数字文明发展困境与本土实践思考
Dilemmas in the Development of Digital Civilization and Reflections on Local Chinese Practices
DOI: 10.12677/isl.2026.104124, PDF,   
作者: 薛子涵:西安交通大学马克思主义学院,陕西 西安
关键词: 数字资本主义中国式数字文明数字治理Digital Capitalism Chinese-Style Digital Civilization Digital Governance
摘要: 数字技术的持续迭代重塑了社会生产方式与治理形态,推动人类文明迈入数字化演进新阶段。数字资本作为数字生产力发展的重要市场形态,已成为全球数字经济运行的重要载体。在资本逐利逻辑与技术工具属性相互交织的过程中,数字化发展伴随系列阶段性、结构性矛盾,构成当前全球数字文明建设需要共同应对的治理难题。从马克思主义政治经济学视角来看,数字时代资本积累方式的革新,重塑了技术、资本与社会的互动关系,亦容易引发多重现实问题。本文以马克思主义政治经济学为分析框架,梳理数字文明生成逻辑,辩证剖析全球数字化进程中的结构矛盾,并立足我国以人民为中心的发展立场,阐释中国式数字文明建设的制度优势与实践路径,通过制度规范引导数字资本良性发展,统筹数字经济创新发展与社会公共价值建设,探索适配中国国情、兼顾效率与公平的发展模式,为全球数字治理与数字文明良性演进提供多元实践参考。
Abstract: The continuous iteration of digital technologies has reshaped the modes of social production and governance, ushering human civilization into a new phase of digital evolution. As a key market form of digital productive forces, digital capital has become a major carrier underpinning the operation of the global digital economy. The entanglement between the profit-driven logic of capital and the instrumental nature of technology has spawned a host of periodic and structural contradictions in digital development, which pose shared governance challenges to the construction of global digital civilization. From the perspective of Marxist political economy, the transformation of capital accumulation patterns in the digital age has restructured the interactions between technology, capital and society, thereby triggering a range of real-world problems. Taking Marxist political economy as the analytical framework, this paper combs the generative logic of digital civilization and dialectically examines structural contradictions emerging in the global digital transformation. Rooted in China’s people-centered development philosophy, it elaborates on the institutional advantages and practical approaches to building Chinese-style digital civilization. By regulating digital capital via institutional arrangements, we coordinate the innovative growth of the digital economy with the cultivation of social public values, and explore a development model tailored to China’s national conditions that balances efficiency and equity. This research offers diverse practical experience for global digital governance and the sound progression of digital civilization worldwide.
文章引用:薛子涵. 数字文明发展困境与本土实践思考[J]. 交叉科学快报, 2026, 10(4): 1054-1061. https://doi.org/10.12677/isl.2026.104124

参考文献

[1] 提升全民数字素养与技能行动纲要[EB/OL]. 2021-11-05.
https://www.cac.gov.cn/2021-11/05/c_1637708867754305.htm, 2026-06-17.
[2] 董金平. 加速主义与数字平台——斯尔尼塞克的平台资本主义批判[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 35(6): 55-65.
[3] 徐宏潇. 国际数字资本主义的发展动向及其内在悖论[J]. 经济学家, 2020(2): 54-60.
[4] Zuboff, S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.
[5] Zuboff, S. (2022) Surveillance Capitalism or Democracy? The Death Match of Institutional Orders and the Politics of Knowledge in Our Information Civilization. Organization Theory, 3.
[6] 马克思恩格斯选集(第3卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012.
[7] 孔令全, 黄再胜. 马克思劳动价值论之数字经济时代拓展——西方资本主义社会数字劳动价值创造研究[J]. 广东行政学院学报, 2018, 30(2): 14-21.
[8] 王淼, 向东旭. 数字资本逻辑批判的四重维度[J]. 经济学家, 2022(1): 36-44.
[9] 邓佳. 数字文明主体性的理论审视[J]. 马克思主义研究, 2025(10): 134-144.
[10] 景池, 冯明宇. 数字生态文明: 当代出场、内涵面相与实践展陈[J]. 北方民族大学学报, 2025(2): 123-132.
[11] Srnicek, N. (2015) Inventing the Future: PostCapitalism and a World without Work. Verso Books.
[12] Morozov, E. (2011) The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. PublicAffairs.