae: A New Opportunity for Microalgal Biotechnology? Trends in Plant Science, 20, 273-282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 杨丽平, 徐赛, 张锦韬, 等. 不同功能微生物菌剂对马龙烟区植烟土壤化学性质及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2022, 34(10): 64-70.
[16] 陈大江, 杨青云, 朱宏强, 等. 不同肥料运筹模式对烤烟生长及产质量的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2024, 52(5): 107-113.
[17] 国家烟草专卖局. YC/T 142-2010《烟草农艺性状调查测量方法》[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010.
[18] 国家烟草专卖局. YC/T 31-1996《烟草及烟草制品试样的制备和水分的测定-烘箱法》[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1996.
[19] 蒋伟峰, 金佳威, 常剑波, 等. 根施γ-聚谷氨酸对烤烟根系活力及烟叶产量和品质的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 51(7): 56-64.
[20] 陈明俊, 罗小波, 曹贞菊, 等. 基于主成分分析和隶属函数法对不同马铃薯酶促褐变评价[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2024(4): 85-92.
[21] 张欢欢. 长汀县植烟土壤养分状况及不同培肥措施效应的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2014.
[22] 杨春婷, 张永清, 董璐, 等. 不同基因型苦荞幼苗对低磷胁迫的响应[J]. 植物科学学报, 2018, 36(6): 859-867.
[23] 熊格生. 营养液漂浮育苗移栽棉高产与高效栽培的生物学特性分析[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2009.
[24] Mittler, R. (2017) ROS Are Good. Trends in Plant Science, 22, 11-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Van Breusegem, F. and Dat, J.F. (2006) Reactive Oxygen Species in Plant Cell Death. Plant Physiology, 141, 384-390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] 陈观秀, 周鸿凯, 王盼盼, 等. 幼苗期不同水稻材料应答盐胁迫的生理差异分析[J]. 广西植物, 2023, 43(12): 2328-2337.
[27] 易家宁. 干旱及盐胁迫对紫苏光合特性、生理及品质的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2019.
[28] Szabados, L. and Savouré, A. (2010) Proline: A Multifunctional Amino Acid. Trends in Plant Science, 15, 89-97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]