数字时代休息权重构:从离线自由到算法共治
Rest Weight Reconstruction in the Digital Age: From Offline Freedom to Algorithmic Co-Governance
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2026.157559, PDF,   
作者: 罗世玉:重庆工商大学法学与社会学学院,重庆
关键词: 休息权算法共治离线权The Right to Rest Algorithmic Co-Governance The Right to Disconnect
摘要: 数字经济的蓬勃发展推动平台用工模式深度普及,算法管理的泛化使劳动者休息权陷入时间边界模糊、侵害方式隐蔽、救济路径不畅的三重困境。现有研究围绕休息权的法理基础、平台用工的法律定性及算法规制路径形成多元争议,但仍存在制度设计碎片化、公私法衔接不足的局限。本文以宪法层面的基本权利保障为逻辑起点,重构数字时代休息权时间疆域、自主支配、生活安宁的三维内涵,通过梳理平台用工中休息权保护的四大核心矛盾,借鉴欧盟与美国的差异化规制经验,结合我国用工实践,提出立法基准划定底线、算法共治优化过程、救济衔接保障落地的三维共治路径。研究旨在突破传统劳动法的主体局限,破解算法控制下的休息权侵害难题,为新就业形态劳动者权益保障及劳动法现代化提供理论支撑与实践指引。
Abstract: The vigorous development of the digital economy has led to the widespread popularity of platform employment models. The extensive application of algorithmic management has plunged workers’ right to rest into a triple dilemma: blurred time boundaries, covert infringements and inadequate remedy channels. Existing studies have sparked diverse debates over the legal basis of the right to rest, the legal definition of platform employment and approaches to algorithmic regulation, yet they are still constrained by fragmented institutional design and insufficient coordination between public and private laws. Starting from the protection of fundamental rights stipulated in the Constitution, this paper reconstructs the three-dimensional connotation of the right to rest in the digital age, namely temporal scope, independent disposition and peaceful life. By sorting out four core contradictions in the protection of the right to rest under platform employment, drawing on differentiated regulatory experiences of the EU and the United States, and combining with China’s employment practices, it proposes a three-dimensional collaborative governance path: setting bottom-line norms through legislation, optimizing operational processes via algorithmic co-governance, and ensuring effective implementation through coordinated remedies. This research aims to break through the subject limitations of traditional labor law, address infringements upon the right to rest under algorithmic control, and provide theoretical support and practical guidance for protecting the rights and interests of workers in new forms of employment and promoting the modernization of labor law.
文章引用:罗世玉. 数字时代休息权重构:从离线自由到算法共治[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(7): 165-171. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.157559

参考文献

[1] 梁栋. 平台劳动者过劳问题的法律规制[J]. 地方立法研究, 2023, 8(6): 75-94.
[2] 唐辰明. “已读不回”能否成为权利: 我国构建离线权的冷思考[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2025(11): 51-58.
[3] 李俊. 数字时代劳动者休息权的宪法保障难题[J]. 法学, 2024(12): 64-78.
[4] 蓝寿荣. 论我国宪法休息权的解释[J]. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(4): 45-57.
[5] 艾琳, 于轩. 异化劳动理论视阈下新就业形态中休息权的实现[J]. 江汉论坛, 2024(11): 126-131.
[6] 傅溢. 离线权的再定位与适用进路[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2025(12): 72-83+157.
[7] 戴津伟. 社会加速视域下休息权保护的挑战及应对[J]. 东岳论丛, 2024, 45(6): 174-182.
[8] 吴帅, 石嘉伟, 朱丹雨. 数字时代劳动者权益保护算法治理: 生成逻辑与优化路径[J]. 治理研究, 2024, 40(5): 147-156+160.
[9] 陈龙. “数字控制”下的劳动秩序——外卖骑手的劳动控制研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2020, 35(6): 113-135+244.
[10] 黄镇. 我国劳动领域中的休息权研究——历史、现状与展望[J]. 理论与改革, 2016(1): 135-139.
[11] 谢增毅. 数字化对劳动法的主要挑战及其系统回应[J]. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(9): 102-114.
[12] 葛家欣. 数字时代劳动者离线权保障: 欧盟经验与中国路径[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 35(5): 95-105.
[13] 郑尚元, 傅成. 数智时代劳动者离线权的保护逻辑与现实考量[J]. 社会科学研究, 2025(6): 134-143+222.