欧盟碳边境调节机制下我国碳市场衔接的法律问题研究
A Study on Legal Issues Concerning the Integration of China’s Carbon Market in the Context of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
摘要: 2026年欧盟碳边境调节机制正式进入证书购买阶段,我国碳排放权交易市场在法律层面面临核算认可、制度效力与数据合规三重对接障碍。CBAM将进口产品的碳成本与欧盟碳市场挂钩,而我国碳市场以免费配额为主、核算标准未获互认、相关立法层级较低且缺乏对外衔接条款,加之碳数据出境规则不清,导致出口企业陷入合规两难。本文在厘清CBAM法律性质的基础上,分析上述规范冲突,提出推动核算标准互认立法、提升碳市场法律位阶并植入衔接条款、建立碳数据出境专项合规机制及善用WTO争端解决等法律对策,主张以国内碳市场的法治升级回应单边碳边境措施。
Abstract: In 2026, the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) will officially enter the certificate purchase phase, and China’s carbon emissions trading market faces three major obstacles at the legal level: recognition of accounting methods, institutional effectiveness, and data compliance. CBAM links the carbon costs of imported products to the EU carbon market, whereas China’s carbon market primarily relies on free allowances, lacks mutual recognition of accounting standards, has legislation at a relatively low legal level, and lacks provisions for external alignment. Coupled with unclear rules regarding carbon data export, these factors have left exporting enterprises in a compliance dilemma. Building on a clarification of the legal nature of CBAM, this paper analyzes the aforementioned regulatory conflicts and proposes legal countermeasures, including promoting legislation for mutual recognition of accounting standards, elevating the legal status of the carbon market and incorporating linkage provisions, establishing a specialized compliance mechanism for carbon data exports, and making effective use of WTO dispute settlement. It advocates responding to unilateral carbon border measures through the legal upgrading of the domestic carbon market.
文章引用:罗梦婷. 欧盟碳边境调节机制下我国碳市场衔接的法律问题研究[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(7): 163-169. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.147208

参考文献

[1] 蔡守秋. 欧盟环境政策法律研究[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2002: 358-359.
[2] 蔡俊雄, 刘哲. 排污权交易理论与实践策略研究[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2021: 27.
[3] 陈铭杰. 欧盟碳边境调节机制的内容、影响及中国应对[J]. 财政科学, 202(2): 156-160.
[4] 曹晓路. “双碳”目标下我国碳税制度设计的法治机理[J]. 税务与经济, 2023(6): 49-50.
[5] 卞勇, 刘宇. 建立碳排放总量控制制度[J]. 开放导报, 2021(5): 14-20.
[6] 苏建兰. 中国碳交易市场构建框架和运行机制研究[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2018: 11-12.
[7] 程雨燕. 气候变化应对法律责任研究[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 13(2): 27-32.
[8] 段茂盛, 邓哲, 张海军. 碳排放权交易市场中市场调节的理论与实践[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2018(1): 92-100.
[9] 冯超, 袁晓华, 王琦, 等. 英国“碳底价”政策对完善我国碳定价机制的启示[J]. 财政科学, 2022(1): 152-160.
[10] 冯帅. “碳中和”立法: 欧盟经验与中国借鉴——以“原则-规则”为主线[J]. 环球法律评论, 2022, 44(4): 177-192.
[11] 海小辉, 杨宝臣. 欧盟排放交易体系与化石能源市场动态关系研究[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(7): 1442-1451.
[12] 郝海青, 毛建民. 欧盟碳排放权交易法律制度的变革及对我国的启示[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版), 2015(6): 82-87.
[13] 李鑫, 魏姗, 李惠娟. 美欧碳关税政策的发展、影响及中国应对[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2023, 33(5): 85-98.