AIGC赋能建筑专业中职教师专业素养提升的内在机理与实现路径
AIGC-Enabled Improvement of Secondary Vocational Architecture Teachers’ Professional Literacy: Internal Mechanism and Implementation Path
摘要: 生成式人工智能(AIGC)的快速发展对建筑专业中职教师专业素养提出了新的要求。本文以文化历史活动理论(CHAT)为分析框架,揭示AIGC赋能建筑专业中职教师专业素养提升的内在机理。研究发现,AIGC介入后,教师专业活动系统在工具–对象、对象–规则、共同体–分工、主体–工具四个关系节点产生结构性矛盾,依次推动专业知识素养从知识掌握转向规范校验、实践教学素养从课堂演示转向虚实融合设计、数字智能素养从工具使用转向循证协同、伦理责任素养从被动遵规转向主动把关。在此基础上,提出“资源–能力”“场域–设计”“共同体–循证”“反思–伦理”四条实现路径,为建筑专业中职教师在AIGC时代实现专业素养的结构性提升提供理论参照与实践指引。
Abstract: The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (AIGC) has created new demands for the professional competence of secondary vocational teachers in architecture and construction programs. Drawing on cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT), this study examines the underlying mechanisms through which AIGC supports the enhancement of teachers’ professional competence in architecture and construction programs. The analysis shows that the introduction of AIGC generates structural contradictions within teachers’ professional activity systems at four relational nodes: tool-object, object-rules, community-division of labor, and subject-tool. These contradictions drive four corresponding shifts: professional knowledge competence moves from knowledge mastery to code- and standards-based verification; practice-oriented teaching competence shifts from classroom demonstration to the design of virtual-physical integrated learning environments; digital intelligence competence develops from tool use to evidence-based collaboration; and ethical responsibility competence changes from passive compliance to proactive gatekeeping. On this basis, the study proposes four implementation pathways, namely “resource-capability”, “context-design”, “community-evidence”, and “reflection-ethics”. These pathways provide theoretical reference and practical guidance for the structural enhancement of professional competence among secondary vocational teachers in architecture and construction programs in the AIGC era.
文章引用:杨云磊. AIGC赋能建筑专业中职教师专业素养提升的内在机理与实现路径[J]. 职业教育发展, 2026, 15(7): 216-223. https://doi.org/10.12677/ve.2026.157300

参考文献

[1] 教育部教师队伍建设专家指导委员会. 教师生成式人工智能应用指引(第一版)[EB/OL]. 2025-11-28.
https://www.edu.cn/xxh/focus/zc/202511/t20251128_2704300.shtml, 2026-05-31.
[2] 徐国庆, 蔡金芳, 姜蓓佳, 等. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能与未来职业教育[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 64-77.
[3] 住房和城乡建设部, 国家发展改革委, 科技部, 等. 住房和城乡建设部等部门关于推动智能建造与建筑工业化协同发展的指导意见[EB/OL]. 2020-07-03.
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-07/28/content_5530762.htm, 2026-05-31.
[4] 住房和城乡建设部. 住房和城乡建设部关于印发“十四五”建筑业发展规划的通知[EB/OL]. 2022-01-19.
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-01/27/content_5670687.htm, 2026-05-31.
[5] 李晓旭. 职业教育数字化转型的理论、价值、困境与对策[J]. 广州广播电视大学学报, 2023, 23(5): 1-6.
[6] 朱梦阳. BIM技术在中职建筑施工技术课程教学中的应用[J]. 科学技术与可持续发展, 2025, 1(9): 38-40.
[7] 中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于印发《中等职业学校教师专业标准(试行)》的通知[EB/OL]. 2013-09-20.
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s6991/201309/t20130924_157939.html, 2026-05-30.
[8] 中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于发布《教师数字素养》教育行业标准的通知[EB/OL]. 2022-11-30.
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/202302/t20230214_1044634.html, 2026-05-30.
[9] 胡伟. 人工智能何以赋能教师发展——教师人工智能素养的构成要素及生成路径[J]. 教师教育学报, 2024, 11(2): 39-47.
[10] 吴砥, 郭庆, 李佳平. 智能技术进步何以赋能教师发展[J]. 教育研究, 2025, 46(5): 43-54.
[11] 吴砥, 桂徐君, 周驰, 等. 教师数字素养: 内涵、标准与评价[J]. 电化教育研究, 2023, 44(8): 108-114, 128.
[12] 宋灵青. 我国中小学教师数字素养的实然状态与突破路径——基于全国9405名中小学教师的测评[J]. 中国电化教育, 2023(12): 113-120.
[13] 韦妙, 毛洪睿. 数字化转型背景下职业院校教师数字素养提升的困境与出路——基于《教师数字素养》标准[J]. 职业教育研究, 2024(5): 54-60.
[14] Pan, Y. and Zhang, L. (2021) Roles of Artificial Intelligence in Construction Engineering and Management: A Critical Review and Future Trends. Automation in Construction, 122, Article ID: 103517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Boje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S. and Rezgui, Y. (2020) Towards a Semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for Future Research. Automation in Construction, 114, Article ID: 103179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. and Punamäki, R.L. (1999) Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Yamagata-Lynch, L.C. (2010) Activity Systems Analysis Methods: Understanding Complex Learning Environments. Springer. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef