父母教养方式与青少年社交焦虑的关系: 社交网站上行社会比较和真实自我表达 的并行中介作用
The Relationship between Parenting Styles and Adolescent Social Anxiety: The Parallel Mediating Roles of Upward Social Comparison and Authentic Self-Expression on Social Networking Sites
摘要: 为考察数字化背景下父母教养方式影响青少年社交焦虑的内在机制,本研究引入社交网站上行社会比较、真实自我表达为并行中介变量,构建中介模型。采用简式父母教养方式量表、社交网站上行社会比较量表、社交网站真实自我表达量表及青少年社交焦虑量表,对四川省成都市1003名初一、初二、高一和高二的青少年开展问卷调查。结果显示:父母教养方式、社交网站上行社会比较、真实自我表达与社交焦虑两两显著相关;积极教养方式显著负向预测社交焦虑,消极教养方式显著正向预测社交焦虑;社交网站上行社会比较与真实自我表达均在父母教养方式与社交焦虑间发挥显著并行中介作用,且真实自我表达的中介效应更强。研究表明,家庭教养既可直接预测青少年社交焦虑,也可通过网络认知与行为间接作用,为家庭、学校、社会协同开展青少年心理健康教育提供理论依据与实践参考。
Abstract: To investigate the underlying mechanisms by which parental parenting styles influence adolescent social anxiety in the digital context, this study introduced upward social comparison and authentic self-expression on social media as parallel mediating variables to construct a mediation model. Using the Simplified Parenting Style Scale, Upward Social Comparison Scale on Social Media, Authentic Self-Expression Scale on Social Media, and Adolescent Social Anxiety Scale, a questionnaire survey was conducted among 1,003 adolescents from grade 7, grade 8; grade 10, grade 11 in Chengdu, Sichuan Province. The results demonstrated that parental parenting styles, upward social comparison on social media, and authentic self-expression all exhibited significant pairwise correlations with social anxiety; positive parenting styles negatively predicted social anxiety, whereas negative parenting styles, while positively predicted social anxiety; both upward social comparison and authentic self-expression played significant parallel mediating roles between parental parenting styles and social anxiety, with authentic self-expression demonstrating a stronger mediating effect. The study indicates that family parenting not only directly influences adolescent social anxiety but also indirectly affects it through online cognition and behavior, providing theoretical foundations and practical recommendations for collaborative mental health education efforts involving families, schools, and society.
文章引用:田昊, 谢雨欣, 熊昊天, 银兴钰, 龙娴 (2026). 父母教养方式与青少年社交焦虑的关系: 社交网站上行社会比较和真实自我表达 的并行中介作用. 心理学进展, 16(7), 258-270. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.167358

参考文献

[1] 陈泳如, 胡佳佳(2012). 青少年网络成瘾与教养方式、社会支持相关研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 20(5), 767-768.
[2] 丁倩, 罗星雨, 田俊(2023). 真实让人更健康吗? 社交网站真实自我表达对青少年抑郁的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 31(1), 170-174.
[3] 郭丽, 赵开维, 赵玉婷, 张亚亚, 杨官娥, 陈孜(2024). 父母积极教养方式对大学生网络成瘾的影响: 焦虑与抑郁的链式中介作用. 心理月刊, 19(23), 102-105, 110.
[4] 郭龙(2011). 儿童社交焦虑与父母教养方式、气质类型关系之探讨. 硕士学位论文, 济宁: 曲阜师范大学.
[5] 蒋奖, 鲁峥嵘, 蒋苾菁, 许燕(2010). 简式父母教养方式问卷中文版的初步修订. 心理发展与教育, 26(1), 94-99.
[6] 李梅(2022). 青少年父母教养方式、心理理论与社交焦虑的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 南宁: 南宁师范大学.
[7] 李小飞, 陈功香, 潘溪(2018). 社交网络中社会比较的研究进展. 鲁东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 35(3), 91-96.
[8] 李晓艳(2025). 父母忽视与初中生社交焦虑: 负面评价恐惧和注意偏向的中介作用及干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 贵阳:贵州师范大学.
[9] 连帅磊, 孙晓军, 牛更枫, 周宗奎(2017). 社交网站中的上行社会比较与抑郁的关系: 一个有调节的中介模型及性别差异. 心理学报, 49(7), 941-952.
