AI赋能视域下商工融合的《数据结构》课程教学改革与实践
Teaching Reform and Practice of “Data Structures” Course with Business-Engineering Integration from the Perspective of AI Empowerment
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.1671476, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 周艳聪:天津商业大学信息工程学院,天津
关键词: AI赋能商工融合数据结构知识图谱案例教学AI Empowerment Business-Engineering Integration Data Structures Knowledge Graph Case Teaching
摘要: 教育数字化转型背景下,《数据结构》课程面临知识碎片化、教学同质化、应用脱节化三重困境。本文以天津商业大学教学改革为案例,提出“AI赋能、商工融合”的课程改革模式。具体路径包括:构建“知识–能力–资源”三维图谱实现内容结构化重构;嵌入AI助教与个性化学习系统形成全流程精准教学机制;设计商工融合案例培养学生解决商业复杂问题的高阶思维。教学实践表明:改革后实验组学生平均成绩较对照组提升10% (p < 0.001),高阶思维能力自评满意度达85%,课堂互动频次提升1.5倍。该模式为计算机核心课程的数智化转型提供了可操作的实践范式。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of digital transformation in education, the “Data Structures” course is confronted with three major dilemmas: fragmented knowledge, homogenized teaching and disconnection from practical application. Taking the teaching reform practice at Tianjin University of Commerce as an example, this paper proposes a reform model featuring “AI empowerment and business-engineering integration”. Specific measures are as follows: establishing a three-dimensional graph of “knowledge-competence-resource” to restructure course content in a systematic way; deploying AI teaching assistants and personalized learning systems to build a full-process targeted teaching mechanism; and developing integrated business and engineering cases to foster students’ higher-order thinking for solving complex commercial problems. Teaching results show that after the reform, the average score of students in the experimental group increased by 10% compared with the control group (p < 0.001). The self-rated satisfaction with the cultivation of higher-order thinking skills reached 85%, and the frequency of classroom interaction rose 1.5 times. This model offers a feasible practical paradigm for the digital and intelligent transformation of core computer courses.
文章引用:周艳聪. AI赋能视域下商工融合的《数据结构》课程教学改革与实践[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(7): 1113-1118. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1671476

参考文献

[1] 祝智庭, 胡姣. 教育数字化转型的本质探析与研究展望[J]. 中国电化教育, 2022(4): 1-8+25.
[2] Holmes, W., Bialik, M. and Fadel, C. (2019) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
[3] Novak, J.D. and Gowin, D.B. (1984) Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press.
[4] Sweller, J. (1994) Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty, and Instructional Design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 于歆杰. 《以学生为中心的教与学——利用慕课资源实施翻转课堂的实践(第2版)》[J]. 中国大学教学, 2017(12): 98.
[6] 管珏琪, 孙一冰, 祝智庭. 智慧教室环境下数据启发的教学决策研究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2019(2): 22-28+42.
[7] 司明, 厍向阳, 李占利, 等. 突出计算思维训练的数据结构教学实践[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2018, 37(5): 195-201.
[8] 王志海, 徐薇, 孙永奇. 面向“新工科”建设的复杂工程训练问题设计——以“数据结构”课程为例[J]. 工业和信息化教育, 2020(1): 64-69.
[9] 林健. 新工科建设: 强势打造“卓越工程师教育培养计划”升级版[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2017, 65(3): 7-14.
[10] 李培根. 工科何以而新[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2017, 65(4): 1-4+15.