用户信息自愿披露的影响因素研究:基于沟通隐私管理视角
Research on the Influencing Factors of Voluntary Disclosure of User Information: Based on the Perspective of Communication Privacy Management
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.157821, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 卢晨皓:江苏大学管理学院,江苏 镇江
关键词: 自愿性披露沟通隐私管理用户信息隐私悖论Voluntary Disclosure Communication Privacy Management User Information Privacy Paradox
摘要: 本研究探析了用户信息自愿披露的影响因素及其作用机理,为平台激励用户进行信息披露,以及平台完善个性化推送服务体系提供理论指导。基于沟通隐私管理理论,以感知信息控制和感知信息风险为中介变量、信息使用透明度为调节变量,本文构建了信息踪迹易得、信息边界模糊对用户信息自愿性披露选择的影响结构方程模型,运用SPSS和AMOS,并结合收集到的322份实证数据进行模型检验。本研究发现信息边界模糊、信息踪迹易得通过削弱感知信息控制、增加感知信息风险抑制了用户的信息自愿性披露选择;信息使用透明度正向调节感知信息控制对信息自愿性披露选择的影响、负向调节感知信息风险对信息自愿性披露选择的影响;信息使用透明度调节感知信息控制通过感知信息风险影响信息自愿性披露选择的中介作用。本文提出的“用户信息自愿性披露选择”相对于平台“强行”获取用户数据的情形而言,刻画了用户拥有自主选择权时的信息自愿性披露选择行为。
Abstract: This study explores the influencing factors and mechanisms of voluntary disclosure of user information, providing theoretical guidance for platforms to incentivize users to disclose information and improve personalized push service systems. Based on the theory of communication privacy management, with perceived information control and perceived information risk as mediating variables and information use transparency as moderating variables, this paper constructs a structural equation model of the impact of easily accessible information traces and fuzzy information boundaries on users’ voluntary disclosure choices. SPSS and AMOS are used, and the model is tested with 322 collected empirical data. This study found that blurred information boundaries and easy access to information traces suppress users’ voluntary disclosure choices by weakening perceived information control and increasing perceived information risks; The transparency of information use positively moderates the impact of perceived information control on voluntary disclosure choices, and negatively moderates the impact of perceived information risk on voluntary disclosure choices; The mediating role of information use transparency in regulating perceived information control and influencing voluntary disclosure choices through perceived information risk. The “voluntary disclosure choice of user information” proposed in this article characterizes the voluntary disclosure choice behavior of users when they have the right to make their own choices, compared to the situation where the platform forcibly obtains user data.
文章引用:卢晨皓. 用户信息自愿披露的影响因素研究:基于沟通隐私管理视角[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(7): 799-814. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.157821

参考文献

[1] 张宇东, 张会龙, 张初兵, 等. 社交网络服务中用户隐私关注驱动要素构成与隐私悖论形成机制[J]. 管理学报, 2022, 19(7): 1046-1055.
[2] 彭兰. 假象、算法囚徒与权利让渡: 数据与算法时代的新风险[J]. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 2018, 55(5): 20-29.
[3] Petronio, S. and Child, J.T. (2020) Conceptualization and Operationalization: Utility of Communication Privacy Management Theory. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 76-82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Shin, D., Kee, K.F. and Shin, E.Y. (2022) Algorithm Awareness: Why User Awareness Is Critical for Personal Privacy in the Adoption of Algorithmic Platforms? International Journal of Information Management, 65, Article ID: 102494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 占南, 闫香玉. 电商智能推荐用户信息隐私披露意愿影响机制研究[J]. 现代情报, 2023, 43(10): 35-53.
[6] 强月新, 肖迪. “隐私悖论”源于过度自信? 隐私素养的主客观差距对自我表露的影响研究[J]. 新闻界, 2021(6): 39-51+64.
[7] Mutimukwe, C., Kolkowska, E. and Grönlund, Å. (2020) Information Privacy in e-Service: Effect of Organizational Privacy Assurances on Individual Privacy Concerns, Perceptions, Trust and Self-Disclosure Behavior. Government Information Quarterly, 37, Article ID: 101413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Barth, S. and de Jong, M.D.T. (2017) The Privacy Paradox—Investigating Discrepancies between Expressed Privacy Concerns and Actual Online Behavior—A Systematic Literature Review. Telematics and Informatics, 34, 1038-1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 刘永芳. “原因”和“理由”在归因活动中的不同使用[J]. 心理科学, 1995(2): 116-118.
[10] Mehrabian, A. and Russell, J.A. (1974) An Approach to Environmental Psychology. The MIT Press.
