ESG表现对企业价值的影响研究
Research on the Impact of ESG Performance on Corporate Value
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2026.157550, PDF,   
作者: 白浩杰:天津职业技术师范大学经济与管理学院,天津
关键词: ESG企业价值行业异质性制造业信息服务业ESG Enterprise Value Industry Heterogeneity Manufacturing Industry Information Service Industry
摘要: 基于2020~2024年中国A股上市公司数据,分析了ESG表现对企业价值的影响,并重点关注了行业异质性的调节作用。结果表明,尽管ESG的总体平均效应并不显著,但其影响在不同行业间存在显著差异:在制造业中,ESG对企业价值有积极影响,而对信息服务业则呈现负向影响。机制分析证实,ESG主要通过提升市场预期(以TobinQ衡量)创造价值,而非直接影响短期财务绩效(如ROE)。研究显示,ESG的价值效应高度依赖行业属性,其积极作用需结合行业特征才能有效发挥。最后,从监管政策、评级体系和投资者教育三个方面提出差异化建议,为推进ESG实践提供理论依据与政策参考。
Abstract: This study employs data from Chinese A-share listed companies between 2020 and 2024 to analyze how ESG performance influences enterprise value, with particular attention to the role of industry heterogeneity. Results show that while the overall average effect of ESG is not significant, its impact varies considerably across industries: ESG positively affects firm value in manufacturing but exhibits a negative relationship in the information services sector. Further mechanism analysis reveals that ESG enhances value primarily by elevating market expectations (as captured by Tobin’s Q), rather than through short-term financial performance (e.g., ROE). These findings underscore that the value effect of ESG is highly dependent on industry attributes, and its positive role can only be effectively realized when combined with industry-specific characteristics. The study concludes by offering tailored recommendations in three areas: regulatory policy, rating systems, and investor education, providing theoretical and practical guidance for implementing ESG practices in China.
文章引用:白浩杰. ESG表现对企业价值的影响研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(7): 94-102. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.157550

参考文献

[1] Eccles, R.G., Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G. (2014) The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science, 60, 2835-2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 李韵, 丁林峰, 宋欣洋. 社会责任、媒体关注对企业创新融资约束的协同效应[J]. 上海经济研究, 2025(4): 73-88.
[3] Friede, G., Busch, T. and Bassen, A. (2015) ESG and Financial Performance: Aggregated Evidence from More than 2000 Empirical Studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5, 210-233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Aupperle, K.E., Carroll, A.B. and Hatfield, J.D. (1985) An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446-463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 邹静娴, 盖子琪, 申广军, 等. 官方环保表态能否提升碳信息披露企业股价?——来自“双碳”目标提出的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2024(12): 170-187.
[6] Hsu, P.-H., Li, K. and Tsou, C.-Y. (2023) The Pollution Premium. The Journal of Finance, 78, 1343-1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Sharfman, M.P. and Fernando, C.S. (2008) Environmental Risk Management and the Cost of Capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 569-592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 沈洪涛, 马正彪. 地区经济发展压力、企业环境表现与债务融资[J]. 金融研究, 2014(2): 153-166.
[10] 李晓溪, 杨国超, 饶品贵. 交易所问询函有监管作用吗?——基于并购重组报告书的文本分析[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(5): 181-198.
[11] 王琳璘, 廉永辉, 董捷. ESG表现对企业价值的影响机制研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2022(5): 23-34.
[12] 张敏, 李博. 企业数字化能够保护利益相关者权益吗?——基于企业内部控制的中介效应研究[J]. 南京财经大学学报, 2023(1): 87-97.
[13] 李姝, 谢晓嫣. 民营企业的社会责任、政治关联与债务融资——来自中国资本市场的经验证据[J]. 南开管理评论, 2014, 17(6): 30-40+95.
[14] Khan, M., Serafeim, G. and Yoon, A. (2016) Corporate Sustainability: First Evidence on Materiality. The Accounting Review, 91, 1697-1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef