汉语“兔”字成语的隐喻研究
A Study on the Metaphorical Usage of the Chinese Character “Rabbit” in Idioms
摘要: 针对“兔”字成语隐喻类型与认知机制缺乏系统分析的问题,本文以46个“兔”字成语为研究对象,采用文献研究法、功能分析法,从认知语言学视角考察其隐喻类型与运作机制。研究发现:“兔”字成语的隐喻义褒贬兼具,整体以褒义为主,可映射至人体、时间、环境、心理、事态等多个目标域;其运作机制以跨域映射、相似性联想和认知语境为核心。本研究旨在为汉语动物隐喻的历时演变研究提供语料支持。
Abstract: In response to the lack of systematic analysis on the types and cognitive mechanisms of metaphors in idioms containing the character “rabbit”, this paper focuses on 46 “rabbit” idioms as research subjects. Using literature review, functional analysis, it examines their metaphorical types and operational mechanisms from the perspective of cognitive linguistics. The study finds that the metaphorical meanings of “rabbit” idioms encompass both positive and negative evaluations, with an overall predominance of positive meanings. These metaphors can be mapped onto multiple target domains, including the human body, time, environment, psychology, and events. Their operational mechanisms revolve around cross-domain mapping, similarity-based association, and cognitive context. This study aims to provide corpus support for the diachronic study of animal metaphors in Chinese.
文章引用:罗本丽. 汉语“兔”字成语的隐喻研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(7): 763-769. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.147702

参考文献

[1] 莱考夫, 约翰逊. 我们赖以生存的隐喻[M]. 何文忠, 译. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2015: 18-23.
[2] 束定芳. 隐喻学研究[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2000.
[3] 林书武. 隐喻研究的基本现状、焦点及趋势[J]. 外国语, 2002(1): 38-45.
[4] 胡壮麟. 认知隐喻学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2004.
[5] 黄洁. 扩展概念隐喻理论与汉语隐喻研究[J]. 当代语言学, 2024, 26(1): 99-115.
[6] 陈川洪, 文旭. 概念隐喻的多层级性及其文化认知理据——以汉英语中“火/FIRE”隐喻为例[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2025, 57(4): 511-522.
[7] (美)乔治·莱考夫, 马克·约翰逊. 我们赖以生存的隐喻[M]. 何文忠, 译. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2015.
[8] 张再红. 词汇文化语义的认知研究[M]. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2010: 67-70.
[9] 王文斌. 隐喻的认知建构和解读[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2007: 37.
[10] 束定芳. 论隐喻的运作机制[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2002(2): 98-106+160.
[11] 宋孙苗. “虎”字成语的隐喻机制[J]. 科教导刊(中旬刊), 2010(14): 175-176.