生存悬置:农村留守青少年社会联结缺失与修复机制研究
Existential Suspension: A Study on Social Connectedness Deficiency and Repair Mechanisms among Rural Left-Behind Adolescents
摘要: 城镇化进程中,农村劳动力大规模向城市转移催生了数量庞大的农村留守青少年群体。本研究以云南省保山市M村12~16岁初高中留守青少年为研究对象,通过田野调查与文献梳理,剖析其“生存悬置”困境的现实图景、生成逻辑及社会联结修复路径。其“生存悬置”状态的形成,根源于人口流动与产业调整驱动的成长环境变迁、代际间成长秩序断裂引发的重构困境,以及价值认同危机与行为选择的迷茫失范的叠加。研究认为,需从强化内在发展能力、重塑亲子愈合纽带、促进同伴联结增生、构建社区支持网络及优化乡村产业结构五个维度协同发力,形成政府、家庭、学校、社区多方联动的系统性治理路径,从而为完善农村留守青少年关爱服务体系、激活乡村人才振兴内生动力提供学理参考与实践启示。
Abstract: Amid rapid urbanization, the large-scale transfer of rural labor to cities has generated a substantial population of left-behind adolescents in rural areas. This study focuses on left-behind adolescents aged 12~16 attending junior and senior high schools in M Village, Baoshan City, Yunnan Province. Through fieldwork and literature review, it examines the realistic manifestations, generative logic, and social connectedness repair pathways of their “existential suspension” predicament. The formation of this existential suspension is rooted in the convergence of three intertwined factors: environmental changes driven by population mobility and industrial restructuring, reconstruction dilemmas triggered by the rupture of intergenerational growth orders, and identity crises compounded by anomic behavioral choices. The study contends that systematic governance, involving coordinated efforts across five dimensions—strengthening intrinsic developmental capacities, reshaping parent-child bonding, fostering peer connectedness, building community support networks, and optimizing rural industrial structures—is essential to address this issue. Such a multi-stakeholder approach, engaging government, families, schools, and communities, can offer both theoretical insights and practical implications for improving the care service system for rural left-behind adolescents and for unlocking the endogenous momentum of rural talent revitalization.
文章引用:徐翡. 生存悬置:农村留守青少年社会联结缺失与修复机制研究[J]. 交叉科学快报, 2026, 10(4): 1062-1070. https://doi.org/10.12677/isl.2026.104125

参考文献

[1] Cen, W.-C., Liang, J., Zhang, X.-H., Yan, W.-J. and Qian, J. (2025) The Influence of Left-Behind Experiences on Depression in Single-Parent Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Family Satisfaction and the Moderating Effects of Exercise Frequency. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 13, Article ID: 1573630.
[2] Zhang, D., Gao, N., Liu, X. and Wang, Y. (2025) Childhood Emotional Trauma and Social Avoidance and Distress in Adolescents: Psychological Resilience as Mediator and Left-Behind Experience as Moderator. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article ID: 1578809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Xie, H., Shlonsky, A., Jiang, Y. and Cui, K. (2024) Cyber Victimization, Traditional Victimization, and Suicidal Ideation: The Role of Left-Behind Status among Adolescents in Rural China. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 42, 851-862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Gao, F., Miao, M., Yao, Y., Ji, Z., Xiong, Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2025) Relationship between Family Functioning and Problem Behaviors of Left-Behind Adolescents in China. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 34, 1746-1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 鲁汉杰. 农村留守青少年存在的问题与对策[J]. 商, 2015(46): 109-110.
[6] 张艺涵, 张婷, 赵景欣. 歧视知觉与农村留守青少年的孤独感: 亲子分离年龄和分离时长的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 90-99.
[7] 罗印师. 农村隔代教育留守青少年自我认同提升的个案介入: 以W村小D为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西宁: 青海师范大学, 2022.
[8] 徐明津, 杨新国. 农村留守青少年家庭经济困难与社会适应: 心理韧性的中介效应[J]. 青少年研究与实践, 2020, 35(1): 22-28+93.
[9] 王建英, 王婷, 程晓宇. 父母返乡回流对农村留守青少年心理健康的影响[J]. 农业技术经济, 2025(9): 124-144.
[10] 王晓清. 认知行为疗法介入农村留守青少年校园欺凌行为矫正的个案研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2024.
[11] 王兰. 农村留守青少年行为失范的分析与对策[J]. 法制与社会, 2015(25): 171-172.
[12] 汪泽明. 农村留守青少年累积生态风险类别及其与自杀意念的关系: 有调节的链式中介模型[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2023.
[13] 查梦元, 徐敏丽. 农村留守青少年未来就业保障及其影响[J]. 合作经济与科技, 2017(13): 186-189.
[14] 李桂, 刘燕群, 扈菊英. 农村留守青少年的性心理现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国性科学, 2017, 26(8): 146-150.
[15] 王玉香. 农村留守青少年校园欺凌问题的质性研究[J]. 中国青年研究, 2016(12): 63-68.
[16] 毕德旭. 农村留守青少年行为失范的表现及对策[J]. 法制博览, 2019(7): 49-50.
[17] 苏振甲. 理解的开端问题: 论胡塞尔现象学中“悬置”的意义[J]. 理论界, 2025(7): 58-64.
[18] 胡塞尔. 纯粹现象学通论[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2017.
[19] 涂尔干. 社会分工论[M]. 上海: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2024.
[20] 丁开杰. “社会排斥”概念: 语义考察和话语转换[J]. 晋阳学刊, 2009(1): 52-57.
[21] 朱映雪. 被忽视的贫困群体: 农村留守青少年多维贫困的现状与对策研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2020.
[22] 刘媛. 亲子分离与留守青少年抑郁情绪的发展轨迹: 友谊质量的作用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东师范大学, 2022.
[23] 赵阔, 陈俊成. “学不好”还是“不学好”: 农村留守青少年“混”的多重表现与改善路径[J]. 中国青年研究, 2026(5): 62-72+119.
[24] Krauss, S., Orth, U. and Robins, R.W. (2020) Family Environment and Self-Esteem Development: A Longitudinal Study from Age 10 to 16. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119, 457-478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Birkeland, M.S., Breivik, K. and Wold, B. (2014) Peer Acceptance Protectsglobal Self-Esteem from Negative Eeffects of Low Closness Toparents during Adolescence and Early Adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 70-80.
[26] 周燕. 如何预防留守青少年校园欺凌[J]. 甘肃教育, 2020(1): 25.