和谐话语视角下中国海洋生态治理话语研究——以《中国的海洋生态环境保护》白皮书英译本为例
A Study of China’s Marine Ecological Governance Discourse from the
Perspective of Harmonious
Discourse—A Case Study of the English Version of Marine Eco-Environmental Protection in China
摘要: 以《中国的海洋生态环境保护》白皮书英译本为语料,旨在探讨中国海洋生态治理话语如何通过语言资源建构生态价值、传递生态理念、表征生态实践。研究采用定性与定量相结合的方法,首先借助UAM Corpus Tool 3.3软件对语料进行过程类型标注与分析,其次结合语料库工具Sketch Engine,考察高频动词的搭配模式及其语义韵,以揭示词汇层面的意义倾向。研究发现,物质过程占比最高,关系过程、心理过程和存在过程作为补充,并经由合法化、亲和与身份建构三种话语策略,共同落实了和谐话语的制约、亲近和良知三原则及“以人为本”核心假定。白皮书话语凸显制度先行、协同共建、生态惠民的海洋生态治理导向,彰显生态优先、可持续发展、人与自然和谐共生的治理理念。及物性与语义韵结合可为生态话语分析提供微观语言学视角,为理解中国海洋生态治理理念与话语实践提供参考。
Abstract: Using the English translation of the white paper Marine Eco-Environmental Protection in China as a corpus, this study explores how China’s marine ecological governance discourse constructs ecological values, conveys ecological philosophies, and represents ecological practices through linguistic resources. A combined qualitative and quantitative approach is adopted. The UAM Corpus Tool 3.3 is used to annotate and analyze the process types in the corpus and the corpus tool Sketch Engine is employed to examine the collocational patterns and semantic prosodies of high-frequency verbs, thereby revealing the meaning orientations at the lexical level. The findings show that material processes account for the highest proportion, supplemented by relational, mental, and existential processes. Realized through three discourse strategies of legitimation, affinity, and identity construction, they together enact the three principles of Harmonious Discourse—containment, affinity, and conscience as well as its core assumption of “people-orientedness”. The discourse of the white paper highlights a marine ecological governance orientation characterized by institutional precedence, collaborative co-construction, and ecological benefits for the people, reflecting governance philosophies of ecological priority, sustainable development, and harmonious coexistence between humans and nature. The combination of transitivity and semantic prosody offers a micro-linguistic perspective for ecological discourse analysis and provides a reference for understanding China’s marine ecological governance concepts and discursive practices.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
https://read.cnki.net/web/Journal/Article/XWAH202411006.html
|
|
[2]
|
黄国文, 赵蕊华. 生态话语分析的缘起、目标、原则与方法[J]. 现代外语, 2017, 40(5): 585-596, 729.
|
|
[3]
|
Stubbs, M. (2001) Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. John Wiley & Sons.
|
|
[4]
|
黄国文. 外语教学与研究的生态化取向[J]. 中国外语, 2016, 13(5): 1, 9-13.
|
|
[5]
|
Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Polity.
|
|
[6]
|
https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/xwj201617011
|
|
[7]
|
Stibbe, A. (2015) Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
汪少华, 纪燕. 生态话语的批评架构分析——以《变革我们的世界: 2030年可持续发展议程》为例[J]. 中国外语, 2019, 16(5): 59-67.
|
|
[9]
|
曹进, 李怡然. 黄河专题新闻报道中的和谐生态故事建构[J]. 中国外语, 2023, 20(3): 56-64.
|
|
[10]
|
Halliday, M.A.K. (2000) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
|
|
[11]
|
Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse (Vol. 270). Routledge.
|
|
[12]
|
陈鹏, 朱雪敏. 高质量发展时期我国产教融合政策的话语表征及优化策略[J]. 中国职业技术教育, 2024(28): 14-26.
|
|
[13]
|
张帆. 近十年中央政府工作报告的语篇衔接研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西南交通大学, 2011.
|
|
[14]
|
姜雪, 刘薇. 从语言的元功能看政治演讲——以奥巴马2008年大选获胜演说为例[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 11(4): 360-365.
|
|
[15]
|
van Leeuwen, T. (2008) Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|