[10] 刘丹霓, 李董平(2017). 父母教养方式与青少年网络成瘾: 自我弹性的中介和调节作用检验. 心理科学, 40(6), 1385-1391.
[11] 汤佳怡, 付成妤, 徐慰(2025). 青少年家庭功能对抑郁和社交焦虑的影响: 公正世界信念的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 41(5), 701-709.
[12] 童媛添, 邱晓雯, 连帅磊, 张苗苗(2017). 社交网站上行社会比较对青少年抑郁的影响: 社交焦虑的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(3), 498-501.
[13] 王志梅(2003). 初中生父母教养方式的调查研究. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 5(6), 87-93.
[14] 徐欢欢, 孙晓军, 周宗奎, 牛更枫, 连帅磊(2017). 社交网站中的真实自我表达与青少年孤独感: 自我概念清晰性的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(1), 137-141.
[15] 张丛丽, 周宗奎(2018). 被动性社交网站使用、社交焦虑、反刍思维与青少年抑郁的关系: 有调节的中介效应分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(3), 490-493, 497.
[16] 赵鑫, 张雅丽, 陈玲, 周仁来(2014). 人格特质对青少年社交焦虑的影响: 情绪调节方式的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(6), 1057-1061.
[17] 郑晓莹, 彭泗清, 彭璐珞(2015). “达”则兼济天下? 社会比较对亲社会行为的影响及心理机制. 心理学报, 47(2), 243-250.
[18] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, (6), 942-950.
[19] 朱海东(2008). 青少年依恋与社交焦虑的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[20] American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Publisher.[CrossRef
[21] Appel, H., Crusius, J., & Gerlach, A. L. (2015). Social Comparison, Envy, and Depression on Facebook: A Study Looking at the Effects of High Comparison Standards on Depressed Individuals. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34, 277-289.[CrossRef
[22] Chen, W., & Lee, K. H. (2013). Sharing, Liking, Commenting, and Distressed? The Pathway between Facebook Interaction and Psychological Distress. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 728-734.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (1994). Marital Conflict and Child Adjustment: An Emotional Security Hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 387-411.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.[CrossRef
[25] Forest, A. L., & Wood, J. V. (2012). When Social Networking Is Not Working: Individuals with Low Self-Esteem Recognize but Do Not Reap the Benefits of Self-Disclosure on Facebook. Psychological Science, 23, 295-302.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Gilbert, P. (2001). Evolution and Social Anxiety: The Role of Attraction, Social Competition, and Social Hierarchies. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 24, 723-751.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Grieve, R., & Watkinson, J. (2016). The Psychological Benefits of Being Authentic on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19, 420-425.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-Discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.[CrossRef
[29] Karasewich, T. A., & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (2020). Trait Social Anxiety as a Conditional Adaptation: A Developmental and Evolutionary Framework. Developmental Review, 55, Article ID: 100886.[CrossRef
[30] Kim, J., & Lee, J. R. (2011). The Facebook Paths to Happiness: Effects of the Number of Facebook Friends and Self-Presentation on Subjective Well-Being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 359-364.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] La Greca, A. M., & Lopez, N. (1998). Social Anxiety among Adolescents: Linkages with Peer Relations and Friendships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 83-94.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Liang, Z. B., Zhang, G. Z., Deng, H. H., Song, Y., & Zheng, W. M. (2013). A Multilevel Analysis of the Developmental Trajectory of Preschoolers’ Effortful Control and Prediction by Parental Parenting Style: A Multilevel Analysis of the Developmental Trajectory of Preschoolers’ Effortful Control and Prediction by Parental Parenting Style. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45, 556-567.[CrossRef
[33] McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship Formation on the Internet: What’s the Big Attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9-31.[CrossRef
[34] Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social Anxiety and Self-Presentation: A Conceptualization Model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 641-669.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Seidman, G. (2014). Expressing the “True Self” on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 367-372.[CrossRef
[36] Skocic, S., Jackson, H., & Hulbert, C. (2015). Beyond DSM-5: An Alternative Approach to Assessing Social Anxiety Disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 30, 8-15.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2008). Adolescents’ Identity Experiments on the Internet: Consequences for Social Competence and Self-Concept Unity. Communication Research, 35, 208-231.[CrossRef