双语推广背景下侗语活态传承的现实挑战与路径优化
The Practical Challenges and Path Optimization for the Living Inheritance of the Dong Language in the Context of Bilingual Promotion
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2026.147649, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 苏家惠:广西科技大学人文艺术与设计学院,广西 柳州;张发钦*:广西科技大学马克思主义学院,广西 柳州
关键词: 双语推广侗族语言活态传承路径优化Bilingual Promotion Dong Language Living Inheritance Path Optimization
摘要: 在国家通用语言文字高质量推广与少数民族语言科学保护并重的政策导向下,侗语作为承载民族认同、族群记忆与文化内涵的核心载体,其活态传承面临全球化、现代化与城镇化的多重冲击,呈现结构性濒危态势。本文立足我国侗族人口最集中,文化保留最完整的湘黔桂交界侗族聚居区,系统描摹侗语生态基底,剖析其活态传承的现实挑战与深层制约因素,并探索协同赋能的优化路径。研究发现,当前侗语存续呈现空间分异、代际断裂、场域萎缩、教育缺位的复合特征:核心聚居区母语保留相对完整,散居区与城镇社区母语使用近乎消亡;中老年群体侗语能力稳定,青少年传承断层显著;家庭域收缩化、公共域边缘化、仪式域符号化,语言实用功能持续弱化;双语教育碎片化、师资与教材严重不足,制度化传承体系尚未建立。究其根源,制度供给不足、市场功利化取向、社会结构变迁、文字体系薄弱与文化自信欠缺,共同构成侗语传承的多重桎梏。基于此,本文构建“政府引导、学校主导、家庭参与、技术支撑、社区协同”的五维赋能体系,提出深化双语融合教育、培育本土专业人才、赋能文旅业态创新、推进数字化资源建设、强化社会协同机制五大路径,旨在兼顾国家通用语普及与侗语活态延续,为少数民族语言保护与多元文化共生提供实践参考。
Abstract: Under the national policy that equally prioritizes the high-quality promotion of the standard Chinese language and the scientific preservation of ethnic minority languages, the Dong language—as a core vehicle for ethnic identity, communal memory, and cultural essence—faces multifaceted challenges from globalization, modernization, and urbanization in its living transmission, exhibiting structural vulnerability. This study focuses on the Dong ethnic settlement zone at the Hunan-Guizhou-Guangxi border, where the Dong population is most concentrated and cultural preservation remains most intact. It systematically maps the ecological foundation of the Dong language, analyzes practical challenges and underlying constraints in its living transmission, and explores optimized pathways for collaborative empowerment. The research reveals that current Dong language preservation exhibits composite characteristics: spatial heterogeneity, intergenerational disconnection, territorial shrinkage, and educational neglect. In core settlements, the mother tongue remains relatively intact, while its use has nearly vanished in scattered communities and urban areas. Middle-aged and elderly speakers maintain stable proficiency, whereas youth transmission shows significant gaps. Family-based domains have contracted, public domains become marginalized, and ritual domains have become symbolicized, leading to continuous weakening of the language’s practical function. Bilingual education remains fragmented, with severe shortages of teachers and teaching materials, and no institutionalized transmission system has been established. At its core, insufficient institutional support, market-driven utilitarianism, social structural changes, weak writing systems, and lack of cultural confidence collectively constitute multiple barriers to Dong language preservation. Based on this, the paper establishes a five-dimensional empowerment framework characterized by “government guidance, school leadership, family participation, technological support, and community collaboration.” It proposes five key approaches: deepening bilingual integrated education, cultivating local professional talents, fostering innovation in cultural and tourism sectors, advancing digital resource development, and strengthening social coordination mechanisms. These measures aim to balance the promotion of the national common language with the preservation of the Dong language’s living heritage, providing practical references for minority language protection and multicultural coexistence.
文章引用:苏家惠, 张发钦. 双语推广背景下侗语活态传承的现实挑战与路径优化[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(7): 305-315. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.147649

参考文献

[1] 全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 中华人民共和国国家通用语言文字法[S]. 北京: 中国法治出版社, 2025.
[2] 广西壮族自治区人民代表大会常务委员会. 广西壮族自治区少数民族语言文字工作条例[S]. 南宁: 广西民族出版社, 2018.
[3] Hinton, L. (2022) Language Ecology and Endangered Languages. Oxford University Press.
[4] Wei, W. (2017) Cantonese with an Accent Identity and Symbolic Power in Guangdong. Proceedings of 2017 3rd International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2017), 121, 72-75.
