知觉控制理论视角下的高等教育教学重构
Restructuring Higher Education Teaching from the Perspective of Perceptual Control Theory
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.167340, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 蒙 杰:广西师范大学教育学部,广西 桂林
关键词: 知觉控制理论教学重构层次对话法形成性评价Perceptual Control Theory Teaching Reconstruction Method of Levels Formative Assessment
摘要: 传统高等教育的“输入–输出”教学过于重视学习者的输出而忽略了主体性,不能有效促进深度学习的发生。本文借鉴知觉控制理论(Perceptual Control Theory, PCT),把学生构想成一种可以自主调节的负反馈控制系统,提出了“教育即重组引导”观点。以普通心理学课程为例,研究了PCT框架下的教学重构:在目标设定中,把外部的大纲目标转变成学生自己内在的感知参照值;在情境创设中,设计适当的扰动引起重组;在交互引导中,运用层次对话法(Method of Levels, MOL)促进学生的元认知觉察。本文还提出控制过程评价体系,建构出感知敏感度、控制稳定性和重组有效性三个基本指标。PCT是对“以学生为中心”教学改革的可行指引,对当前高校的教评改革具有启示意义。
Abstract: Traditional higher education “input-output” teaching places excessive emphasis on learners’ output while neglecting subjectivity, failing to effectively promote deep learning. This paper draws on the perceptual control theory (PCT), conceptualizing students as a self-regulated negative feedback control system, and proposes the view that “education is restructuring guidance.” Taking the General Psychology course as an example, it studies teaching restructuring under the PCT framework: In goal setting, the external syllabus objectives are transformed into students’ own internal perceptual reference values; In scenario creation, design appropriate disturbances to trigger reorganization; In interactive guidance, the Method of Levels (MOL) is used to promote students’ metacognitive awareness. This paper also proposes a control process evaluation system, constructing three basic indicators: perceptual sensitivity, control stability, and recombination effectiveness. The PCT serves as a feasible guide for “student-centered” teaching reform and offers insights for current university teaching evaluation reforms.
文章引用:蒙杰 (2026). 知觉控制理论视角下的高等教育教学重构. 心理学进展, 16(7), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.167340

参考文献

[1] 程子轩, 黄喜生, 乔亚茹(2025). 国内高校课程形成性评价研究现状及趋势探讨. 现代教育科学, (2), 149-156.
[2] 牛连强, 冯海文(2017). 关于高校课程教学开展形成性评价的思考——基于工程教育专业认证背景. 大学教育, (9), 192-195.
[3] 钱明霞, 赵磊磊(2023). 大数据赋能本科教学质量评价: 价值意蕴、现实困境与路径选择. 重庆高教研究, 11(5), 40-48.
[4] 解德渤(2018). 大学创新教学的实践误区及反思. 中国大学教学, (8), 70-74.
[5] 赵炬明, 高筱卉(2017). 关于实施“以学生为中心”的本科教学改革的思考. 中国高教研究, (8), 36-40.
[6] Carey, T. A., Mansell, W., & Tai, S. J. (2015). Principles-Based Counselling and Psychotherapy: A Method of Levels Approach (p. 178). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.[CrossRef
[7] Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., Ruscio, J., & Beyerstein, B. L. (2011). 50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology: Shattering Widespread Misconceptions about Human Behavior. John Wiley & Sons.
[8] Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction: An Example of the Interaction between Language and Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585-589.[CrossRef
[9] McClelland, K., & Mansell, W. (2019). Resolving Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Conflicts: A Comparison of the Practice of Mediation with Method-of-Levels Psychotherapy. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences, 9, 1-38.
[10] Morphew, J. W. (2021). Changes in Metacognitive Monitoring Accuracy in an Introductory Physics Course. Metacognition and Learning, 16, 89-111.[CrossRef
[11] Panadero, E. (2017). A Review of Self-Regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article ID: 422.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The Control of Perception. Aldine.
[13] Powers, W. T. (2005). Behavior: The Control of Perception (2nd ed.). Benchmark Press.
[14] Powers, W. T. (2008). Living Control Systems III: The Fact of Control. Benchmark Publications.
[15] Tobin, K. (1987). The Role of Wait Time in Higher Cognitive Level Learning. Review of Educational Research, 57, 69-95.[CrossRef
[16] Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41, 64-70.[CrossRef