在职高中英语教师写作评价素养现状调查
A Survey of In-Service Senior High School English Teachers’ Writing Assessment Literacy
摘要: 本研究以浙江、山西、陕西、天津四省市81名高中英语教师为对象,采用问卷和访谈调查其写作评价素养现状及影响因素。结果显示,教师写作评价素养总体处于中等偏上水平,但个体差异显著;教师在评价观念上已形成基本共识,而在评价知识的系统性与实践转化能力方面存在明显短板。进一步分析显示,教师写作评价素养在学历、职称、学校类型等变量上存在显著差异,性别对其无显著影响。鉴于上述研究结果,建议教师通过多元路径提升自身写作评价素养,以增强评价科学性、公正性,助力教师成长。
Abstract: This study surveyed 81 senior high school English teachers from Zhejiang, Shanxi, Shaanxi, and Tianjin using questionnaires and interviews to examine their writing assessment literacy and its influencing factors. The results indicate that teachers’ writing assessment literacy is generally above the intermediate level, though with significant individual differences. Teachers have reached a basic consensus on assessment concepts, yet exhibit notable deficiencies in the systematicity of assessment knowledge and the ability to translate knowledge into practice. Further analysis reveals significant differences in writing assessment literacy across variables such as educational background, professional title, and school type, whereas gender shows no significant effect. Based on these findings, it is recommended that teachers enhance their writing assessment literacy through multiple pathways to improve the scientific rigor and fairness of assessment, thereby facilitating teacher professional development.
文章引用:沈愉婷. 在职高中英语教师写作评价素养现状调查[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(7): 1495-1503. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1671524

参考文献

[1] 中华人名共和国教育部. 普通高中英语课程标准(2017年版2025年修订) [S]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2025.
[2] Lee, I. (2017) Classroom Writing Assessment and Feedback in L2 School Contexts. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
[3] Crusan, D., Plakans, L. and Gebril, A. (2016) Writing Assessment Literacy: Surveying Second Language Teachers’ Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices. Assessing Writing, 28, 43-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Lam, R. (2019) Teacher Assessment Literacy: Surveying Knowledge, Conceptions and Practices of Classroom-Based Writing Assessment in China. System, 81, 78-89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Thirakunkovit, S. and Thirakunkovit, P. (2019) Exploring Writing Assessment Literacy and Classroom Practices of Thai University Instructors. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 16, 1135-1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Valizadeh, M. (2019) EFL Teachers’ Writing Assessment Literacy, Beliefs, and Training Needs in the Context of Turkey. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Tayyebi, M., Abbasabady, M.M. and Abbassian, G. (2022) Examining Classroom Writing Assessment Literacy: A Focus on In-Service EFL Teachers in Iran. Language Testing in Asia, 12, Article No. 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 王少非. 教师评价素养的发展建议[J]. 课程教材教学研究(小教研究), 2008(Z6): 49.
[9] 林敦来, 高淼. 教师评估素养: 理论与实践[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2011(4): 29-37.
[10] 孟亚茹, 崔雨. 外语教师混合式教学形成性评价素养与发展路径研究[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2023(5): 86-98+147-148.
[11] 谢耀晶. 新时代高校英语教师语言评价素养现状调查与启示——以广西某应用型本科院校为例[J]. 现代英语, 2025(17): 84-87.
[12] 张琳涛, 杨鲁新. 高中英语教师写作评价素养现状的个案研究[J]. 外语教育研究前沿, 2023, 6(3): 64-72+96.
[13] 陶莉. 高中英语教师评价素养对学生写作成就的影响研究——以重庆市西南大学附属中学为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2020.
[14] 陈向明. 质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2020.
[15] 王蔷, 李亮. 推动核心素养背景下英语课堂教-学-评一体化: 意义、理论与方法[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2019, 39(5): 114-120.
[16] Ohta, R., Plakans, L.M. and Gebril, A. (2018) Integrated Writing Scores Based on Holistic and Multi-Trait Scales: A Generalizability Analysis. Assessing Writing, 38, 21-36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef