平台媒介环境下新闻信源的可见性分配——基于微博三事件的内容分析
Visibility Distribution of News Sources in Platform Media Environments—A Content Analysis of Three Weibo Events
摘要: 平台媒介环境中,不同类型新闻信源的可见性分配呈现怎样的格局?本研究选取滴滴出行系统故障(技术事故)、儿童呼吸道疾病高发(公共卫生危机)、直播带货消费维权争议(社会文化争议)三个事件,对733条帖子进行量化内容分析。发现事件类型对新闻框架、信源类型和情感均具显著约束力;自媒体/KOL互动中位数最高(85);官方信源96.0%仅以二级可见性存在。回归显示“情绪化标题”(
β = 1.21)与“经济后果”(
β = 0.78)是互动量最强预测因子。本文认为平台环境下的信源可见性并非传统新闻价值的自然延伸,而是事件话语结构与平台算法驯化机制双重力量重构的结果。
Abstract: In platform media environments, what kind of patterns characterize the visibility distribution among different types of news sources? This study examines 733 posts through a quantitative content analysis across three typical events: the Didi Chuxing system outage (a technical accident), the surge in pediatric respiratory diseases (a public health crisis), and consumer rights disputes in livestream e-commerce (a socio-cultural controversy). The findings reveal that the type of event exerts a significant structural constraint on news frames, source selection, and emotional tendencies. Notably, self-media/Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) yielded the highest median engagement (85), whereas 96.0% of official sources manifested exclusively through secondary visibility. Regression analysis indicates that “emotional headlines” (β =1.21) and the “economic consequences frame” (β = 0.78) serve as the most powerful predictors of user interaction. This study concludes that source visibility within the platform ecosystem is not a spontaneous extension of traditional news values, but rather the product of structural reconfigurations shaped by the interplay between event-discursive structures and platform algorithmic domestication mechanisms.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Gillespie, T. (2014) The Relevance of Algorithms. In: Gillespie, T., et al., Eds., Media Technologies, The MIT Press, 167-194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
喻国明, 李钒. 生成式AI浪潮下平台型媒体的规则重构、价值逻辑与生态剧变[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 45(1): 167-175.
|
|
[3]
|
周葆华. 算法、可见性与注意力分配: 智能时代舆论基础逻辑的历史转换[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022(1): 143-152.
|
|
[4]
|
曾润喜, 张媛媛. 游击艺术与削足适履: 用户抵抗与服从算法的矛盾实践[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2025(4): 48-62.
|
|
[5]
|
宋思茹, 洪杰文. 数据适应与资本干预: 黑箱中的“算法反馈” [J]. 新闻记者, 2025(4): 18-34.
|
|
[6]
|
张志安, 陈经伟. 新闻业的数智化转型: 技术吸纳与价值调适——2025年中国新闻学研究述评[J]. 青年记者, 2026(1): 20-29.
|
|
[7]
|
Cotter, K. (2019) Playing the Visibility Game: How Digital Influencers and Algorithms Negotiate Influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 21, 895-913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
Entman, R.M. (1993) Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[9]
|
Couldry, N. and Hepp, A. (2017) The Mediated Construction of Reality. Polity Press.
|
|
[10]
|
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., Fico, F. and Watson, B.R (2019) Analyzing Media Messages. 4th Edition, Routledge.
|
|
[11]
|
师文, 陈昌凤. 全球智能传播研究2023年热点议题: 算法审计、算法文化与算法话语[J]. 全球传媒学刊, 2024, 11(1): 106-121.
|
|
[12]
|
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J. and Bracken, C.C. (2002) Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587-604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|