柳州市地表水质量评价及生态治理研究
Study on the Quality Assessment and Ecological Governance of Surface Water in Liuzhou City
摘要: 为评价柳州市典型地表水断面的水环境质量并提出生态治理路径,本研究设置柳江上游来水、市区景观河段、工业影响控制、支流入江口和水源保护相关5类典型断面,在2024年5~9月平水期至丰水期开展监测,选取pH、DO、CODMn、COD、NH3-N、TP和TN等指标,依据GB 3838-2002采用单因子评价法和综合污染指数法分析水质类别、污染压力及主控因子,并结合底泥污染和水生态风险指标开展补充分析。结果表明,断面水质总体处于II~III类,上游来水和水源保护相关断面水质较好,支流入江口综合污染指数最高(P = 0.87),TN、TP和NH3-N为主要影响因子;工业影响控制断面COD和CODMn相对偏高,说明有机污染输入和工业排水风险仍需持续监管。底泥及水生态辅助指标显示,支流入江口和工业影响河段存在营养盐累积及生境质量下降风险。建议从源头控污、重点支流治理、排污口监管、生态缓冲带建设、水生态修复和智慧监测预警等方面推进分区治理。研究可为柳州市优良水质保持及工业城市水生态治理提供参考。
Abstract: To evaluate the water environmental quality of typical surface-water sections in Liuzhou City and to propose ecological governance strategies, five representative sections were selected, including upstream inflow, urban landscape reach, industrial impact reach, tributary confluence and water-source protection reach. Monitoring was conducted from May to September 2024, covering the normal and wet seasons. The indicators of pH, DO, CODMn, COD, NH3-N, TP and TN were analyzed using the single-factor method and comprehensive pollution index according to GB 3838-2002. Sediment pollution and aquatic ecological risk indicators were also included as supplementary evidence. The results show that the water quality of the typical sections was generally Class II-III. The upstream inflow and water-source protection sections had better conditions, while the tributary confluence section had the highest comprehensive pollution index (P = 0.87), with TN, TP and NH3-N as the dominant factors. COD and CODMn were relatively higher in the industrial impact section, indicating continued risks of organic pollution and industrial discharge. The supplementary sediment and ecological indicators suggested nutrient accumulation and habitat degradation risks in the tributary confluence and industrial impact reaches. Integrated governance measures, including source control, tributary treatment, outfall supervision, ecological buffer zones, aquatic ecological restoration and intelligent monitoring, are recommended. This study provides references for maintaining good water quality and improving ecological governance in industrial cities.
文章引用:许芮, 蒲婉莹, 杜超, 胡佳欢, 蒋奕冰, 莫奕樟, 黄彩妹, 冯兴会. 柳州市地表水质量评价及生态治理研究[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2026, 16(7): 1175-1183. https://doi.org/10.12677/aep.2026.167119

参考文献

[1] 朱伟, 夏霆, 姜谋余, 赵联芳. 城市河流水环境综合评价方法探讨[J]. 水科学进展, 2007(5): 736-744.
[2] 关于征求《河流水生态环境质量监测与评价技术指南》等3项国家环境保护标准意见的函[EB/OL].
https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk06/202009/t20200930_801824.html, 2020-09-30.
[3] 国家环境保护总局, 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. GB 3838-2002地表水环境质量标准[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
[4] 生态环境部. HJ 91.2-2022地表水环境质量监测技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2022.
[5] 国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 第4版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
[6] 生态环境部. HJ 535-2009水质 氨氮的测定 纳氏试剂分光光度法[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2009.
[7] 生态环境部. HJ 828-2017水质 化学需氧量的测定 重铬酸盐法[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2017.
[8] 环境保护部. HJ 636-2012水质 总氮的测定 碱性过硫酸钾消解紫外分光光度法[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2012.
[9] 王建龙, 陈吉宁. 城市面源污染及其控制技术研究进展[J]. 环境科学学报, 2012, 32(4): 761-772.
[10] Walsh, C.J., Roy, A.H., Feminella, J.W., Cottingham, P.D., Groffman, P.M. and Morgan, R.P. (2005) The Urban Stream Syndrome: Current Knowledge and the Search for a Cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 24, 706-723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef