高校硕士生绿色消费行为的心理机制的质性探索
A Qualitative Exploration of the Psychological Mechanism of Green Consumption Behavior among University Postgraduates
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.167344, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 时 勘*, 焦松明#:温州大学教育学院,浙江 温州;温州大学生态文明与环境治理实验室,浙江 温州;温州大学温州模式发展研究院,浙江 温州;夏国荣*, 唐伟杰, 陈 泳:温州大学教育学院,浙江 温州;温州大学生态文明与环境治理实验室,浙江 温州
关键词: 绿色消费行为心理机制高校硕士生价值驱动障碍调适Green Consumption Behavior Psychological Mechanism University Postgraduates Value-Driven Barrier Adaptation
摘要: 在我国生态文明建设背景下,绿色消费成为推动可持续发展的重要消费转型。高校硕士生作为高知群体的代表,其绿色消费行为对全社会具有引领作用。为系统探索其绿色消费行为的心理机制,本研究通过对25位高校硕士生的深度访谈,系统收集并分析质性资料,逐步提炼核心范畴并构建理论模型。研究发现,硕士生绿色消费行为的核心心理机制可概括为“价值驱动与障碍调适的双重路径”的动态模型:价值认同与情感体验提供内在动力,认知构建奠定判断基础,二者共同驱动个体进行绿色消费行为转化。该转化同时受到结构性障碍与社会心理障碍的约束,并与对外部支持系统的期待形成张力。本研究深化了对高校硕士生绿色消费行为心理机制的理解,为高校绿色教育提供系统的理论依据与实践启示。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the advancement of ecological civilization, green consumption has emerged as a critical pathway for promoting sustainable development. As representatives of highly educated individuals, university postgraduates’ green consumption behavior has a guiding role for society as a whole. To systematically explore the psychological mechanisms behind their green consumption behavior, this study conducted in-depth interviews with 25 university postgraduates, systematically collected and analyzed qualitative data, gradually refined core categories, and constructed a theoretical model. The study found that the core psychological mechanism of university postgraduates’ green consumption behavior can be summarized as a dynamic model of “a dual path of value-driven and obstacle-adjustment”: value identification and emotional experience provide intrinsic motivation, while cognitive construction lays the foundation for judgment; both jointly drive individuals to transform their green consumption behavior. This transformation is simultaneously constrained by structural and socio-psychological obstacles and creates tension with expectations of external support systems. This study deepens the understanding of the psychological mechanisms of university postgraduates’ green consumption behavior, providing a systematic theoretical basis and practical insights for green education in universities.
文章引用:时勘, 夏国荣, 焦松明, 唐伟杰, 陈泳 (2026). 高校硕士生绿色消费行为的心理机制的质性探索. 心理学进展, 16(7), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.167344

参考文献

[1] 陈凯, 肖敏(2012). 大学生绿色消费认知、态度、意愿以及行为的调查分析——以北京地区大学生为例. 企业经济, 31(3), 160-163.
[2] 龚思羽, 盛光华(2023). 产品绿色属性信息对消费者决策的双刃剑效应: 形成机理与边界机制. 心理科学进展, 31(9), 1611-1625.
[3] 李铁英, 马鑫(2020). 大学生绿色消费观培育探赜. 黑龙江高教研究, 38(1), 81-86.
[4] 罗琪(2017). 当代大学生消费观问题研究. 硕士学位论文, 杭州: 浙江理工大学.
[5] 戚海峰, 于辉, 向伟林, 孙韵益, 徐昌皓(2019). 绿色消费情境下消费者为什么会言行不一? 心理科学进展, 27(7), 1307-1319.
[6] 吴波, 李东进, 王财玉(2016). 基于道德认同理论的绿色消费心理机制. 心理科学进展, 24(12), 1829-1843.
[7] 雍挺俊(2019). 大学生低碳消费心理与行为分析——评《绿色消费》. 生态经济, 35(12), 230-231.
[8] 张洁梅, 秦维佳(2024). 绿色消费行为对亲社会行为的双刃剑效应: 基于道德自我认同和心理特权的中介机制. 经济与管理评论, 40(4), 112-122.
[9] 祖明, 程素蓉(2025). 消费者绿色消费行为研究综述. 中国市场, (17), 115-118.
[10] 郭子键, 孔京睿, 邓敏慧(2025). 绿色消费行为研究综述. 商场现代化, (6), 9-12.
[11] 薛晗素(2025). 绿色产品信息披露对绿色消费行为影响的研究述评. 江苏商论, (6), 10-14.
[12] 王璐, 高鹏(2010). 扎根理论及其在管理学研究中的应用问题探讨. 外国经济与管理, 32(12), 10-18.
[13] Ajzen, I. (2011). The Theory of Planned Behaviour: Reactions and Reflections. Psychology & Health, 26, 1113-1127.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Carlson, L., Grove, S. J., & Kangun, N. (1993). A Content Analysis of Environmental Advertising Claims: A Matrix Method Approach. Journal of Advertising, 22, 27-39.[CrossRef
[15] Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Vol. 27). Addison-Wesley.
[16] Hirsch, D., & Terlau, W. (2015). Sustainable Consumption and the Attitude-Behaviour-Gap Phenomenon—Causes and Measurements towards a Sustainable Development. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 6, 159-174.[CrossRef
[17] Li, J., & Lin, W. L. (2025). Untangling Emotion Pathways to Green Consumption: A Culture-Sensitive Conceptual Framework. Journal of Information System and Technology Management, 10, 339-353.[CrossRef
[18] Ottman, J. A., Stafford, E. R., & Hartman, C. L. (2006). Avoiding Green Marketing Myopia: Ways to Improve Consumer Appeal for Environmentally Preferable Products. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 48, 22-36.[CrossRef
[19] Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2015). Predicting Green Product Consumption Using Theory of Planned Behavior and Reasoned Action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 123-134.[CrossRef
[20] Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging Pro-Environmental Behaviour: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309-317.[CrossRef
[21] Wang, B., Deng, N., Liu, X., Sun, Q., & Wang, Z. (2021). Effect of Energy Efficiency Labels on Household Appliance Choice in China: Sustainable Consumption or Irrational Intertemporal Choice? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 169, Article ID: 105458.[CrossRef
[22] Westaby, J. D. (2005). Behavioral Reasoning Theory: Identifying New Linkages Underlying Intentions and Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98, 97-120.[CrossRef
[23] Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable Consumption: Green Consumer Behaviour When Purchasing Products. Sustainable Development, 18, 20-31.[CrossRef
[24] Żemigala, M., Wiśniewska, A., Liczmańska-Kopcewicz, K., Kiresiewa, Z., & Tuovila, H. (2025). A Novel Integrated Structural Model of Green Consumer Purchasing Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review with COM-B Framework Perspective. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20, 745-801.[CrossRef
[25] Zhang, M., Zhang, R., Li, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Knowing Green, Buying Green: University Students Green Knowledge and Green Purchase Behavior. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article No. 732.[CrossRef