AI赋能项目式学习的高中英语整本书阅读教学实践研究——以《Robinson Crusoe》创读课为例
A Practical Study on AI-Empowered Project-Based Learning in Senior High School English Whole-Book Reading Instruction—A Case Study of a Creative Reading Lesson on Robinson Crusoe
摘要: 在教育数字化背景下,高中英语整本书阅读教学正从文本讲解转向任务驱动、资源融合和多元评价协同。本文以高一英语整本书阅读项目《Robinson Crusoe》为课例,借鉴“研究缘起–理论依据–课例分析–教学实施–评价反思”的案例论文结构,围绕“ACCESS”教学模式展开分析。课例以项目式学习为组织形态,以英语学习活动观为路径,以SOLO分类理论和形成性评价为支撑,设计“激趣导读、跨界赏析、创新写作、阅读展演”四个课时,并重点分析创读课中“创、展、评、演、探、拓”六个环节。研究认为,AI技术能够在资料整合、情境创设、语言支架、过程评价和作品展示等方面提升阅读效率,但其价值不在于代替学生阅读和思考,而在于为自主探究、合作建构和迁移创新提供脚手架。同时,结合课例教学设计中“书目调查–任务链推进–六字创读–多元评价”的具体证据,进一步讨论AI工具的局限与学生AI素养培养路径。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of educational digitalization, senior high school English whole-book reading instruction is undergoing a shift from text-centered explanation to task-driven learning, integrated resource use, and coordinated multidimensional assessment. Taking a Grade 10 whole-book reading project on Robinson Crusoe as a case, this paper draws on the case-study framework of “research background, theoretical foundation, lesson analysis, teaching implementation, evaluation and reflection” and conducts an analysis centered on the “ACCESS” teaching model. Organized in the form of project-based learning, guided by the Activity-based Approach to English Learning, and supported by the SOLO taxonomy and formative assessment, the lesson sequence consists of four stages: interest-arousing guided reading, interdisciplinary appreciation, creative writing, and reading performance. Particular attention is given to the creative reading lesson, which is structured around six instructional procedures: creation, presentation, evaluation, performance, inquiry, and extension. The study finds that AI technologies can enhance reading efficiency in areas such as information integration, contextualized scenario construction, language scaffolding, process-based assessment, and multimodal presentation of student work. However, the value of AI does not lie in replacing students’ reading and thinking; rather, it serves as a scaffold for autonomous inquiry, collaborative knowledge construction, and transfer-based creative application. Drawing on concrete evidence from the lesson design, including the book-selection survey, task-chain progression, the six-step creative reading framework, and multidimensional assessment, the paper further discusses the limitations of AI tools and practical pathways for cultivating students’ AI literacy.
文章引用:吴绪甲. AI赋能项目式学习的高中英语整本书阅读教学实践研究——以《Robinson Crusoe》创读课为例[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(7): 1298-1306. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1671500

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高中英语课程标准(2017年版2020年修订) [S]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2020.
[2] 教育部关于印发《教育信息化2.0行动计划》的通知[EB/OL].
https://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/201804/t20180425_334188.html, 2026-07-17.
[3] 国家教育数字化战略行动2025年部署会召开[EB/OL].
https://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_zzjg/huodong/202503/t20250328_1185222.html, 2025-04-07.
[4] Miao, F. and Holmes, W. (2023) Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. UNESCO.
[5] Thomas, J.W. (2000) A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. The Autodesk Foundation.
[6] 王蔷. 普通高中英语课程标准(2017年版)六大变化之解析[J]. 中国外语教育, 2018(2): 11-19.
[7] Biggs, J.B. and Collis, K.F. (1982) Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. Academic Press.
[8] 谭凤兰, 高翔. 高中英语写作课“自主、合作、探究”教学模式构建——以信息技术支持下的高考英语写作真题教学课例为例[J]. 现代教育, 2020(7): 58-60.
[9] 潘澄. 在初中英语阅读课中构建智慧课堂的教学课例分析[J]. 英语广场, 2021(1): 134-136.
[10] 朱国云. 核心素养视域下学生思维品质培养探究——基于英语阅读教学课例分析[J]. 新疆开放大学学报, 2023, 27(1): 39-43.