[5] 左广明. 语言生态学视角下少数民族语言的保护[J]. 贵州民族研究, 2018, 39(2): 215-218.
[6] 王桂亮. 语言多样性实质及其生态伦理规约[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2018, 49(3): 13-20.
[7] 李瀚腾. 科学保护各民族语言文字的路径选择[N]. 贵州民族报, 2025-09-03(B01).
[8] Vosters, R., Pérez Rodríguez, S. and Vande Casteele, A. (2025) Spanish as Immigrant Minority Language in Brussels: A Pilot Study on Maintenance and Vitality. Languages, 10, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 伍莎莎. 三江侗族自治县中学生语言使用情况调查研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南宁: 广西民族大学, 2024.
[10] 张勤. 侗族大歌在当代舞台的符号转化与音声重构[J]. 黄河之声, 2026(8): 16-21.
[11] 令狐玉屏. 中国西南地区侗族青少年语言态度的社会语言学研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广东外语外贸大学, 2020.
[12] Nur Hakim, M., et al. (2025) Language, Identity, and Survival: An Ethnographic Study on the Revitalization of the Limola Language in South Sulawesi. Frontiers in Sociology, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 秦中应. 文化共生视域下民族教育发展走向[J]. 试题与研究, 2019(7): 123-124.
[14] 陈保亚. 家庭语言环境: 传承母语的最后家园[J]. 语言战略研究, 2017, 2(6): 81.
[15] 努尔麦麦提∙图尔荪. 喀什地区泽普县少数民族高中数学双语教学研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2024.
[16] Schneider, B. and Oliveira, M. (2025) Developing Critical AI Language Literacy—Prompting Experiments on Raciolinguistic Bias to Understand Large Language Models as Cultural Artefacts. AI and Society, 41, 3015-3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 黄俪媛, 黄秋域, 赖洪霄, 等. 活态传承视角下“虽蕾”壮语山歌的文化传承和保护[J]. 北极光, 2026(3): 158-160.
[18] 严妍. 我国少数民族语言文化数字化保护与研究[J]. 中国民族博览, 2024(15): 228-230.
[19] 贾连庆. 信息化时代我国少数民族语言保护的困境与出路[J]. 边疆经济与文化, 2023(1): 65-68.
[20] 湖南省民族宗教事务委员会. 第七次全国人口普查侗族人口数据[EB/OL].
http://mzw.hunan.gov.cn/mzw/tslm_71320/hnmz/202601/t20260107_33888323.html, 2026-01-07.
[21] 国家语言资源监测与研究少数民族语言中心. 侗族(少数民族语言文字使用、发展与保护情况) [EB/OL].
https://nmlr.muc.edu.cn/info/1119/2232.htm, 2026-07-09.
[22] 胡春晚, 林晓媚. 广西少数民族学生语言使用与语言态度调查研究[J]. 现代语文, 2020(9): 84-90.
[23] 何彦诚. 中国语言文化典藏·三江侗语[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2023.
[24] 张景霓, 苏丹. 广西三江侗语使用情况及演变趋势预测[J]. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学), 2016, 38(2): 191-196.
[25] 李胜兰. 护根与续脉: 从侗语电影《童年的稻田》看三江侗族语言的代际传承及母语文化保护[J]. 广西民族研究, 2023(1): 132-140.
[26] 李智芳, 薛鑫鑫. 侗族大歌的现代化传承、传播及实施路径[J]. 中国民族博览, 2022(20): 7-12.
[27] 黔东南州民族宗教事务委员会. 州民宗委关于州政协十三届四次会议第189号提案的答复[EB/OL].
http://mzw.qdn.gov.cn/zwgk_5825576/xxgkml/jytabl/zxtadf/202507/t20250714_88285430.html, 2026-07-09.
[28] 蒋拓新, 周艳青. 语言磨蚀研究视角下少数民族语言的传承和保护[J]. 名作欣赏, 2020(5): 182-184.
[29] 洪艳, 李丽生. 乡村振兴背景下无文字少数民族青少年学生母语词汇磨蚀调查研究——以湖南省通道县侗族为例[J]. 信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 42(5): 112-118.
[30] 李本建, 王雪宁. 媒介融合背景下三江侗族自治县古村落旅游开发策略[J]. 柳州职业技术学院学报, 2022, 22(6): 6-11.
[31] 覃小华, 卢素菊. 乡村振兴背景下旅游发展对民族村寨的影响研究——以程阳八寨为例[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2021, 32(13): 70-73.