基于AHP的地热开发模式评价指标体系构建及权重分析
Construction of Evaluation Index System and Weight Analysis for Geothermal Development Models Based on AHP
摘要: 为提高地热开发模式选择的科学性,研究旨在构建一套全面、可量化的地热开发模式评价指标体系。研究采用层次分析法(AHP),搭建包含目标层、准则层、指标层的三层评价框架,筛选18项核心指标构建评价体系,采用软件模拟5位行业专家构建判断矩阵,经矩阵集成与一致性检验,完成各层级指标权重赋值与定量分析。结果表明,项目投资(26.94%)、地质工程风险(14.68%)、政策支持力度(8.57%)、经济成本风险(8.07%)、投资回收期(7.77%)是地热开发决策的关键影响因素,模式选择应关注高权重指标以提高开发模式综合得分。本文构建的评价体系可为地热项目立项决策、方案优化及风险管控提供量化支撑,对推动地热产业高质量发展、助力“双碳”目标实现具有理论价值与实践意义。
Abstract: To enhance the scientific basis for selecting geothermal development models, this study aims to establish a comprehensive and quantifiable evaluation indicator system. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a three-tier evaluation framework comprising objective, criterion, and indicator layers was constructed. Eighteen core indicators were selected to form the evaluation system. Judgment matrices were simulated using software based on input from five industry experts. Through matrix integration and consistency testing, weights were assigned to indicators at each level, enabling quantitative analysis. Results show that project investment (26.94%), geological engineering risk (14.68%), policy support intensity (8.57%), economic cost risk (8.07%), and payback period (7.77%) are key influencing factors in geothermal development decisions. Model selection should prioritize high-weight indicators to improve overall performance scores. The developed evaluation system provides quantitative support for project initiation, scheme optimization, and risk management, offering both theoretical value and practical significance for promoting high-quality development of the geothermal industry and advancing the achievement of “dual carbon” goals.
文章引用:麻洪松. 基于AHP的地热开发模式评价指标体系构建及权重分析[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2026, 16(7): 1085-1098. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2026.167097

参考文献

[1] 周博睿. 我国地热能开发利用现状与未来趋势[J]. 能源, 2022(2): 77-80.
[2] 袁潮, 黄少鹏, 魏正安, 等. 广东惠州惠热-1井地热资源经济性评价与开发模式优选[J]. 深圳大学学报(理工版), 2025, 42(6): 631-640.
[3] 王社教, 施亦做, 方朝合, 等. 中国油田地热开发利用现状与发展方向[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 23-32.
[4] 贺志铎. 我国地热产业发展现状与“十五五”发展路径研究[J]. 石油石化绿色低碳, 2026, 11(1): 66-73.
[5] Shi, W., Xu, Z., Chen, G., Feng, B., Wang, M., Song, F., et al. (2025) Mining Geothermal Energy by Electrically Enhanced Geothermal System (EEGS): A New Development Model of Hot Dry Rock. Energy, 337, Article ID: 138599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Saaty, T.L. (1977) A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234-281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 何东博, 任路, 郝杰, 等. 基于层次分析法的地热资源评价体系研究——以河北省曹妃甸地区中深层水热型砂岩储层为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 713-725, 740.
[8] 许天福, 陈敬宜, 冯波, 等. 地热资源开发过程中潜在地下水环境问题[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1149-1162.
[9] 荆克尧. 地热开发项目经济评价方法研究[J]. 石油化工技术与经济, 2021, 37(4): 20-23.
[10] 丁明. 中深层地热供暖项目经济评价研究[J]. 中国总会计师, 2025(9): 135-137.
[11] 《中国河湖大典》编纂委员会. 中国河湖大典[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2014: 1-410.
[12] 孙焕泉, 毛翔, 吴陈冰洁, 等. 地热资源勘探开发技术与发展方向[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(1): 400-411.
[13] 葛伟丽, 张春明, 高娟娟. 我国地热资源开发利用现状及展望[J]. 内蒙古科技与经济, 2025(8): 132-135.
[14] 谌洋. 我国地热能高质量开发利用面临的问题及对策建议[J]. 水电与新能源, 2025, 39(5): 1-4.
[15] Witter, J.B., Trainor-Guitton, W.J. and Siler, D.L. (2019) Uncertainty and Risk Evaluation during the Exploration Stage of Geothermal Development: A Review. Geothermics, 78, 233-242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Borzoni, M., Rizzi, F. and Frey, M. (2014) Geothermal Power in Italy: A Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation. Renewable Energy, 69, 60-73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Bilić, T., Raos, S., Ilak, P., Rajšl, I. and Pašičko, R. (2020) Assessment of Geothermal Fields in the South Pannonian Basin System Using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tool. Energies, 13, Article 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Meng, F., Liang, X., Xiao, C. and Wang, G. (2021) Geothermal Resource Potential Assessment Utilizing GIS-Based Multi Criteria Decision Analysis Method. Geothermics, 89, Article ID: 101969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 王卓卓. 中深层水热型地热资源环境承载力评价系统及建立方法[J]. 城市地质, 2021, 16(2): 147-155.