新工科背景下以学习为中心的《数学物理方程》教学范式改革研究
Research on the Reform of the Learning-Centered Teaching Paradigm for “Mathematical Physics Equations” in the Context of New Engineering Education
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.1671538, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 胥德平, 李进东*:成都理工大学数学科学学院,四川 成都
关键词: 新工科以学习为中心教学改革分层教学过程性评价New Engineering Education Student-Centered Teaching Reform Hierarchical Teaching Process Evaluation
摘要: 《数学物理方程》是石油、地质、勘探等工科专业的核心基础课程,课程内容兼具理论抽象性与工程应用性,对学生数学功底与逻辑思维要求较高。在长期一线教学中发现,课程普遍存在教学设计固化、教学内容与专业需求贴合度不足、学生学习分层差异大、自主学习过程缺少有效监管等实际问题。为切实提升课堂教学质量,真正落实“以学习为中心”的教学理念,本文立足本校工科专业办学特色,从课堂教学设计优化、分专业差异化教学、分层自主学习引导、全过程多元考核四个维度开展教学范式改革。结合分离变量法、积分变换等核心知识点的课堂实践,融入任务驱动、软件辅助教学与小组探究模式,探索适合新工科培养目标的课堂教学新路径。教学实践表明,改革能够有效化解课程难点、缩小学情差距、强化知识应用能力,切实推动课堂从“教师讲授”向“学生深度学习”转变,可为同类工科数理课程教学优化提供实践参考。
Abstract: “Mathematical Physical Equations” is a core foundational course for engineering majors such as petroleum, geology, and exploration. The course content combines theoretical abstraction with engineering application, and requires students to have a high level of mathematical foundation and logical thinking. In long-term frontline teaching, it has been found that courses generally have practical problems such as rigid teaching design, insufficient alignment between teaching content and professional needs, significant differences in student learning stratification, and lack of effective supervision in the process of self-directed learning. In order to effectively improve the quality of classroom teaching and truly implement the teaching philosophy of “learning-centered”, this article is based on the characteristics of our university’s engineering majors, and carries out teaching paradigm reform from four dimensions: optimizing classroom teaching design, differentiated teaching by major, guiding self-directed learning at different levels, and conducting diversified assessments throughout the entire process. Combining core knowledge points such as variable separation method and integral transformation with classroom practice, integrating task-driven, software-assisted teaching, and group exploration mode, it explores new classroom teaching paths that are suitable for the training objectives of new engineering education. Teaching practice has shown that reform can effectively resolve curriculum difficulties, narrow the gap in learning situations, strengthen knowledge application abilities, and effectively promote the transformation of the classroom from “teacher lectures” to “student deep learning”. It can provide practical references for optimizing the teaching of similar engineering mathematics and physics courses.
文章引用:胥德平, 李进东. 新工科背景下以学习为中心的《数学物理方程》教学范式改革研究[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(7): 1604-1609. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1671538

参考文献

[1] 吴爱华, 侯永峰, 杨秋波. 新工科建设与工程教育改革发展路径探析[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2019(1): 1-7.
[2] 陈芳, 邵汉民. “学为中心”的课堂教学模式实践探讨[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2020, 40(17): 50-52.
[3] 郑应生, 涂亚庆, 何滔, 等. “学为中心”课堂教学质量提升策略研究[J]. 高等教育研究学报, 2023, 46(1): 117-120.
[4] 刘湉祎, 李立国. 覆盖学习全过程: “以学习为中心”评价的趋势[J]. 中国大学教学, 2020(5): 68-74.
[5] 蔡井伟, 史新和. 以学习为中心的教学范式改革研究——以金融工程专业高等数学教学为例[J]. 科技风, 2024(18): 111-113.
[6] 王元明. 数学物理方程与特殊函数[M]. 第5版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2019.
[7] 张奠宙. 数学教育学导论[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003.
[8] 李海侠, 何俊红, 王钟斐. “以学生为中心, 以需求为导向”的高等数学课程教学实践研究[J]. 科技风, 2024(7): 109-111.
[9] 李曦, 李波. 新工科背景下大学数学课程教学模式的研究与实践[J]. 南昌航空大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 36(4): 134-138.