工作面底板突水危险性评价研究综述
A Review of Research on Risk Assessment of Water Inrush from Coal Mine Working Face Floor
摘要: 我国煤矿开采逐步向深部拓展,底板突水灾害防控已成为决定矿井安全生产的关键问题。传统底板突水危险性评价方法多围绕隔水层厚度、水压等单一因素开展静态分析,既无法体现采动过程中岩层阻水性能的动态劣化规律,也难以揭示其与应力场、渗流场的耦合作用机制。文章系统梳理了底板突水机理、岩层阻水性能表征、采动效应影响规律、危险性评价方法四个领域的研究进展。现有研究已完成从单一因素经验判断到多场耦合数值模拟、微震监测与机器学习结合的综合评价体系的转变,但岩层阻水性能的定量表征尚未形成统一标准,采动效应与阻水性能的动态耦合机制亦未完全明确。后续研究可重点构建“阻水性能–采动损伤–渗流演化”一体化动态评价模型,结合智能化监测预警技术,进一步提高底板突水危险性评价的精度与工程适用性。
Abstract: As China’s coal mining gradually extends to deeper depths, the prevention and control of water inrush from the floor has become a key issue determining safe mine production. Traditional risk assessment methods for floor water inrush mostly rely on static analyses focusing on single factors such as aquiclude thickness and water pressure. These methods fail to reflect the dynamic deterioration of water-resisting properties of rock strata during mining and can hardly reveal the coupled mechanism with the stress field and seepage field. This paper systematically reviews the existing research in four areas: mechanism of floor water inrush, characterization of water-resisting performance of rock strata, influence of mining-induced effects, and risk assessment methods. Current studies have evolved from empirical judgment based on single factors to a comprehensive assessment system involving multi-field coupled numerical simulation, microseismic monitoring, and machine learning. However, a unified standard for quantitative characterization of rock water-resisting performance has not been established, and the dynamic coupling mechanism between mining-induced effects and water-resisting performance remains incompletely clarified. Future research should focus on establishing an integrated dynamic assessment model of “water-resisting performance, mining-induced damage, seepage evolution”. Combined with intelligent monitoring and early-warning technologies, this will further improve the accuracy and engineering applicability of risk assessment for coal floor water inrush.
文章引用:刘帅康. 工作面底板突水危险性评价研究综述[J]. 矿山工程, 2026, 14(4): 989-998. https://doi.org/10.12677/me.2026.144099

参考文献

[1] 吴焘, 王泽田, 华伟, 等. 承压含水层上完整型煤层底板突水机制模拟[J]. 现代矿业, 2025, 41(11): 162-168.
[2] 范军平, 张靖, 苏怡瑶, 等. 采动作用下构造诱发底板突水机理及微震监测防控研究[J]. 煤炭技术, 2025, 44(10): 171-177.
[3] 卢兴州. 静动载荷作用下巷道底板突水机理及关键致灾因素分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 青岛理工大学, 2025.
[4] 王俊光, 杨松, 马峥, 等. 动力扰动下底板突水前兆特征及危险性评价[J]. 力学学报, 2025, 57(7): 1671-1687.
[5] 刘伟韬, 陈东祺, 杜衍辉, 等. 基于非饱和渗流-应力-损伤耦合模型的煤层底板突水演化及电场响应特征研究[J]. 采矿与岩层控制工程学报, 1-21. 2026-06-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 任正瑞, 连会青, 尹尚先, 等. 基于FAHP-TOPSIS模型的煤层底板突水危险性评价[J]. 中国矿业, 2025, 34(11): 145-153.
[7] 刘江斌, 张仲杰, 李洋, 等. 孔隙-裂隙型耦合底板突水数值模拟模型研究[J]. 煤炭技术, 2025, 44(11): 114-119.
[8] 张雪莲. 煤层底板突水危险性评价及突水防治措施[J]. 煤炭与化工, 2025, 48(2): 65-69+99.
[9] 宋子琦. 潘二矿微震监测与煤层底板突水预警研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2025.
[10] 张世平, 王应政, 苏文, 等. 担水沟煤矿大采高工作面底板突水危险性评价[J]. 内蒙古煤炭经济, 2026(2): 38-40.
[11] 黄刚, 韩云春, 余国锋, 等. 全光纤微震监测技术在底板突水监测中的应用研究[J]. 工矿自动化, 2024, 50(6): 36-45.
[12] 张磊. 新驿煤矿巷道掘进过大落差断层围岩破坏规律及底板突水防控研究[J]. 煤炭科技, 2024, 45(3): 109-116.
[13] 杨鹤鹤, 王欣欣, 赵璐, 等. 潘家窑煤矿8号煤层底板突水性分析[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2025, 37(5): 93-96.
[14] 郝耀军. 西曲矿带压开采煤层底板突水危险性评价[J]. 煤炭与化工, 2025, 48(3): 72-77.
[15] 尹武平. 层次分析法在煤层底板突水评价中的应用研究[J]. 江西煤炭科技, 2024(3): 195-197+201.
[16] 杨茹蕙, 李小萌, 王铁记. 基于IAHP-EWM博弈论的煤层底板突水影响因素研究[J]. 煤炭与化工, 2024, 47(7): 43-47+52.
[17] 郝宪杰, 李航, 赵毅鑫, 等. 基于日累积微震指标与水位关联效应的底板突水预警方法与应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2024, 43(9): 2125-2139.
[18] 张志, 刘进晓. 基于DBO-SVC的煤层底板突水灾害预测[J]. 山东煤炭科技, 2025, 43(5): 168-173.
[19] 李晨曦, 鲁海峰. 基于小样本数据机器学习的煤层底板突水预测[J]. 煤矿安全, 2025, 56(1): 171-179.
[20] 段鑫. 深部煤层底板突水机理与预测方法研究[J]. 煤炭新视界, 2025(1): 108-109.