“双减”背景下家校合作的困境与出路：基于社会资本理论视角的分析
Dilemmas and Solutions of Home-School Cooperation under the “Double Reduction” Policy: An Analysis from the Perspective of Social Capital Theory
摘要: “双减”政策的实施为深化家校合作、构建育人共同体提供了制度支撑，但当前的家校合作实践仍面临诸多困境。文章引入社会资本理论的分析框架，从结构、关系、认知三个维度剖析了家校合作的现实障碍，揭示出当前家校合作的困境本质上是社会资本生成不足的系统性表现。三个维度的困境相互交织、彼此强化，共同构成了家校合作的现实障碍。基于此，提出应从扩展结构、巩固信任、凝聚共识三个层面同步发力，构建社会资本从生成、维持到深化的良性循环，推动家校合作向纵深发展。
Abstract: The implementation of the “Double Reduction” policy provides institutional support for deepening home-school cooperation and building a community of collaborative education. However, current practices of home-school cooperation still face numerous dilemmas. This paper introduces the analytical framework of social capital theory to dissect the practical obstacles of home-school cooperation from three dimensions: structural, relational, and cognitive. It reveals that the dilemmas of home-school cooperation are essentially a systemic manifestation of insufficient social capital formation. The dilemmas in the three dimensions are interwoven and mutually reinforcing, jointly constituting the practical barriers to home-school cooperation. Accordingly, this paper proposes that efforts should be made simultaneously in three aspects: expanding the structure, consolidating trust, and building consensus, so as to construct a virtuous cycle of social capital from formation, maintenance to deepening, and promote the in-depth development of home-school cooperation.
文章引用：王一如. “双减”背景下家校合作的困境与出路：基于社会资本理论视角的分析[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(7): 248-255. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.157570

参考文献

[1] 中共中央办公厅 国务院办公厅印发《关于进一步减轻义务教育阶段学生 作业负担和校外培训负担的意见》[EB/OL]. 2021-07-24.
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-07/24/content_5627132.htm, 2026-05-25.
[2] 朱永新. 我国家校共育的问题及对策[J]. 教育研究, 2021, 42(1): 15-19.
[3] 柴江. 家校合作的本质属性、困境根源与破解思路[J]. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2021(3): 62-72.
[4] 张俊, 吴重涵, 王梅雾, 等. 面向实践的家校合作指导理论——交叠影响域理论综述[J]. 教育学术月刊, 2019(5): 3-12.
[5] 龙宝新, 李海英. “双减”背景下家校共育思维的转变与落地[J]. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 10(3): 29-37.
[6] 顾理澜, 李刚, 张生, 等. “双减”背景下数字化赋能家校社协同育人研究[J]. 中国远程教育, 2022(4): 10-17.
[7] 吴重涵, 张俊, 王梅雾. 是什么阻碍了家长对子女教育的参与——阶层差异、学校选择性抑制与家长参与[J]. 教育研究, 2017, 38(1): 85-94.
[8] 张阳阳, 戴艺伟. 教育竞争、家校联系与教育不平等——以围绕家庭作业的家校互动为例[J]. 社会学评论, 2024, 12(1): 48-71.
[9] 李晓晗, 郑磊. 社会资本起作用吗?——农村家庭的代际闭合与儿童学业表现[J]. 教育学报, 2016, 12(3): 45-53.
[10] Lin, N. (2002) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Vol. 19, Cambridge University Press.
[11] 王卫东. 中国城市居民的社会网络资本与个人资本[J]. 社会学研究, 2006(3): 151-166+245.
[12] Putnam, R.D., Nanetti, R.Y. and Leonardi, R. (1994) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press, 1-280.
[13] Arneil, B. (2006) Civic Trust and Shared Norms. In: Diverse Communities: The Problem with Social Capital, Cambridge University Press, 124-162.
[14] Curșeu, P.L., Muntean, A.F. and Tucaliuc, M. (2025) “It All Comes Down to the Teens”: An Actor-Partner-Interdependence Model of Trust, Engagement and Satisfaction with the School in Parent-Adolescent Dyads. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 21, 366-377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Bormann, I., Killus, D., Niedlich, S. and Würbel, I. (2021) Home-School Interaction: A Vignette Study of Parents’ Views on Situations Relevant to Trust. European Education, 53, 137-151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998) Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] Anazia, I.U., Skinner, B. and Woods, C. (2025) Home-School Partnerships: Values and Expectations of Rural Teachers and Parents. Educational Research, 67, 170-189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Coleman, J.S. (1988) Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] 刘倩, 程天君. “双减”政策施行的结构困境及其纾解——基于城市家庭参与教育改革的案例分析[J]. 中国远程教育, 2023, 43(9): 28-37+55.
[20] 边玉芳, 周欣然. 家校互动不良的原因分析与对策研究[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2019(11): 39-44.
[21] 何嘉丽. “双减”背景下家校社“三位一体”协同育人机制探究[J]. 天津科技, 2024, 51(6): 80-82+86.
[22] 宋谋春. “双减”之下, 一台打印机的“囧途”与教育“内耗” [EB/OL]. 2025-12-02.
https://www.gxnews.com.cn/staticpages/20251202/newgx692eb970-21877632.shtml, 2026-05-25.
[23] 教育部等十七部门联合印发《家校社协同育人“教联体”工作方案》[EB/OL]. 2024-11-01.
http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202411/t20241101_1160204.html, 2026-05-25.
[24] 中共北京市委教育科技人才工作领导小组关于印发《关于促进中小学生身心健康发展的若干意见》的通知[EB/OL]. 2025-05-15.
https://jw.beijing.gov.cn/xxgk/2024zcwj/2024qtwj/202505/t20250515_4089822.html, 2026-05-25.
[25] 山东省教育厅等4部门关于印发中小学幼儿园推进全环境立德树人工作方案的通知[EB/OL]. 2023-04-10.
http://edu.shandong.gov.cn/art/2023/4/10/art_107055_10312424.html?xxgkhide=1, 2026-05-25.
[26] 荆洲, 梁祖连, 杨启光. 破局家校社协同困境: 数字教联体的技术治理机制解析——基于“技术-组织-环境”框架的多案例分析[J]. 中国电化教育, 2025(9): 28-35+62.
[27] 田友谊, 李婧玮. 互动仪式链理论视角下家校合作的困境与破解[J]. 中国电化教育, 2022(7): 97-103+114.
[28] 韩金彪. 河北献县: 构建家校社协同育人的“献县创新模式” [EB/OL]. 2025-12-26.
https://www.zxxbzr.cn/h-nd-5097.html, 2026-05-25.
[29] 魏海政. 山东建协同育人“生态圈”, 实现市县“教联体”建设全覆盖 家校社携手共绘成长“同心圆” [N/OL]. 中国教育报, 2025-12-03(1).
http://edu.shandong.gov.cn/art/2025/12/3/art_11975_10343938.html, 2026-05-25.
[30] 岳伟, 余乐. 从“权责博弈”到“均衡相容”: “双减”政策下家校协同育人的再思考[J]. 教育学术月刊, 2023(9): 90-96.
[31] 余勇. 作业设计共同体: 家校社协同育人的创新路径[J]. 中国德育, 2024(12): 69-71.
[32] 王羽. 家长, 不做看客的师生发展助力者——北京师范大学贵阳附属小学家校共育实践案例[J]. 中国教师, 2019(8): 36-38.

为你推荐