混合学习中认知负荷调控的理论整合与研究进展——基于资源与活动协同视角的文献综述
Theoretical Integration and Research Progress of Cognitive Load Regulation in Blended Learning—A Literature Review from the Perspective of Resource-Activity Synergy
摘要: 人工智能与大数据赋能的混合学习常因资源过载与活动无序引发学习者认知负荷失衡。本文基于认知负荷理论,系统梳理了混合学习中资源与活动的负荷特征及调控路径。研究发现:资源呈现冗余与组织不当易引发外在负荷超载;高阶任务与协作活动缺乏支架则导致内在负荷过高;二者共同抑制相关负荷生成,阻碍深度加工。据此,本文提出阶段性负荷分配视角,主张超越单一维度的局部优化,构建“信息呈现–任务复杂度–支架水平”三维协同调控机制,为混合式教学设计提供系统化理论依据。
Abstract: Blended learning empowered by artificial intelligence and big data often leads to cognitive load imbalance among learners due to information overload and disorganized learning activities. Grounded in cognitive load theory, this paper systematically reviews the load characteristics and regulation mechanisms of resources and activities in blended learning. The findings indicate that redundant presentation and poor organization of resources easily cause excessive extraneous cognitive load, while high-order tasks and collaborative activities without adequate scaffolding result in high intrinsic cognitive load. Together, they inhibit the generation of germane cognitive load and hinder deep learning. Accordingly, this paper proposes a phased load distribution perspective, advocating moving beyond isolated optimization of single dimensions and constructing a three-dimensional synergistic regulation mechanism covering information presentation, task complexity, and scaffolding level, so as to provide a systematic theoretical basis for blended learning design.
文章引用:李欣. 混合学习中认知负荷调控的理论整合与研究进展——基于资源与活动协同视角的文献综述[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(7): 359-367. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1671377

参考文献

[1] 兰国帅, 郭倩, 魏家财, 等. 5G+智能技术: 构筑“智能+”时代的智能教育新生态系统[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2019, 37(3): 3-16.
[2] 陈明选, 来智玲. 智能时代教学范式的转型与重构[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2020, 32(4): 19-26.
[3] Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J.J.G. and Paas, F. (2019) Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261-292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Sweller, J. (2011) Cognitive Load Theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 37-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 温慧群, 穆肃. 殊途如何同归?——不同复杂度混合教学实践效果的分析[J]. 中国远程教育, 2023, 43(2): 64-72.
[6] 易祯, 吴美玉. 从“混合”到“融合”: 线上线下融合式教学设计研究[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2023, 29(11): 84-96.
[7] Müller, F.A. and Wulf, T. (2024) Differences in Learning Effectiveness across Management Learning Environments: A Cognitive Load Theory Perspective. Journal of Management Education, 48, 802-828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Kalyuga, S. (2011) Cognitive Load Theory: How Many Types of Load Does It Really Need? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 1-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Fiorella, L. and Mayer, R.E. (2021) Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing in Multimedia Learning: Coherence, Signaling, Redundancy, Spatial Contiguity, and Temporal Contiguity Principles. In: Mayer, R.E., Ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Cambridge University Press, 185-198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Liu, T., Lin, Y. and Kalyuga, S. (2021) Effects of Complexity-Determined System Pausing on Learning from Multimedia Presentations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 102-114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Khacharem, A., Zoudji, B. and Kalyuga, S. (2015) Expertise Reversal for Different Forms of Instructional Designs in Dynamic Visual Representations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 756-767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Chen, C.M. and Wu, C.H. (2015) Effects of Different Video Lecture Types on Sustained Attention, Emotion, Cognitive Load, and Learning Performance. Computers & Education, 80, 108-121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Wirzberger, M., Herms, R., Esmaeili Bijarsari, S., Eibl, M. and Rey, G.D. (2018) Schema-Related Cognitive Load Influences Performance, Speech, and Physiology in a Dual-Task Setting: A Continuous Multi-Measure Approach. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3, Article No. 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] van Alten, D.C.D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J. and Kester, L. (2019) Effects of Flipping the Classroom on Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, Article 100281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Fischer, K., Sullivan, A.M., Cohen, A.P., King, R.W., Cockrill, B.A. and Besche, H.C. (2023) Using Cognitive Load Theory to Evaluate and Improve Preparatory Materials and Study Time for the Flipped Classroom. BMC Medical Education, 23, Article No. 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Guo, P.J., Kim, J. and Rubin, R. (2014) How Video Production Affects Student Engagement. Proceedings of the First ACM conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, Atlanta, 4-5 March 2014, 41-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 王燕青, 杨晓梦, 赵婷婷, 等. 分段是视频学习的有效方式吗? [J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 600-608.
