基于CMIP6模式模拟的不同排放情景下的2015~2100年北极通航风险评估
Risk Assessment of Arctic Navigability under Different Emission Scenarios Simulated by CMIP6 Models from 2015 to 2100
DOI: 10.12677/ccrl.2026.154077, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 高千惠, 吴昊煜, 赵传湖*, 黄 菲:中国海洋大学透明北极山东省重点实验室,山东 青岛;中国海洋大学海洋与大气学院,山东 青岛;胡舒涵:航天天目(重庆)卫星科技有限公司,北京;刘彬贤:天津海洋中心气象台,天津
关键词: 北极航道CMIP6通航风险综合风险指数近地面风速海冰Arctic Shipping Routes CMIP6 Navigation Risk Comprehensive Risk Index Near-Surface Wind Speed Sea Ice
摘要: 在全球变暖背景下,北极海冰持续消退为北极航道通航提供了有利条件,但近地面风场变化也增加了通航不确定性。本文基于CMIP6中对北极气候模拟性能较优的多模式集合平均结果,构建综合考虑海冰厚度、海冰密集度与近地面10 m风速的海冰–风综合风险指数(CRI),定量评估了SSP1-2.6、SSP2-4.5、SSP3-7.0和SSP5-8.5等四种情景下2015~2100年普通商船在东北航道、中央航道和西北航道的通航风险。结果表明:(1) 21世纪北极通航风险整体呈下降趋势,但空间差异显著。高风险区主要位于格陵兰岛以北海域和加拿大北极群岛附近,至21世纪末该区域CRI仍普遍高于0.4,表明该区域在评估标准下仍不具备通航条件;低风险区由欧亚边缘海向极区扩展,在SSP5-8.5情景下超过60%海域可满足通航要求(CRI < 0.2)。(2) 未来北极通航条件存在显著季节差异,夏季最优、冬季最差。在中高排放情景下,夏季东北和西北航道普遍具备通航条件(CRI < 0.2),而冬季大部分区域CRI仍高于0.4,无法通航,表明季节性海冰覆盖仍是限制冬春季通航的主导因素。(3) 在SSP2-4.5情景下,西北航道夏季CRI下降40%~50%,中央航道全年CRI下降25%~30%;但在SSP5-8.5情景下,夏季东北航道CRI后期出现小幅回升,表明在海冰持续减少的背景下,近地面10 m风速增强可能反而会增加通航风险。
Abstract: Under the background of global warming, the continued retreat of Arctic sea ice provides favorable conditions for the navigability of Arctic shipping routes; however, changes in the near-surface wind field also introduce uncertainties to navigation. This study employs the multi-model ensemble mean of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) models that demonstrate superior performance in simulating Arctic climate conditions. A comprehensive Sea Ice-Wind Composite Risk Index (CRI) is developed, integrating sea ice thickness, sea ice concentration, and near-surface (10 m) wind speed, to quantitatively assess the navigational risks for ordinary merchant vessels along the Northeast Passage, the Central Arctic Passage, and the Northwest Passage from 2015 to 2100 under four scenarios: SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5. The results indicate: (1) In the 21st century, the overall navigational risk in the Arctic exhibits a declining trend, but with significant spatial heterogeneity. High-risk areas are primarily located in the seas north of Greenland and near the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, where the CRI remains generally above 0.4 by the end of the century, suggesting that these regions are still not navigable under the evaluation criteria. In contrast, low-risk areas expand from the Eurasian marginal seas toward the polar region, and under the SSP5-8.5 scenario, more than 60% of the Arctic waters meet the navigability requirement (CRI < 0.2). (2) Future Arctic navigability shows pronounced seasonal differences, being most favorable in summer and least in winter. Under medium-to-high emission scenarios, the Northeast and Northwest Passages are generally navigable in summer (CRI < 0.2), while in winter, most areas exhibit a CRI exceeding 0.4, rendering navigation infeasible. This indicates that seasonal sea ice cover remains the dominant factor restricting navigation in winter and spring. (3) Under the SSP2-4.5 scenario, summer CRI in the Northwest Passage decreases by 40%~50%, while the annual CRI along the Central Arctic Passage declines by 25%~30%. However, under the SSP5-8.5 scenario, a slight increase in summer CRI is observed in the later period along the Northeast Passage, suggesting that intensified near-surface (10 m) wind speeds may increase navigational risk despite ongoing sea ice reduction.
文章引用:高千惠, 吴昊煜, 胡舒涵, 赵传湖, 黄菲, 刘彬贤. 基于CMIP6模式模拟的不同排放情景下的2015~2100年北极通航风险评估[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2026, 15(4): 726-743. https://doi.org/10.12677/ccrl.2026.154077

参考文献

[1] Barnhart, K.R., Miller, C.R., Overeem, I. and Kay, J.E. (2016) Mapping the Future Expansion of Arctic Open Water. Nature Climate Change, 6, 280-285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Stephenson, S.R., Smith, L.C., Brigham, L.W. and Agnew, J.A. (2013) Projected 21st-Century Changes to Arctic Marine Access. Climatic Change, 118, 885-899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Notz, D. and Stroeve, J. (2016) Observed Arctic Sea-Ice Loss Directly Follows Anthropogenic CO2 Emission. Science, 354, 747-750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press.
[5] 胡舒涵, 丁瑞昌, 吴昊煜, 等. CMIP6模拟北极海冰面积变化能力评估[J]. 极地研究, 2025, 37(2): 212-224.
[6] Zhao, C., Wang, Y., Gong, Y., Brown, S. and Li, R. (2021) The Evolution of the Port Network along the Maritime Silk Road: From a Sustainable Development Perspective. Marine Policy, 126, Article 104426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Dale, B. and Kristoffersen, B. (2018) Post-Petroleum Security in a Changing Arctic: Narratives and Trajectories towards Viable Futures. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 9, 244-261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Cariou, P., Cheaitou, A., Faury, O. and Hamdan, S. (2021) The Feasibility of Arctic Container Shipping: The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Ice Thickness. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 23, 615-631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Stoddard, M.A., Etienne, L., Fournier, M., Pelot, R. and Beveridge, L. (2016) Making Sense of Arctic Maritime Traffic Using the Polar Operational Limits Assessment Risk Indexing System (Polaris). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 34, Article 012034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 曹云峰, 张岩, 丁琪, 等. 北极跨极航道通航能力变化研究综述[J]. 科学通报, 2021, 66(1): 21-33.
[11] 李宁, 王烨, 张正涛. 从科技论文数量和内容看自然灾害风险度评估方法的转变[J]. 灾害学, 2016, 31(3): 8-14.
[12] 王哲, 葛珊珊, 张韧, 等. 基于粗糙集与犹豫层次分析的北极东北航道风险评估[J]. 海洋通报, 2017, 36(5): 512-520.
[13] 周天军, 邹立维, 陈晓龙. 第六次国际耦合模式比较计划(CMIP6)评述[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2019, 15(5): 445-456.
[14] Smith, L.C. and Stephenson, S.R. (2013) New Trans-Arctic Shipping Routes Navigable by Midcentury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, E1191-E1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Melia, N., Haines, K. and Hawkins, E. (2016) Sea Ice Decline and 21st Century Trans-Arctic Shipping Routes. Geophysical Research Letters, 43, 9720-9728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Li, M., Hu, S., Gao, Q., Ding, R., Zhao, C. and Huang, F. (2025) Navigability of Arctic Sea Routes in the 21st Century Based on CMIP6. Advances in Polar Science, 36, 246-264.
[17] Chen, W., Jiang, Z. and Li, L. (2011) Probabilistic Projections of Climate Change over China under the SRES A1B Scenario Using 28 AOGCMs. Journal of Climate, 24, 4741-4756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 吴昊煜, 胡舒涵, 杜如意, 等. CMIP6模拟北极近地面10 m风速能力的评估[J]. 高原气象, 2025, 44(4): 833-848.
[19] Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G.A., Senior, C.A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R.J., et al. (2016) Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Experimental Design and Organization. Geoscientific Model Development, 9, 1937-1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Walsh, J.E. and Chapman, W.L. (2001) 20th-Century Sea-Ice Variations from Observational Data. Annals of Glaciology, 33, 444-448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] AMAP (2015) AMAP Assessment 2015: Methane as an Arctic Climate Forcer. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Oslo, vii+139pp.
https://www.amap.no/documents/doc/amap-assessment-2015-methane-as-an-arctic-climate-forcer/1285
[22] Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., et al. (2020) The ERA5 Global Reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146, 1999-2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., et al. (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 77, 437-471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Meier, W.N., Fetterer, F., Windnagel, A.K. and Stewart, J.S. (2021) NOAA/NSIDC Climate Data Record of Passive Microwave Sea Ice Concentration, Version 4. National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder.
[25] Zhang, J. and Rothrock, D.A. (2003) Modeling Global Sea Ice with a Thickness and Enthalpy Distribution Model in Generalized Curvilinear Coordinates. Monthly Weather Review, 131, 845-861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] 李彤彤, 汪杨骏, 吴鸿乾, 等. 北极多源海冰厚度数据产品的定量分析与综合评估[J]. 极地研究, 2024, 36(4): 607-622.
[27] 周璐, 徐世明, 曾刚. 20世纪90年代以来北极海冰减少的热动力分析——基于PIOMAS模式结果[J]. 大气科学, 2017, 41(1): 57-70.
[28] Ellis, B. and Brigham, L. (2009) Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment 2009 Report. Arctic Council, Tromsø, 194pp.
[29] Østreng, W., Eger, K.M., Fløistad, B., Jørgensen-Dahl, A., Lothe, L., Mejlænder-Larsen, M. and Wergeland, T. (2013) Shipping in Arctic Waters: A Comparison of the Northeast, Northwest and Trans Polar Passages. Springer.
[30] Jensen, Ø. (2016) The International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters: Finalization, Adoption and Law of the Sea Implications. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 7, 60-82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] IACS (2011) Requirements Concerning Polar Class. International Association of Classification Societies, London.
[32] 谢宗轩, 徐鹤, 王胜正, 等. 北极航线的海冰风险计算与航段安全评估[J]. 中国航海, 2023, 46(3): 36-41+58.
[33] International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2015) International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Polar Code). International Maritime Organization, London.
https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Documents/POLAR%20CODE%20TEXT%20AS%20ADOPTED.pdf
[34] Müller, M., Knol-Kauffman, M., Jeuring, J. and Palerme, C. (2023) Arctic Shipping Trends during Hazardous Weather and Sea-Ice Conditions and the Polar Code’s Effectiveness. npj Ocean Sustainability, 2, Article No. 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Yang, X., Lin, Z.Y., Zhang, W.J., Xu, S., Zhang, M.Y., Wu, Z.D., et al. (2024) Review of Risk Assessment for Navigational Safety and Supported Decisions in Arctic Waters. Ocean & Coastal Management, 247, Article 106931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef