基于GEO数据库对子痫前期关键基因筛选及 诊断模型构建的研究
Research on Key Gene Screening and Diagnostic Model Construction for Pre-Eclampsia Based on the GEO Database
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1672623, PDF,   
作者: 李剑霞, 李 蔷*:呼和浩特市妇幼保健院(呼和浩特市妇女儿童医院),内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 子痫前期生物信息分析差异表达基因LASSO回归Preeclampsia Bioinformatics Analysis Differentially Expressed Genes LASSO Regression
摘要: 目的:旨在挖掘子痫前期(Preeclampsia, PE)患者相较正常孕妇胎盘组织中的关键差异表达基因及其临床诊断价值,并探索性构建候选诊断模型。方法:从Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)公共数据库下载GSE74341、GSE10588和GSE25906三个PE胎盘组织基因表达数据集,筛选差异基因,采用生物信息学技术进行基因本体(Gene Ontology, GO)过表征分析和基因集富集分析(Gene Set Enrichment Analysis, GSEA)分析差异基因功能。以LASSO回归构建主诊断模型,随机森林和支持向量机作为敏感性分析模型;通过嵌套五折交叉验证、独立外部验证和留一队列交叉验证评估模型性能。结果:共筛选出686个显著差异基因,其中上调347个、下调339个。GO富集分析显示差异基因主要参与氧水平响应(response to oxygen levels)、缺氧反应(response to hypoxia)、氧含量降低响应(response to decreased oxygen levels)和骨化(ossification)等生物过程,GSEA分析提示脂肪因子信号通路、细胞周期和细胞黏附分子相互作用等通路呈趋势性富集。LASSO算法构建了由YWHAB、TIMM22、TMEM45A、KARS、QPCT、SDHC、ARHGEF16、CCNH、CLN6、CNOT2、COPS5、EGFR和EPC2组成的13基因诊断面板,其中YWHAB、TIMM22和TMEM45A为交叉验证中稳定入选的基因(选择频率 ≥ 80%)。模型在发现队列内嵌套交叉验证AUC = 0.937 (95%CI 0.870~0.989),敏感性为0.875,特异性为0.944,准确率为0.912,Brier评分为0.139;模型在GSE25906独立外部队列上AUC = 0.659 (95%CI 0.510~0.803),敏感性为0.696,特异性为0.703,准确率为0.700,Brier评分为0.259;三队列LOCO-CV平均AUC = 0.654 (范围0.513~0.846)。结论:本研究在PE胎盘组织中筛选出以YWHAB、TIMM22和TMEM45A为核心的候选差异表达基因,并构建了以13个基因为核心的LASSO候选诊断面板。该模型在发现队列内部具有良好判别能力,但外部队列和留一队列验证提示跨队列泛化能力有限,仍需在更大规模、表型一致且平台标准化的独立队列中进一步验证。
Abstract: Objective: To identify key differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in placental tissues from patients with preeclampsia (PE) compared with normal pregnant women, evaluate their clinical diagnostic value, and exploratorily construct candidate diagnostic models. Methods: Three PE placental tissue gene expression datasets, GSE74341, GSE10588, and GSE25906, were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) public database. DEGs were screened, and bioinformatics approaches were used to perform Gene Ontology (GO) over-representation analysis and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to investigate their biological functions. A primary diagnostic model was constructed using LASSO regression, with random forest and support vector machine models used for sensitivity analysis. Model performance was evaluated using nested five-fold cross-validation, independent external validation, and leave-one-cohort-out cross-validation. Results: A total of 686 significant DEGs were identified, including 347 upregulated and 339 downregulated genes. GO enrichment analysis showed that these DEGs were mainly involved in biological processes such as response to oxygen levels, response to hypoxia, response to decreased oxygen levels, and ossification. GSEA suggested trend-level enrichment of pathways including adipocytokine signaling, cell cycle, and cell adhesion molecule interactions. A 13-gene diagnostic panel was constructed using the LASSO algorithm, consisting of YWHAB, TIMM22, TMEM45A, KARS, QPCT, SDHC, ARHGEF16, CCNH, CLN6, CNOT2, COPS5, EGFR, and EPC2. Among these, YWHAB, TIMM22, and TMEM45A were stable genes across folds, with selection frequencies of ≥ 80%. In nested cross-validation within the discovery cohort, the model achieved an AUC of 0.937, 95% CI: 0.870~0.989, with sensitivity of 0.875, specificity of 0.944, accuracy of 0.912, and a Brier score of 0.139. In the independent external validation cohort GSE25906, the model achieved an AUC of 0.659, 95% CI: 0.510~0.803, with sensitivity of 0.696, specificity of 0.703, accuracy of 0.700, and a Brier score of 0.259. The mean AUC in three-cohort leave-one-cohort-out cross-validation was 0.654, with a range of 0.513~0.846. Conclusion: This study identified candidate DEGs centered on YWHAB, TIMM22, and TMEM45A in PE placental tissues and constructed a 13-gene LASSO-based candidate diagnostic panel. The model showed good discriminative performance within the discovery cohort; however, external validation and leave-one-cohort-out validation indicated limited cross-cohort generalizability. Further validation in larger independent cohorts with consistent phenotypes and standardized platforms is warranted.
文章引用:李剑霞, 李蔷. 基于GEO数据库对子痫前期关键基因筛选及 诊断模型构建的研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(7): 1096-1106. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1672623

参考文献

[1] 金璟, 何路路, 陈园, 等. 子痫前期胎盘组织中差异表达基因及其临床意义[J]. 广东医学, 2023, 44(9): 1142-1149.
[2] Poon, L.C., Shennan, A., Hyett, J.A., et al. (2019) The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Initiative on Pre-Eclampsia: A Pragmatic Guide for First-Trimester Screening and Prevention. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 145, 1-33.
[3] (2020) Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin Summary, Number 222. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 135, 1492-1495.
[4] 苏朔瑶. 基于生物信息学筛选子痫前期潜在生物标志物及临床风险预测模型的构建与验证[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2024.
[5] Melchiorre, K., Giorgione, V. and Thilaganathan, B. (2022) The Placenta and Preeclampsia: Villain or Victim? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 226, S954-S962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Hu, M., Li, J., Baker, P.N. and Tong, C. (2022) Revisiting Preeclampsia: A Metabolic Disorder of the Placenta. The FEBS Journal, 289, 336-354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Rana, S., Lemoine, E., Granger, J.P. and Karumanchi, S.A. (2019) Preeclampsia: Pathophysiology, Challenges, and Perspectives. Circulation Research, 124, 1094-1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Ma’ayeh, M. and Costantine, M.M. (2020) Prevention of Preeclampsia. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 25, Article ID: 101123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Redman, C.W.G. and Sargent, I.L. (2000) Placental Debris, Oxidative Stress and Pre-Eclampsia. Placenta, 21, 597-602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Lyall, F., Bulmer, J.N., Duffie, E., Cousins, F., Theriault, A. and Robson, S.C. (2001) Human Trophoblast Invasion and Spiral Artery Transformation: The Role of PECAM-1 in Normal Pregnancy, Preeclampsia, and Fetal Growth Restriction. The American Journal of Pathology, 158, 1713-1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Ives, C.W., Sinkey, R., Rajapreyar, I., Tita, A.T.N. and Oparil, S. (2020) Preeclampsia—Pathophysiology and Clinical Presentations: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 76, 1690-1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Demeneva, V.V., Tolmacheva, E.N., Nikitina, T.V., Sazhenova, E.A., Yuriev, S.Y., Makhmutkhodzhaev, A.S., et al. (2023) Expression of the NUP153 and YWHAB Genes from Their Canonical Promoters and Alternative Promoters of the LINE-1 Retrotransposon in the Placenta of the First Trimester of Pregnancy. Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding, 27, 63-71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Valpadashi, A., Callegari, S., Linden, A., Neumann, P., Ficner, R., Urlaub, H., et al. (2021) Defining the Architecture of the Human TIM22 Complex by Chemical Crosslinking. FEBS Letters, 595, 157-168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Vangrieken, P., Al-Nasiry, S., Bast, A., Leermakers, P.A., Tulen, C.B.M., Schiffers, P.M.H., et al. (2021) Placental Mitochondrial Abnormalities in Preeclampsia. Reproductive Sciences, 28, 2186-2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Hu, X.Q. and Zhang, L. (2022) Mitochondrial Dysfunction in the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia. Current Hypertension Reports, 24, 157-172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Flamant, L., Roegiers, E., Pierre, M., Hayez, A., Sterpin, C., De Backer, O., et al. (2012) TMEM45A Is Essential for Hypoxia-Induced Chemoresistance in Breast and Liver Cancer Cells. BMC Cancer, 12, Article No. 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Aisagbonhi, O., Bui, T., Nasamran, C.A., St. Louis, H., Pizzo, D., Meads, M., et al. (2023) High Placental Expression of FLT1, LEP, PHYHIP and IL3RA—In Persons of African Ancestry with Severe Preeclampsia. Placenta, 144, 13-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Clemente, L. and Bird, I.M. (2023) The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Healthy Pregnancy and Preeclampsia. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology, 70, e220105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Armant, D.R., Fritz, R., Kilburn, B.A., Kim, Y.M., Nien, J.K., Maihle, N.J., et al. (2015) Reduced Expression of the Epidermal Growth Factor Signaling System in Preeclampsia. Placenta, 36, 270-278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Guo, J., He, H., Liu, Q., Zhang, F., Lv, J., Zeng, T., et al. (2015) Identification and Epigenetic Analysis of a Maternally Imprinted Gene Qpct. Molecules and Cells, 38, 859-865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Guo, J., Zheng, J., Li, R., Yao, J., Zhang, H., Wang, X., et al. (2025) Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Abnormal Angiogenesis and Placentation by Loss of Imprinted Glutaminyl-Peptide Cyclotransferase. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B, 26, 589-608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Park, S.G., Kim, H.J., Min, Y.H., Choi, E., Shin, Y.K., Park, B., et al. (2005) Human Lysyl-tRNA Synthetase Is Secreted to Trigger Proinflammatory Response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 6356-6361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Yun, K., Seo, Y., Oh, Y., Kim, S., Maeng, H.S., Cho, J.G., et al. (2025) Lysyl-tRNA Synthetase 1 Promotes Atherogenesis via Autophagy-Related Secretion and Inflammation. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 11099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]