[18] 王雪, 周围, 王志军. 教学视频中交互控制促进有意义学习的实验研究[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2018, 36(1): 97-105.
[19] 高媛, 黄真真, 李冀红, 等. 智慧学习环境中的认知负荷问题[J]. 开放教育研究, 2017, 23(1): 56-64.
[20] Lo, C.K. and Hew, K.F. (2017) A Critical Review of Flipped Classroom Challenges in K-12 Education: Possible Solutions and Recommendations for Future Research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12, Article No. 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Chen, O., Kalyuga, S. and Sweller, J. (2017) The Expertise Reversal Effect Is a Variant of the More General Element Interactivity Effect. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 393-405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Kastaun, M., Meier, M., Küchemann, S. and Kuhn, J. (2021) Validation of Cognitive Load during Inquiry-Based Learning with Multimedia Scaffolds Using Subjective Measurement and Eye Movements. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article ID: 703857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Blikstein, P., Gomes, J.S., Akiba, H.T. and Schneider, B. (2017) The Effect of Highly Scaffolded versus General Instruction on Students’ Exploratory Behavior and Arousal. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22, 105-128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J. and Clark, R.E. (2006) Why Minimal Guidance during Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Khudhur, N., Pinandito, A., Hayashi, Y. and Hirashima, T. (2024) Investigating the Efficacy of Partial Decomposition in Kit-Build Concept Maps for Reducing Cognitive Load and Enhancing Reading Comprehension. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 107, 714-727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Costley, J., Gorbunova, A., Courtney, M., Chen, O. and Lange, C. (2024) Problem-Solving Support and Instructional Sequence: Impact on Cognitive Load and Student Performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39, 1817-1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Sankaranarayanan, R., Kwon, K. and Cho, Y. (2021) Exploring the Differences between Individuals and Groups during the Problem-Solving Process: The Collective Working-Memory Effect and the Role of Collaborative Interactions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 32, 43-66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Kirschner, F., Paas, F. and Kirschner, P.A. (2010) Task Complexity as a Driver for Collaborative Learning Efficiency: The Collective Working-Memory Effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 615-624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F. and Zambrano R., J. (2018) From Cognitive Load Theory to Collaborative Cognitive Load Theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13, 213-233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Sawyer, R.K. (2005) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
[31] Antonenko, P.D. and Niederhauser, D.S. (2010) The Influence of Leads on Cognitive Load and Learning in a Hypertext Environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 140-150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Munshi, A., Biswas, G., Baker, R., Ocumpaugh, J., Hutt, S. and Paquette, L. (2023) Analysing Adaptive Scaffolds That Help Students Develop Self‐Regulated Learning Behaviours. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39, 351-368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Tugtekin, U. and Odabasi, H.F. (2023) Effect of Multitasking and Task Characteristics Interaction on Cognitive Load and Learning Outcomes in Virtual Reality Learning Environments. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 14915-14942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Poupard, M., Larrue, F., Sauzéon, H. and Tricot, A. (2025) A Systematic Review of Immersive Technologies for Education: Learning Performance, Cognitive Load and Intrinsic Motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56, 5-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Hung, C.T., Wu, S.E., Chen, Y.H., Soong, C., Chiang, C. and Wang, W. (2024) The Evaluation of Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Learning: Student Experience, Learning Outcomes, and Cognitive Load. BMC Medical Education, 24, Article No. 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Lee, H. and Wu, T. (2025) Enhancing Blended Learning Discussions with a Scaffolded Knowledge Integration-Based ChatGPT Mobile Instant Messaging System. Computers & Education, 237, Article 105375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] 刘娟, 胡雪莲, 王军豪, 等. 数字化学习中认知负荷智能化评估研究进展[J]. 武汉大学学报(理学版), 2025, 71(4): 427-441.
[38] 薛耀锋, 王坤, 邱奕盛, 等. 基于多模态数据的在线学习认知负荷评估[J]. 现代教育技术, 2024, 34(3): 79-88.