|
[1]
|
Simon, H.A. (1957) A behavioral model of rational choice. In: Models of Man, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 241- 260.
|
|
[2]
|
Ellsberg, D. (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643-669.
|
|
[3]
|
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
|
|
[4]
|
Kennedy, J., Mitchell, T. and Sefcik, S.E. (1998) Disclosure of contingent environmental liabilities: Some unintended consequences? Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 257277.
|
|
[5]
|
Beaver, W.H. (1991) Problems and paradoxes in the financial reporting of future events. Accounting Horizons, 5, 122- 134.
|
|
[6]
|
Harrison, K.E. and Tomassini, L.A. (1989) Judging the probability of a contingent loss: An empirical study. Contemporary Accounting Research, 5, 642-648.
|
|
[7]
|
Amer, T.S., Hackenbrack, K. and Nelson, M.W. (1994) Between-auditor differences in the interpretation of probability phrases. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 13, 126-136.
|
|
[8]
|
Sawers, K., Wright, A. and Zamora, V. (2011) Does greater risk-bearing in stock option compensation reduce the influence of problem framing on managerial risk-taking behavior? Behavioral Research in Accounting, 23, 185-201.
|
|
[9]
|
Levin, I.P. and Gaeth, G.J. (1988) How consumer are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 269-278.
|
|
[10]
|
O’Clock, P. and Devine, K. (1995) An investigation of framing and firm size on the auditor’s going concern decision. Accounting and Business Research, 25, 197-207.
|
|
[11]
|
Fox, C.R. and Tversky, A. (1995) Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 585-603.
|
|
[12]
|
Frisch, D. and Baron, J. (1994) Ambiguous probabilities and the paradoxes of expected utility. In: Wright, G. and Ayton, P., Eds., Subjective Probability, Wiley, Chichester, 273-294.
|
|
[13]
|
Nelson, M.W. and Kinney Jr., W.R. (1997) The effect of ambiguity on loss contingency reporting judgments. Accounting Review, 72, 257-274.
|