黑格尔论艺术哲学的正当性——基于《逻辑学》的视角
Hegel on the Legitimacy of the Philosophy of Art—A Perspective from the Science of Logic
摘要: 自从谢林正式确立“艺术哲学”的概念,艺术哲学的正当性问题始终是艺术哲学的关键问题。在1823年,黑格尔也提出了艺术哲学的正当性问题,即“艺术是否配得上哲学的考察”。黑格尔如何解决这一问题,我们又该如何理解黑格尔的论证?本文通过对《美学讲演录(1823)》和《逻辑学》的交叉分析,考察黑格尔证明艺术哲学正当性的原始思路。首先,黑格尔的证明思路是围绕“映象(Schein)”证明艺术哲学的正当性。其次,黑格尔对“映象”的使用,需通过《逻辑学》对“映象”的论述才能充分理解。最后,从《逻辑学》视角指出以“映象”为核心的证明思路的内在张力,提供了黑格尔思路演变的一种可能解释。本文揭示了黑格尔哲学各文本的内在联系以及《逻辑学》的中介作用,指出了进一步研究黑格尔艺术哲学思想的变化与发展的路径与切入点,奠定了进一步研究的基础。
Abstract: Since Schelling formally established the concept of the “philosophy of art,” the question of its legitimacy has remained a central issue. In 1823, Hegel also raised the question of the legitimacy of the philosophy of art, namely: “Is art worthy of philosophical examination?” How does Hegel address this question, and how are we to understand his argument? Through a cross-analysis of the Lectures on the Philosophy of Art (1823) and the Science of Logic, this paper examines Hegel’s original line of reasoning for justifying the philosophy of art. First, Hegel’s argument centers on the concept of Shine (Schein) to establish the legitimacy of the philosophy of art. Second, a full understanding of Hegel’s use of Shine requires recourse to its treatment in the Science of Logic. Finally, from the perspective of the Science of Logic, this paper points out certain internal tension in Hegel’s justification based on Shine, thereby offering a possible explanation for the evolution of Hegel’s thinking. This study reveals the internal connections among different texts in Hegel’s corpus and the mediating role played by the Science of Logic, indicating a path for further research into the changes and developments in Hegel’s philosophy of art.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
先刚. “建构”与“反思”——谢林和黑格尔艺术哲学的差异[J]. 文艺研究, 2020(6): 5-13.
|
|
[2]
|
Hegel, G.W.F. (2015) Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Kunst: Nachschriften zu den Kollegien der Jahre 1820/21 und 1823. Felix Meiner Verlag.
|
|
[3]
|
Hegel, G.W.F. (2014) Lectures on the Philosophy of Art: The Hotho Transcript of the 1823 Berlin Lectures. Oxford University Press.
|
|
[4]
|
徐贤樑. 论黑格尔美学体系的形成——《美学讲演录(1820/1821)》的文献意义与体系价值[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 45(5): 149-160+200.
|
|
[5]
|
(德)黑格尔, 著. 美学讲演录I[M]//先刚, 译. 黑格尔著作集: 第13卷. 北京: 人民出版社, 2025: 5.
|
|
[6]
|
Gethmann-Siefert, A. (1995) Einführung in die Ästhetik. Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
|
|
[7]
|
Jaeschke, W. (2020) Hegels Philosophie. Felix Meiner Verlag. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
(英)霍尔盖特, 著. 黑格尔导论: 自由、真理与历史[M]. 丁三东, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2013: 11.
|
|
[9]
|
(德)黑格尔, 著. 逻辑学Ⅱ[M]//先刚, 译. 黑格尔著作集: 第6卷. 北京: 人民出版社, 2021: 9.
|
|
[10]
|
Schmidt, K.J. (1997) Georg W. F. Hegel, Wissenschaft der Logik—Die Lehre vom Wesen: Ein einführender Kommentar. Ferdinand Schöningh.
|
|
[11]
|
Quante, M. and Mooren, N. (2018) Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Felix Meiner. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[12]
|
Henrich, D. (2016) Die Wissenschaft der Logik und die Logik der Reflexion. Felix Meiner.
|
|
[13]
|
Guzzoni, U., Rang, B. and Siep, L. (1976) Der Idealismus und seine Gegenwart: Festschrift für Werner Marx zum 65. Felix Meiner.
|
|
[14]
|
Hegel, G.W.F. (2020) Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Kunst: Nachschriften zum Kolleg des Wintersemesters 1828/29. Felix Meiner Verlag.
|