隐匿性胆总管结石的诊断评估与风险分层管理进展
Progress in Diagnostic Evaluation and Risk-Stratified Management of Occult Common Bile Duct Stones
摘要: 隐匿性胆总管结石多见于胆囊结石术前评估、胆总管轻度扩张、影像学偶然发现及胆囊切除术中胆道影像检查等场景,常因症状缺如或不典型而被低估。其处理难点在于:未及时处理可能导致急性胆管炎、梗阻性黄疸、胆源性胰腺炎或术后残留结石;过度干预又可能使低负荷、小结石或已自发排石患者承担不必要ERCP及术后胰腺炎风险。本文结合近年研究及国内外指南,从概念界定、自然史、诊断评估、围手术期识别、治疗选择、特殊人群及我国不同级别医疗机构实施策略等方面进行综述,强调以症状、胆管扩张、结石负荷、感染程度、胰腺炎状态、手术时机、ERCP风险和医疗资源可及性为基础进行风险分层。对合并胆管炎、持续梗阻或明确高危结石者应积极引流和取石;对小结石、单发、胆管不扩张且无症状者,应重视ERCP前复核和动态观察;对胆囊切除围手术期发现者,则应结合术中条件、术者经验和患者风险选择术中处理、同期或延期ERCP及随访。
Abstract: Occult common bile duct stones are frequently encountered in clinical scenarios such as preoperative assessment for cholecystolithiasis, mild dilatation of the common bile duct, incidental findings on imaging, and intraoperative biliary imaging during cholecystectomy. Because symptoms are often absent or atypical, these stones are easily underestimated. The major challenge in management lies in balancing the risks of undertreatment and overtreatment: failure to recognize and manage them promptly may result in acute cholangitis, obstructive jaundice, biliary pancreatitis, or retained postoperative stones, whereas unnecessary intervention may expose patients with low stone burden, small stones, or spontaneous stone passage to avoidable ERCP-related complications, particularly post-ERCP pancreatitis. Based on recent studies and current domestic and international guidelines, this review summarizes the definition, natural history, diagnostic evaluation, perioperative identification, treatment options, special populations, and implementation strategies across different levels of medical institutions in China. It emphasizes a risk-stratified approach based on symptoms, bile duct dilatation, stone burden, severity of infection, pancreatitis status, timing of surgery, ERCP-related risk, and healthcare resource availability. Active biliary drainage and stone extraction are recommended for patients with cholangitis, persistent obstruction, or clearly high-risk stones. In contrast, for asymptomatic patients with small, solitary stones, no bile duct dilatation, and low stone burden, confirmation before ERCP and dynamic observation should be emphasized. For stones detected during the perioperative period of cholecystectomy, management should be individualized according to intraoperative conditions, surgeon expertise, patient risk, and the feasibility of intraoperative treatment, simultaneous or delayed ERCP, and follow-up.
文章引用:田风云, 郭相高财郎, 李帅, 刘佳荣, 王媛媛, 程军胜. 隐匿性胆总管结石的诊断评估与风险分层管理进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(7): 836-845. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1672592

参考文献

[1] 中华医学会消化内镜学分会ERCP学组, 中国医师协会消化医师分会胆胰学组, 国家消化系统疾病临床医学研究中心. 中国ERCP指南(2018版) [J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2018, 35(11): 777-813.
[2] 中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组. 急性胆道系统感染的诊断和治疗指南(2021版) [J]. 中华外科杂志, 2021, 59(6): 422-429.
[3] 中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会胆道外科医师委员会. 胆囊良性疾病外科治疗的专家共识(2021版) [J]. 中华外科杂志, 2022, 60(1): 4-9.
[4] Buxbaum, J.L., Abbas Fehmi, S.M., Sultan, S., Fishman, D.S., Qumseya, B.J., Cortessis, V.K., et al. (2019) ASGE Guideline on the Role of Endoscopy in the Evaluation and Management of Choledocholithiasis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 89, 1075-1105.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Manes, G., Paspatis, G., Aabakken, L., Anderloni, A., Arvanitakis, M., Ah-Soune, P., et al. (2019) Endoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy, 51, 472-491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Williams, E., Beckingham, I., El Sayed, G., Gurusamy, K., Sturgess, R., Webster, G., et al. (2017) Updated Guideline on the Management of Common Bile Duct Stones (CBDS). Gut, 66, 765-782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Caddy, G.R., Kirby, J., Kirk, S.J., et al. (2005) Natural History of Asymptomatic Bile Duct Stones at Time of Cholecystectomy. Ulster Medical Journal, 74, 108-112.
[8] Collins, C., Maguire, D., Ireland, A., Fitzgerald, E. and O’Sullivan, G.C. (2004) A Prospective Study of Common Bile Duct Calculi in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Natural History of Choledocholithiasis Revisited. Annals of Surgery, 239, 28-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Hakuta, R., Hamada, T., Nakai, Y., Oyama, H., Kanai, S., Suzuki, T., et al. (2020) Natural History of Asymptomatic Bile Duct Stones and Association of Endoscopic Treatment with Clinical Outcomes. Journal of Gastroenterology, 55, 78-85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Saito, H., Iwasaki, H., Itoshima, H., Kadono, Y., Shono, T., Kamikawa, K., et al. (2023) Unnecessary Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Associated with the Spontaneous Passage of Common Bile Duct Stones into the Duodenum: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Surgical Endoscopy, 37, 4585-4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Johansson, E., Österberg, J., Sverdén, E., Enochsson, L. and Sandblom, G. (2021) Intervention versus Surveillance in Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones Detected by Intraoperative Cholangiography: A Population-Based Registry Study. British Journal of Surgery, 108, 1506-1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Chhoda, A., Dawod, S., Grimshaw, A., Gunderson, C. and Mahadev, S. (2021) Evaluation of Diagnostic Yield of EUS among Patients with Asymptomatic Common Bile Duct Dilation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 94, 890-901.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Raza, Z., Altayar, O., Mahmoud, T., Abusaleh, R., Ghazi, R., Early, D., et al. (2024) Clinical Predictors of Significant Findings on EUS for the Evaluation of Incidental Common Bile Duct Dilation. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 100, 670-678.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Afzalpurkar, S., Giri, S., Kasturi, S., Ingawale, S. and Sundaram, S. (2023) Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography versus Endoscopic Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surgical Endoscopy, 37, 2566-2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Varone, A., Mendoza, A., Gelbard, R., Tracy, B. and Poulose, B. (2025) Suspected Common Bile Duct Stones: Which Test Is Best? Surgical Endoscopy, 39, 6525-6529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Chiriac, S., Sfarti, C., Minea, H., Zenovia, S., Girleanu, I., Huiban, L., et al. (2026) Endoscopic Ultrasound and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Bile Duct Stones—Avoiding the Avoidable. Biomedicines, 14, Article 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Hong, J., Kumar, S., Akram, I., Khan, S.R., Cetrulo, L.N., Ignacio, R., et al. (2025) Intraoperative Imaging of the Common Bile Duct: A Systematic Review. Surgical Endoscopy, 39, 4716-4751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Brunt, L.M., Deziel, D.J., Telem, D.A., et al. (2025) SAGES Guidelines for the Use of Intraoperative Imaging of the Common Bile Duct. Surgical Endoscopy, 39, 4959-4981.
[19] Kim, S.B., Kim, K.H. and Kim, T.N. (2016) Comparison of Outcomes and Complications of Endoscopic Common Bile Duct Stone Removal between Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Patients. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 61, 1172-1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Saito, H., Kakuma, T., Kadono, Y., Urata, A., Kamikawa, K., Imamura, H., et al. (2017) Increased Risk and Severity of ERCP-Related Complications Associated with Asymptomatic Common Bile Duct Stones. Endoscopy International Open, 5, E809-E817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Saito, H., Kadono, Y., Shono, T., Kamikawa, K., Urata, A., Nasu, J., et al. (2021) Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography‐Related Complications for Bile Duct Stones in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Patients. JGH Open, 5, 1382-1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Kadokura, M., Takenaka, Y., Yoda, H., et al. (2021) Asymptomatic Common Bile Duct Stones Are Associated with Increased Risk of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. JMA Journal, 4, 141-147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Kataoka, F., Okuno, M., Mukai, T., Tagami, A., Araki, H., Sugihara, J., et al. (2025) Higher Risk of Post‐Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis in Patients with Asymptomatic Common Bile Duct Stones Compared to Symptomatic Cases: A Propensity Score‐Matched Cohort Analysis. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, 32, 713-720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Watanabe, M., Okuwaki, K., Iwai, T., Kida, M., Imaizumi, H., Adachi, K., et al. (2023) Balloon Enteroscopy‐Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Asymptomatic Common Bile Duct Stones on Surgically Altered Anatomy: A High Risk Factor for Post‐endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, 31, 25-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Shimojo, K., Maruta, A., Iwata, K., Iwasa, Y., Okuno, M., Yoshida, K., et al. (2025) Comparative Outcomes of Endoscopic Treatment for Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Common Bile Duct Stones in the Elderly: A Propensity Score‐based Cohort Analysis. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, 33, 304-311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Dumonceau, J., Kapral, C., Aabakken, L., Papanikolaou, I.S., Tringali, A., Vanbiervliet, G., et al. (2020) ERCP-Related Adverse Events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy, 52, 127-149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]