生态马克思主义视角下地租理论与自然空间 商品化
Land Rent Theory and the Commodification of Natural Space from the Perspective of Ecological Marxism
摘要: 随着资本主义生态危机不断加剧,传统马克思主义对自然空间商品化的分析大多将焦点聚焦在劳动价值论方面,却忽略了土地作为自然条件在资本积累过程当中的特殊作用。生态马克思主义揭示出了资本以及自然的矛盾,不过较少系统地探讨地租理论是怎样解释自然空间转变为可交易商品的过程。研究基于生态马克思主义视角,对马克思地租理论进行重审,并结合国际批判地理学与空间生产理论的前沿成果,探究在当代市场经济背景下,地租机制如何驱动自然空间商品化并加剧生态的退化。通过分析绝对地租、级差地租以及垄断地租在土地、水资源、大气等自然要素当中的运作逻辑,并辅以张家界武陵源景区的案例研究,文章发现:地租调节着资本对自然空间的占有与分配,通过价格信号将自然条件纳入到资本循环当中,让自然空间成为能够定价、可以交换的资产。这一过程使得自然使用价值被交换价值所遮蔽,生态系统的整体性出现碎片化,并会引发资源耗竭、污染转移以及空间不平等。研究进一步指出,融入国家政策与社会行动者考量的生态马克思主义地租分析,能够揭示出资本积累地理扩张以及生态极限的内在张力,为理解当代环境冲突提供一个超越传统政治经济学的解释框架。
Abstract: As capitalist ecological crises continue to worsen, traditional Marxist analyses of the commodification of natural space largely center on the labor theory of value, while neglecting the unique role of land as a natural condition in the process of capital accumulation. Ecological Marxism has exposed the contradictions between capital and nature, yet few studies have systematically explored how land rent theory explains the transformation of natural space into tradable commodities. From the perspective of ecological Marxism, this study re-examines Marx’s land rent theory and incorporates cutting-edge achievements in international critical geography and the theory of spatial production. It explores how the land rent mechanism drives the commodification of natural space and exacerbates ecological degradation under the contemporary market economy. By analyzing the operational logic of absolute rent, differential rent, and monopoly rent applied to natural elements such as land, water resources, and the atmosphere, alongside a case study of Wulingyuan Scenic Area in Zhangjiajie, this paper concludes that land rent regulates capital’s possession and distribution of natural space. It integrates natural conditions into the circulation of capital via price signals, turning natural space into priceable and exchangeable assets. In this process, the use value of nature is overshadowed by exchange value, the integrity of ecosystems becomes fragmented, and a series of problems arise, including resource depletion, pollution transfer, and spatial inequality. The study further indicates that ecological Marxist analysis of land rent, incorporating national policies and social actors, can reveal the inherent tensions between the geographical expansion of capital accumulation and ecological limits, providing an interpretive framework beyond traditional political economy for understanding contemporary environmental conflicts.
文章引用:代薇薇. 生态马克思主义视角下地租理论与自然空间 商品化[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(7): 109-115. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.157552

参考文献

[1] 陈硕, 董坤. 中国式现代化的土地逻辑探析: 基于马克思地租理论的视角[J]. 南京社会科学, 2026(4): 31-41.
[2] 陈润姣, 罗海军. 地租理论视域下林下经济的价值实现机制研究[J]. 村委主任, 2026(3): 230-232.
[3] 曾永恒. 农村土地流转增值收益的形成及其分配研究——基于马克思地租理论视角[J]. 中国经贸导刊, 2026(2): 106-108.
[4] 王淑琪, 蒋红群. 马克思地租理论视域下数字租金的批判性分析[J]. 创新, 2025, 19(6): 107-116.
[5] 杨文亮. 列宁与马克思《资本论》地租篇的研究“计划”——基于列宁对“合法马克思主义”地租理论的批判研究[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 2025(5): 135-142.
[6] 袁鑫. 数字地租问题探析——基于数字资本主义的考察[J]. 国外社会科学前沿, 2025(6): 89-100.
[7] Harvey, D. (2006) The Limits to Capital. Verso.
[8] 丁一. 马克思对资本主义级差地租的生态批判及其现实意义[J]. 通化师范学院学报, 2025, 46(3): 73-81.
[9] 刘进, 饶清玲. 乡村产业振兴视域下农地集中流转与地租上涨——基于地租理论的分析[J]. 世界农业, 2024(12): 86-96.
[10] 许庆, 杨青, 张霄. 农业投资与土地流转价格——基于地租理论视角[J]. 统计研究, 2024, 41(11): 104-116.
[11] 朱英伦, 王君玺. 马克思地租理论的时代启示: 坚持土地流转与集体经济并轨发展[J]. 农业经济, 2024(11): 96-98.
[12] 陈俊昆. 垄断地租与都市空间的生产——对列斐伏尔资本主义城市地租理论的批判性考察[J]. 当代国外马克思主义评论, 2024(2): 169-187.
[13] 李芸霞. 马克思地租理论的空间哲学意蕴研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海财经大学, 2020.