综合护理干预对初产妇产后抑郁及生活质量的影响研究
Study on the Effect of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention on Postpartum Depression and Quality of Life in Primiparas
摘要: 目的:探讨综合护理干预模式在预防初产妇产后抑郁(PPD)及改善其产后生活质量中的应用效果。方法:选取2023年1月至2024年1月在我院产科分娩的78例初产妇作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组,每组39例。对照组给予产科常规护理,观察组在此基础上实施包括心理疏导、健康教育、社会支持及延续性护理在内的综合护理干预。采用爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)和生活质量综合评定问卷(GQOLI-74)对两组产妇进行评估。结果:干预前两组EPDS评分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);出院后6周,观察组EPDS评分为(8.12 ± 2.15)分,显著低于对照组的(11.45 ± 2.89)分(P < 0.05)。观察组在躯体功能、心理功能、社会功能维度的生活质量评分均显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论:综合护理干预能有效降低初产妇产后抑郁的发生风险,显著提高产妇的心理状态及生活质量,值得在临床推广。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on preventing postpartum depression (PPD) and improving the quality of life in primiparas. Methods: A total of 78 primiparas who delivered in our hospital from January 2023 to January 2024 were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, with 39 cases in each group. The control group received routine obstetric nursing, while the observation group received comprehensive nursing intervention, including psychological counseling, health education, social support, and continuing nursing. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74) were used to evaluate the outcomes. Results: Before intervention, there was no significant difference in EPDS scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). Six weeks after discharge, the EPDS score of the observation group was (8.12 ± 2.15), which was significantly lower than that of the control group (11.45 ± 2.89) (P < 0.05). The scores of physical function, psychological function, and social function in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Comprehensive nursing intervention can effectively reduce the risk of postpartum depression in primiparas and significantly improve their psychological status and quality of life, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
文章引用:赵林林. 综合护理干预对初产妇产后抑郁及生活质量的影响研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(7): 2010-2014. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1672727

参考文献

[1] 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 围产期抑郁症筛查与诊治专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2021, 56(8): 521-527.
[2] 李小玲. 导乐陪伴助产护理模式对产妇分娩结局的影响[J]. 中外女性健康研究, 2020(9): 120, 160.
[3] 李娜, 张岚, 芮子容, 等. 以家庭为中心的产科护理模式在预防产后抑郁症中的应用研究进展[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2024, 24(7): 575-580.
[4] 刘嫣, 齐伟静, 胡洁. 人际心理疗法对产后抑郁症干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(27): 3317-3322.
[5] Shorey, S., Chee, C.Y.I., Ng, E.D., Chan, Y.H., Tam, W.W.S. and Chong, Y.S. (2018) Prevalence and Incidence of Postpartum Depression among Healthy Mothers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 104, 235-248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 杨雪英, 郭足森. 产前教育在降低产妇产后抑郁症发生率中的应用效果分析[J]. 实用中西医结合临床, 2014, 14(11): 85-86.
[7] 朱榕芳, 谢堃, 苏敏. 心理暗示疗法结合配偶支持对剖宫产产后抑郁产妇的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2022, 28(20): 137-139.
[8] 张彦, 嵇秀明, 蒋玲, 余伟. 基于微信小程序的信息支持对初产妇配偶知觉压力及育儿胜任感的影响效果研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2024, 53(20): 3191-3195.