论数字劳动异化
On Digital Labor Alienation
摘要: 立足历史唯物主义视角,马克思劳动观揭示了劳动与自然演进、社会发展的内在关联,并深刻批判资本主义异化劳动。数字技术全面渗透社会各领域,催生数字劳动这一新型劳动形态。相较于传统劳动,数字劳动主体多元、呈现“产消合一”特征,劳动工具智能化、劳动形式突破时空束缚,但本质仍归属于生产劳动范畴。当前学界围绕数字劳动形成受众劳动、非物质劳动、物质劳动三大研究脉络,现有研究多陷入观点对立,未能形成统一分析框架,也未能充分结合时代特征深挖异化机理与落地化解路径。本文以马克思异化劳动、劳动价值、剩余价值理论为根基,梳理数字劳动的形态变革与核心特征,对数字劳动异化四重维度展开当代解读,剖析异化生成的深层成因,并结合数字经济现实提出可落地、可实操的消解路径。
Abstract: From the perspective of historical materialism, Marx’s labor theory reveals the inherent connection between labor, natural evolution and social development, and profoundly criticizes alienated labor under capitalism. Digital technology has fully penetrated into all sectors of society, giving birth to digital labor, a new form of labor. Compared with traditional labor, digital labor is characterized by diverse subjects and the integration of production and consumption, intelligent labor tools, and labor forms breaking through the constraints of time and space, while its essence still falls into the category of productive labor. At present, the academic circle has formed three research veins of digital labor, namely audience labor, immaterial labor and material labor. Most existing studies are trapped in opposing views, failing to form a unified analytical framework, nor to fully combine the characteristics of the times to deeply explore the alienation mechanism and practical solution paths. Based on Marx’s theories of alienated labor, labor value and surplus value, this paper sorts out the morphological transformation and core characteristics of digital labor, carries out a contemporary interpretation of the four dimensions of digital labor alienation, analyzes the deep-seated causes of alienation, and proposes practical and operable resolution paths based on the reality of digital economy.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第1卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009.
|
|
[2]
|
Smythe, D.W. (1977) Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 1-27.
|
|
[3]
|
毛理齐奥∙拉扎拉托. 非物质劳动(上) [J]. 国外理论动态, 2005(3): 41.
|
|
[4]
|
麦克尔∙哈特, 安东尼奥∙奈格里. 帝国——全球化的政治秩序[M]. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2003: 286.
|
|
[5]
|
齐亚纳∙泰拉诺瓦, 杨嵘均, 曹秀娟. 免费劳动: 为数字经济生产文化[J]. 国外社会科学前沿, 2023(1): 53-69.
|
|
[6]
|
克里斯蒂安∙福克斯. 数字劳动与卡尔∙马克思[M]. 周延云, 译. 北京: 人民出版社, 2020: 32-54.
|
|
[7]
|
托夫勒. 第三次浪潮[M]. 朱志焱, 潘琪, 张炎, 译. 北京: 三联书店, 1983: 304.
|
|
[8]
|
沈蕾. 解开共享经济的密码: 产消合一逻辑[M]. 北京: 中国书籍出版社, 2019: 20.
|
|
[9]
|
马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第5卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 210.
|
|
[10]
|
尼葛洛∙庞蒂. 数字化生存[M]. 胡泳, 范海燕, 译. 海口: 海南出版社, 1996: 15.
|
|
[11]
|
黑格尔, 精神现象学[M]. 先刚, 译. 北京: 人民出版社, 2013: 303.
|
|
[12]
|
王永章. 数字劳动的马克思主义政治经济学分析[J]. 思想理论教育, 2022(02): 52-58.
|
|
[13]
|
郑元景. 虚拟生存研究[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2012: 220.
|
|
[14]
|
虞鑫, 王金鹏. 从技术到受众: 信息茧房效应的研究取向与发展进路[J]. 青年记者, 2024(4): 78-83.
|
|
[15]
|
李貌, 韩璞庚. 数字时代“信息茧房”束缚下主体性的解构与重建[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2024(3): 47-54.
|
|
[16]
|
姚忠将, 葛敬国. 关于区块链原理及应用的综述[J]. 科研信息化技术与应用, 2017, 8(2): 3-17.
|
|
[17]
|
赫伯特∙马尔库塞. 单向度的人[M]. 刘继, 译. 上海: 译文出版社, 2008: 154.
|