“大数据杀熟”的价格歧视机理分析
An Analysis of the Mechanisms behind “Big Data Price Discrimination”
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.157759, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 毛秋红, 许为宾:贵州大学管理学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 大数据杀熟价格歧视机理探析数字平台Big Data Discriminatory Pricing Price Discrimination Mechanism Analysis Digital Platforms
摘要: 随着数字经济的高速发展,“大数据杀熟”现象日益成为社会关注的焦点。大数据技术在为消费者带来便利的同时,也引发了平台企业实施价格歧视的隐忧。为更深入地理解和有效应对大数据杀熟行为,本文首先系统梳理了大数据杀熟的定义、典型特征及常见表现形式,进而重点剖析了其背后的价格歧视机理。研究表明:1) 大数据杀熟的本质是平台依托大数据技术对消费者实施的差异化定价;2) 其在价格歧视类型上属于三级价格歧视,虽有助于提升企业利润,但亦面临实施条件的约束;3) 大数据杀熟具有广泛而深远的经济社会影响。基于上述分析,本文为治理大数据杀熟现象提出了相应的政策启示与应对建议。
Abstract: With the rapid development of the digital economy, the phenomenon of “big data-enabled price discrimination” has increasingly become a focus of social concern. While big data technology brings convenience to consumers, it also raises concerns about platform enterprises engaging in price discrimination. To gain a deeper understanding of and effectively respond to such practices, this paper first systematically reviews the definition, typical characteristics, and common manifestations of big data-enabled price discrimination, and then proceeds to analyze the underlying price discrimination mechanisms. The study reveals that: 1) big data-enabled price discrimination is essentially a form of differentiated pricing implemented by platforms using big data technology; 2) it falls under the category of third-degree price discrimination, which, although conducive to increasing corporate profits, is subject to certain implementation constraints; and 3) it has extensive and far-reaching economic and social impacts. Based on the above analysis, this paper proposes corresponding policy implications and recommendations for addressing the issue of big data-enabled price discrimination.
文章引用:毛秋红, 许为宾. “大数据杀熟”的价格歧视机理分析[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(7): 305-312. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.157759

参考文献

[1] 甄艺凯. 转移成本视角下的大数据“杀熟” [J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(5): 84-117.
[2] 赵传羽, 丁预立, 刘中全. 网络外部性与基于购买行为的价格歧视: “杀熟”的经济学分析[J]. 世界经济, 2023, 46(6): 210-236.
[3] Phlips, L. (1983) The Economics of Price Discrimination. Cambridge University Press.
[4] 李丹. 算法歧视消费者: 行为机制、损益界定与协同规制[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2021, 23(2): 17-33.
[5] 熊浩, 赵晓岚, 鄢慧丽, 等. 垄断势力视角下平台大数据杀熟的价格歧视机理[J]. 海南大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2025, 43(1): 227-235.
[6] Acquisti, A., Taylor, C. and Wagman, L. (2016) The Economics of Privacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 54, 442-492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 李三希, 武玙璠, 鲍仁杰. 大数据、个人信息保护和价格歧视——基于垂直差异化双寡头模型的分析[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(1): 43-57.
[8] 吴志艳, 罗继锋. 算法价格歧视和顾客感知背叛[J]. 上海对外经贸大学学报, 2022, 29(5): 108-124.
[9] 刘迎霜. 算法个性化定价侵权责任的规则构建[J]. 法学杂志, 2025, 46(4): 69-84.
[10] 王先林, 曹汇. 数字平台个性化定价的反垄断规制[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(4): 136-149.
[11] 韩海鹏, 李明志, 郑捷. 基于信息优势与技术优势的企业竞争策略: 一个非对称双寡头博弈模型[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(12): 77-94.
[12] Pigou, A. (2017) The Economics of Welfare. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 雷丽彩, 高尚, 陈瑞祥. 大数据“杀熟”如何破? 基于政府-消费者协同监管的演化博弈[J]. 系统管理学报, 2021, 30(4): 664-675.
[14] 陈志斌, 达瓦卓玛. 平台企业算法价格歧视行为及其协同治理[J]. 江海学刊, 2024(5): 111-119.
[15] 梁晶. 大数据时代下的算法价格歧视研究[J]. 价格月刊, 2023(3): 17-22.