[11] Petronio, S. (2002) Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure. State University of New York Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, J. and Hart, P. (2011) Information Privacy Concerns: Linking Individual Perceptions with Institutional Privacy Assurances. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12, 798-824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 顾理平, 杨苗. 个人隐私数据“二次使用”中的边界[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2016, 23(9): 75-86.
[14] Malhotra, N.K., Kim, S.S. and Agarwal, J. (2004) Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model. Information Systems Research, 15, 336-355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Chellappa, R.K. and Sin, R.G. (2005) Personalization versus Privacy: An Empirical Examination of the Online Consumer’s Dilemma. Information Technology and Management, 6, 181-202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Nissenbaum, H. (1998) Protecting Privacy in an Information Age: The Problem of Privacy in Public. Law and Philosophy, 17, 559-596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Okazaki, S., Li, H. and Hirose, M. (2009) Consumer Privacy Concerns and Preference for Degree of Regulatory Control. Journal of Advertising, 38, 63-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Sharma, S. and Crossler, R.E. (2014) Disclosing Too Much? Situational Factors Affecting Information Disclosure in Social Commerce Environment. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 13, 305-319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Aguirre, E., Mahr, D., Grewal, D., de Ruyter, K. and Wetzels, M. (2015) Unraveling the Personalization Paradox: The Effect of Information Collection and Trust-Building Strategies on Online Advertisement Effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 91, 34-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 袁梦倩. “被遗忘权”之争: 大数据时代的数字化记忆与隐私边界[J]. 学海, 2015(4): 55-61.
[21] 刘百灵, 孙文静. 沟通隐私管理理论整体视角下移动用户信息披露决策的过程研究[J]. 管理科学, 2021, 34(6): 76-87.
[22] Clarke, R. (2001) Person Location and Person Tracking—Technologies, Risks and Policy Implications. Information Technology & People, 14, 206-231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Beinat, E. (2001) Privacy and Location-Based Services: Stating the Policies Clearly. GeoInformatics, 4, 14-17.
[24] Martin, K.D., Borah, A. and Palmatier, R.W. (2017) Data Privacy: Effects on Customer and Firm Performance. Journal of Marketing, 81, 36-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Tucker, C.E. (2014) Social Networks, Personalized Advertising, and Privacy Controls. Journal of Marketing Research, 51, 546-562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A. and Loewenstein, G. (2012) Misplaced Confidences: Privacy and the Control Paradox. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 340-347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Ajzen, I. (2011) The Theory of Planned Behaviour: Reactions and Reflections. Psychology & Health, 26, 1113-1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] 张晓丹, 龚艳萍, 张琴. 网络嵌入对消费者团购意愿影响的实证研究[J]. 系统管理学报, 2017, 26(4): 624-637.
[29] 王洪伟, 周曼, 何绍义. 影响个人在线提供隐私信息意愿的实证研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2012, 32(10): 2186-2197.
[30] Libaque-Sáenz, C.F., Wong, S.F., Chang, Y. and Bravo, E.R. (2021) The Effect of Fair Information Practices and Data Collection Methods on Privacy-Related Behaviors: A Study of Mobile Apps. Information & Management, 58, Article ID: 103284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Xu, H., Luo, X.R., Carroll, J.M. and Rosson, M.B. (2011) The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Exploratory Study of Decision Making Process for Location-Aware Marketing. Decision Support Systems, 51, 42-52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Awad, N.F. and Krishnan, M.S. (2006) The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to Be Profiled Online for Personalization. MIS Quarterly, 30, 13-28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Luzak, J.A. (2014) Privacy Notice for Dummies? Towards European Guidelines on How to Give “Clear and Comprehensive Information” on the Cookies’ Use in Order to Protect the Internet Users’ Right to Online Privacy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 547-559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Mills, C. (2010) Experiencing Gossip: The Foundations for a Theory of Embedded Organizational Gossip. Group & Organization Management, 35, 213-240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Smith, N.C. and Cooper-Martin, E. (1997) Ethics and Target Marketing: The Role of Product Harm and Consumer Vulnerability. Journal of Marketing, 61, 1-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[36] White, T.B., Zahay, D.L., Thorbjørnsen, H. and Shavitt, S. (2008) Getting Too Personal: Reactance to Highly Personalized Email Solicitations. Marketing Letters, 19, 39-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] Bleier, A. and Eisenbeiss, M. (2015) The Importance of Trust for Personalized Online Advertising. Journal of Retailing, 91, 390-409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[38] 聂勇浩, 罗景月. 感知有用性、信任与社交网站用户的个人信息披露意愿[J]. 图书情报知识, 2013(5): 89-97.