社会主义核心价值观融入 《中国法律史》课程 改革路径探析

Analysis on the Integration of Socialist Core Values into the Curriculum Reform Path of China Legal History

摘要: “立德树人、德法兼修”是新时代法学教育的目标和根本任务，也是思想政治工作贯穿法学教育的关键指引。社会主义核心价值观是中国传统优秀文化的继承和发展，将社会主义核心价值观融入《中国法律史》课程，既是落实课程思政建设的政策要求，也是这门课程的内在使命。然而，当前融入实践面临三重困境：价值层面“德”与“法”的疏离、内容层面传统与现代的断裂、方法层面灌输与启发的失衡。本文在梳理《中国法律史》课程思政资源的基础上，提出三重改革路径：价值重塑层面，挖掘“民本”“和合”“仁爱”等传统理念与社会主义核心价值观的呼应关系，建立“德法共治”的解释框架；内容重构层面，以“创造性转化”为主线，建立“古今对话”的教学叙事；方法创新层面，以“沉浸式体验”打破单向灌输，实现价值内化。研究认为，《中国法律史》的课程思政不是“专业内容”与“思政元素”的简单叠加，而应在历史纵深中实现“知识传授–能力培养–价值引领”的有机统一。

Abstract: “Cultivating virtue and nurturing talents, while integrating moral and legal education” represents the goal and fundamental task of legal education in the new era, as well as the key guiding principle for ideological and political work throughout legal education. The core socialist values are the inheritance and development of China’s traditional excellent culture. Integrating these values into the course History of Chinese Law not only fulfills the policy requirements for implementing ideological and political education within curricula but also constitutes the intrinsic mission of this course. However, current integration faces three major challenges: at the value level, a disconnection between “morality” and “law”; at the content level, a rupture between tradition and modernity; and at the methodological level, an imbalance between indoctrination and inspiration. Based on an analysis of the ideological and political resources in History of Chinese Law, this paper proposes three reform pathways: at the value-reconstruction level, exploring the resonance between traditional concepts such as “people-oriented governance”, “harmony and unity”, and “benevolence” with core socialist values to establish an interpretive framework of “joint governance of morality and law”; at the content-reconstruction level, adopting “creative transformation” as the central approach to develop a teaching narrative of “dialogue between ancient and modern perspectives”; and at the methodological innovation level, employing “immersive experiences” to break away from one-way indoctrination and achieve value internalization. The study argues that ideological and political education in History of Chinese Law should not be a simple combination of “professional content” and “ideological elements”, but rather achieve an organic integration of “knowledge transmission, capability cultivation, and value guidance” within a historical context.